J-Walking

Poli-pastors

Monday October 8, 2007

Categories: Faith, Politics

Beware the poli-pastors.

Politicians have always been chided for promising anything during a campaign, even the moon in the form of manned lunar bases, and metaphorically in the form of economic bliss, health care nirvana, and two-sentence solutions to Iraq.

Increasingly, however, promising the moon just isn’t enough. Politicians – regardless of party, policy, or standing in straw polls - are making promises of harmony, unity, even salvation. Consider Sen. Obama's words last year, “…we should talk more about our empathy deficit - the ability to put ourselves in someone else's shoes; because our individual salvation depends on our collective salvation.” Or consider his words yesterday, "We're going to keep on praising together. I am confident that we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth."

Really? That is dicey theology no matter ones creed and begs the question of the of said salvation’s destination – heaven or streets full of hugs?

Such a sentiment is easy to ridicule, but actually flows from an ageless stream of American political rhetoric. While we are accustomed to hearing promises like Herbert Hoover’s, “a chicken in every pot and a car in every garage,” we forget how the honorable George Washington promised America would advance because of the “the gracious indulgence of Heaven” and could therefore “look forward to the riches, power, and happiness… it seems destined” to reach.

Virtually every American politician has assumed a divine right to utter spiritual truths and make spiritual promises. Lincoln declared without a hint of cynicism that government’s “leading object is to elevate the condition of men – to lift artificial weights from all shoulders, to clear the paths of laudable pursuit,” not only materially, but spiritually.

Those spiritual promises, however, tended to adorn political speeches, not provide their substance. Ray Suarez, in his book The Holy Vote, confirms that while “God appears in the words of Lincoln, Wilson, both Roosevelts, Eisenhower, Carter and others, the Almighty has now moved from the wings to the center of the speech.”

Why? In part because of “George W. Jesus” and his enormously successful political self-portrayal as “pastor-in-chief” to millions of evangelical Christians. If politicians always run the last campaign, then Bush’s spiritual exhibitionism is leading some candidates - mostly Democratic ones - to speak as much about their spiritual goals for themselves and for America as about their policy goals.

If this salvation talk from politicians is confusing, try listening to some of America’s leading pastors.

Like American politicians, America’s clergy have always had a political voice. After all, it was John Winthrop sloshing across the Atlantic on the Arbella in 1630 who first proclaimed America “a city set on a hill” and thus a “new Jerusalem”.

Now, however, pastors and religious leaders are becoming defined by the their political promises. Consider the Christian mega-ministry Focus on the Family. In a letter to supporters kicking off 2006, Focus leader James Dobson sited only one leader for inspiration. Jesus? Paul? Moses? No, no, and no. It was “Ronald Reagan [who] once said, ‘Every new day begins with possibilities. It's up to us to fill it with things that move us toward progress and peace.’” In Ohio, nearly 1,000 churches are now part of a political mobilization network to support conservative candidates. Rev. Al Sharpton attacked fellow African-American pastors not over bad theology but because they had “chosen to ignore or have simply forgotten the big-picture vision promoted by Dr. King and his kin” by opposing gay marriage. What gives?

The poli-pastors are taking over. Politicians think that by sounding like preachers they are going to win votes and preachers think that by sounding like politicians they will grow churches, bring in money, and “save” America. Unfortunately, the net result is bad politics and even worse faith.

Ascribing too much spiritual weight to politicians burdens them with a spiritual authority they do not have – no matter what they do, they won’t deliver a new heaven or create a new earth. They are limited to governing well and serving citizens in their pursuit of peaceable and productive lives. Meanwhile, becoming too encumbered with politics distracts spiritual leaders from their primary eternal purpose and entangles God in political fights that cheapen his reputation.

Let’s hope it doesn’t require crystal meth and gay prostitutes to set everyone straight - though that is helping New Life Church find its way back.

Its founding pastor Ted Haggard, who also headed the National Association of Evangelicals, was exposed last year for dabbling in those things. I talked to a friend who attends the church. He was crushed by Pastor Haggard’s sins, but stayed in the church. How was it going?

Wonderful, he exclaimed. Given all of Pastor Ted’s political involvement, his sermons had become ever more political – more America than Jesus. Now that had changed. Jesus was back, the church was thriving and relationships were being renewed.

They are rediscovering that ‘hope in the unseen’ is the stuff of faith and ‘hope in the seen’ is the stuff of government.


Advertisement
Comments
Charity
October 8, 2007 5:22 PM

Thanks. :-) This is an issue I've thought a lot about - partly because of my study of the reformation. Government - the recognized law making and enforcement body - has a lot of power over people. Religion - the recognized moral force - also has a lot of power over people, albeit in a different way. When they are separated, they tend to play and balance each other. But when one has too much dominance or power, individual freedom suffers. And that's part of what makes the various cultures in the west value the individual. If you put government and religion together, they both work sustain themselves at the expense of the individual. Basically, it doesn't matter if one person or even a whole groups suffers, as long as everything keeps chugging along.

Don't know if that makes sense or not....

pudge
October 8, 2007 5:53 PM

Wow. I can't believe Obama said that.

I need to find my old "immanentize the eschaton" button!

Larry Parker
October 8, 2007 6:10 PM

Not a wise choice of words by Obama, but ...

Doesn't the sentiment, at least, come out of (I assume) not only Obama's own faith in the UCC, but also the political -- from the Democrats -- AND RELIGIOUS, from folks like you, calculation that we are better off as a country to have people of faith in both parties, rather than monopolized by the Republicans?

Donny
October 8, 2007 9:17 PM

Well now David, starting to get around to good old fashion Bible Truth? Your old pal George Bush knows how to take a stand.

"Increasingly, however, promising the moon just isn’t enough. Politicians – regardless of party, policy, or standing in straw polls -are making promises of harmony, unity, even salvation."

Salvation is only from Jesus and it came at the expense of great dis-unity and dis-harmony, as Matthew reports:

"Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to SET A MAN AGAINST HIS FATHER, AND A DAUGHTER AGAINST HER MOTHER, AND A DAUGHTER-IN-LAW AGAINST HER MOTHER-IN-LAW; and A MAN'S ENEMIES WILL BE THE MEMBERS OF HIS HOUSEHOLD. He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; and he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. He who has found his life will lose it, and he who has lost his life for My sake will find it."

And Luke brings us a similar statement:

"Do you suppose that I came to grant peace on earth? I tell you, no, but rather division; for from now on five members in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three. "They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law."

\\\

Now who is it that derides President Bush for "NOT" uniting us all? Christians are not supposed to be like pimps or used car salesmen. They are supposed to stand for what is right.

Now click on over to places like "God's Politics," and see the attempt at uniting opposites.

Thinker
October 8, 2007 10:59 PM

Wow, Charity - Doug's right. Stunningly succinct.
And Donny, - Goerge Bush knows how to take a stand - and that is the problem. He doesn't know when it is time to come to the table and make peace. Take a look at the cross - it is the collision of opposites - with Jesus holding it together in pain and suffering. Someday - somewhere - it will make sense to you.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

About J-Walking

This blog is no longer updated and is closed for comments. We welcome your comments about Christianity in our Christianity forums.

Read David Kuo's bio

Search This Blog

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.