There is something about those awful California fires and our government's response and President Bush's response that is bugging me. I've isolated the problem. It is two words long. New Orleans.
Our government's response to the fires has been basically in line with what citizens should expect. It was swift, it was thorough and it promises to continue as the painful and trying rebuilding moves forward. It is in line with how the government responded in 9/11's aftermath in New York.
I'm glad he went out there. I'm glad he consoled some people. The pictures are very nice. 
That is what continues to trouble me about New Orleans and Katrina. Not only was our government's failure historically horrific, it continues to this day.
Read what noted history professor Douglas Brinkley wrote on Katrina's 2nd anniversary:
Over the past two years since Hurricane Katrina, I've seen waves of hardworking volunteers from nonprofits, faith-based groups and college campuses descend on New Orleans, full of compassion and hope.They arrive in the city's Ninth Ward to painstakingly gut houses one by one. Their jaws drop as they wander around afflicted zones, gazing at the towering mounds of debris and uprooted infrastructure.
After weeks of grueling labor, they realize that they are running in place, toiling in a surreal vacuum.
Two full years after the hurricane, the Big Easy is barely limping along, unable to make truly meaningful reconstruction progress. The most important issues concerning the city's long-term survival are still up in the air. Why is no Herculean clean-up effort underway? Why hasn't President Bush named a high-profile czar such as Colin Powell or James Baker to oversee the ongoing disaster? Where is the U.S. government's participation in the rebuilding?
And why are volunteers practically the only ones working to reconstruct homes in communities that may never again have sewage service, garbage collection or electricity?
Eventually, the volunteers' altruism turns to bewilderment and finally to outrage. They've been hoodwinked. The stalled recovery can't be blamed on bureaucratic inertia or red tape alone. Many volunteers come to understand what I've concluded is the heartless reality: The Bush administration actually wants these neighborhoods below sea level to die on the vine.
I don't want to believe that it is all about money and race but the Bush administration is making it harder and harder to come to any other conclusion. This administration's days are numbered. There is little it can do. History will judge this administration one of the worst ever. It is simply a matter of its position. There are, however, things that can be done. Showing up in San Diego was terrific Mr. President but how about going back to that city in Louisiana.... you know, this one you were looking at while it flooded:
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
I was dismayed and then disgusted by the president's comments in his news conference from California. His back-handed slap at Louisiana leadership, was a pitiful attempt to excuse and cover-up his own administration's sorry handling of the Katrina disaster. As Larry commented above -- maybe (this time) it's not race, but rather politics (Republican southern Calif. counties.) Though probably not typical, a telling moment occurred in the wildfire coverage when one man lamented that, with his home gone, he'd have to live in his vacation house for a while. That anyone's home is destroyed by fire (or water) is a traumatic event, and I feel grat sadness and empathy for them (rich or poor) but the contrast between Katrina and the wildfires is too great to go unnoticed.
>>I don't want to believe that it is all about money and race but the Bush administration is making it harder and harder to come to any other conclusion.
It isn't strictly about money and race - if poor and middle-class blacks voted Republican, Bush would have been all over NO after the flooding.
Maxkitty,
I am neither poor nor black and the President left me to die in New Orleans after the levees failed because they were built wrong by the US Army Corps of Engineers.
I am a tax-paying American refugee from that crime. He denied the Governor troops unless she allowed him to nationalize the entire state. Give me a break. Please do not defend that draft dodger or his draft dodging administration.
David,
Thank you for such a good post and I appreciate hearing you keep this tragedy in the news.
May I recommend the book "Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein, which illustrates where this country has gone.
http://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine
And this group is the best word I have found on the levee failures.
http://levees.org/
Lest we forget Hurricane Andrew in 1992, the government (1st Bush) wasn't there for that one either.
Nor for Huricanes Charlie, Wilma, Jeane and Francis. Florida has been beaten down these last four years from 8 huricanes. Is it our fault we live in huricane alley? I lived here for 35 years and never have seen weather like this.
Finally after Governor Jeb Bush left office we got Charlie Christ who went to Washington this year lobbying for a national policy on catastrophic insurance. He was laughed at by the Washington Bureacrats. One laughs until the crisis hits your city, then you cry. I learned along time ago as a South Floridian that the government is not coming. And it's just plain sad and makes me angry.
To the comment about how it is not the governments job to help.
That would make sense - IF the republican congress and this president hadn't voted to send millions of tax-payer dollars to the oil companies to develop new oil resources - the SAME year those companies posted record profits. Not just for their industry, but for ANY industry! How about when the government bailed out various airlines? Did you protest then? How about the millions to billions of dollars they award on no-bid contracts to business owners who give big contributions to various Republican campaigns (Blackwater ring a bell?). Then there is passing a law making people unable to use bankruptcy laws to get out from under crushing debt with rates that just 30 years ago would have been ruled as USUARY in many states. And do it in the name of making the middle class fiscal responsible. All the while, running up a deficit that my great-grandchildren will be paying off.
So yes, let's help out those businesses, CEO's and owners who through their own greed and mis-judgements run their business into the ground and ruin the lives of the people who depended on them for a living. That's make the rich even richer by giving them the money that those horrible unresponsbile, lazy poor and middle class people payed in taxes. That's make it so that indentured servitued to credit card companies is all but in the open. But those who do the messy work - the ones who make barely enough to keep food on the table and the lights on (and that by working 2-3 jobs) - that's just kick them when they're down and claim that the government owes them nothing.
Sorry - but I just can't buy the whole 'we're the responsible ones' 'We're the values voters' or 'I believe in compassionate conservatism', when I see stuff like this coming from so many people who NEVER hold their government responsible for such obvious hypocrisy.
URGH!
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.