This one is beyond puzzling. The Bureau of Prisons has assembled a list of "acceptable" religions books. That means that in prisons across America libraries are being stripped of religious texts not on the approved list. You couldn't have sold...
Well, let me take a crack at possible reasonable thinking.
Prisons are (typically) government institutions covered by the establishment clause of the constitution and at the same time, the custodian of the people inside. Someone might argue, therefore that there is a need to provide appropriate faith resources such as hymnals, scripture, liturgical texts. A theological text might or might not be appropriate depending on how anti-social or positive it is. The government should not provide evangelical screeds and needn't provide every theological resource, so maybe someone thought they would provide only interpretive or exegetic works that don't include anti-social or divisive conclusions. This might be done less efficiently negatively (look for offensive or anti-social messages in all religious books) than positively (have a commission select a broad cross-section of theology with a positive message.
That said, I'm baffled, too. But it has been my experience that even in government what sounds ridiculous is usually at least plausible if you know the reasons behind the decision.
John E.
September 10, 2007 7:10 PM
They are trying to do something about Radical Islam and skinhead Christian Identity gangs. Rod has a similar blog post going.
Donny
September 10, 2007 9:41 PM
Just setting all of us up for the mark of the beast.
It'll start in the prison system first.
Thinker
September 10, 2007 10:34 PM
Now, let me see - theology is too dangerous for our brutal and gang ridden prison system? C.S. Lewis is a favorite, but removing Dulles and Niebuhr? With this kind of mentality - they will remove books by Ratzinger and leave books by Pope Benedict. This is one the ACLU might want to become involved in.
I'm rather horrified. I understand the need to eliminate books that advocate violence in a prison, but not those that advocate thinking.
There isn't a reasonable place for this kind of figurative book burning.
If I could give books to prisoners - I would start with Joseph Cardinal Bernardin's "the Seamless Garment". I might send a bunch of copies of Gil Bailie's "Violence Unveiled". Pretty sure both would be banned by the prison boards.
aquaman
September 11, 2007 11:54 AM
"Remember those who are in prison, as though you were in prison with them; those who are being tortured, as though you yourselves were being tortured" (Heb 13:3).
David, you struggle to understand how this could happen. It happened because too many of us forget that prisoners are part of the Body of Christ too.
Peace.
canucklehead
September 11, 2007 3:32 PM
>>>"Just setting all of us up for the mark of the beast.
It'll start in the prison system first."
Good to see you're up to speed with your "Left Behind" books, Donny.
Speaking of which, did they make the prison list cut?
It not, does that mean we are now truly in the last daze?
And, by the way, is it true that Wheaton, Illinois, is changing it's telephone area code to 666?
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Well, let me take a crack at possible reasonable thinking.
Prisons are (typically) government institutions covered by the establishment clause of the constitution and at the same time, the custodian of the people inside. Someone might argue, therefore that there is a need to provide appropriate faith resources such as hymnals, scripture, liturgical texts. A theological text might or might not be appropriate depending on how anti-social or positive it is. The government should not provide evangelical screeds and needn't provide every theological resource, so maybe someone thought they would provide only interpretive or exegetic works that don't include anti-social or divisive conclusions. This might be done less efficiently negatively (look for offensive or anti-social messages in all religious books) than positively (have a commission select a broad cross-section of theology with a positive message.
That said, I'm baffled, too. But it has been my experience that even in government what sounds ridiculous is usually at least plausible if you know the reasons behind the decision.
They are trying to do something about Radical Islam and skinhead Christian Identity gangs. Rod has a similar blog post going.
Just setting all of us up for the mark of the beast.
It'll start in the prison system first.
Now, let me see - theology is too dangerous for our brutal and gang ridden prison system? C.S. Lewis is a favorite, but removing Dulles and Niebuhr? With this kind of mentality - they will remove books by Ratzinger and leave books by Pope Benedict. This is one the ACLU might want to become involved in.
I'm rather horrified. I understand the need to eliminate books that advocate violence in a prison, but not those that advocate thinking.
There isn't a reasonable place for this kind of figurative book burning.
If I could give books to prisoners - I would start with Joseph Cardinal Bernardin's "the Seamless Garment". I might send a bunch of copies of Gil Bailie's "Violence Unveiled". Pretty sure both would be banned by the prison boards.
"Remember those who are in prison, as though you were in prison with them; those who are being tortured, as though you yourselves were being tortured" (Heb 13:3).
David, you struggle to understand how this could happen. It happened because too many of us forget that prisoners are part of the Body of Christ too.
Peace.
>>>"Just setting all of us up for the mark of the beast.
It'll start in the prison system first."
Good to see you're up to speed with your "Left Behind" books, Donny.
Speaking of which, did they make the prison list cut?
It not, does that mean we are now truly in the last daze?
And, by the way, is it true that Wheaton, Illinois, is changing it's telephone area code to 666?
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.