Evangelicals are being seduced back into the GOP not by a politician, but by a pastor. Spiritually speaking, they should resist.
At the moment President Bush ascended to reelection in 2004, Christian conservatives had attained political power almost unequaled in modern American history - perhaps only the post-WW2 labor movement was its equal. From 1980 through Bush’s second term, religious conservatives had ushered in 20 years of republican presidents, a decade of Republican control of Congress, seven of the nine Supreme Court justices, and the sense that they controlled the GOP.
Then something strange happen. They went on a retreat of sorts. As their pastor-in-chief, George W. Bush, descended into scandal, presided over the Iraq debacle, and failed to live up to his pledge to “restore honor and dignity to the White House,” evangelicals went away. They stopped giving to Republican candidates - the latest report shows that only 30% of those who gave in 2004 gave to Romney, McCain, Giuliani, Huckabee or any of the other GOP candidates.
Preachers galore started telling their congregations to just say no to partisan politics. One need look no further than New Life Church in Colorado Springs where the pastor who succeeded the uber-political (and uber-fallen) Ted Haggard has declared his pulpit “politics free.” But one could also look to Minnesota where evangelical mega-church pastor Greg Boyd is preaching that the radical life of a Christian doesn’t include politics. Or even to California, where evangelicalism’s biggest star, Rick Warren, is decidedly absent from domestic politics preferring to spend his time working on HIV/AIDS in Africa.
I like to think that there is another reason that evangelicals have gone missing from politics. They sense how damaging it has been to the perception of their Christian faith.
Christian pollster David Kinnaman writes, “The number of young people in our culture who now embrace unflattering perspectives about Christians and politics is astounding. Three-quarters of young [non-Christians] and half of young churchgoers describe present-day Christianity as “too involved in politics.”
Adults aren’t too much different. More than half of the adult population in America describes the political involvement of Christians as a concern. Twenty percent of all evangelicals believe that adopting a conservative Christian political agenda has helped destroy the image of Jesus Christ.
For a community of believers, like evangelicals, for whom sharing the life-giving message of Jesus is an essential part of life, this sort of data is a shock to the system. It is evidence that perhaps they have been misplacing their priorities - focusing far more on the city of man than on the City of God.
Now, however, they are being tempted back into politics by the only person who could have reinvigorated them - a pastor named Mike Huckabee.
His Iowa “Believe” television ad testifies that he is a “Christian leader.” During campaign events he has taken to handing out “commitment cards” of the sort given to people in churches who have made a decision to follow Jesus. Except the commitment Huckabee is looking for is one of a different sort - a buck and a vote.
His repeat appearances in pulpits across Iowa (for votes) and Texas (for money) might have been the kind of thing he, as a Baptist pastor, would have railed against at one time in his life because they so blur the line between faith and politics...and potentially the law.
At one such event last month, televangelist James Robison introduced Huckabee, who was there to give a sermon on marriage entitled, “State of the Union: What God has joined together,” by exhorting the church to go to his website, and not so subtly asking them to consider giving him money, “It may just be that you will impressed not only to pray for him but to help him. ...It is one thing to pray and another thing to become an answer to prayer, I have found great peace in prayer but I have found greater joy in becoming answers to prayers. You can be that.”
It is hard to watch that kind of introduction and not think of Jesus’ stern warning not to give Caesar more than his due. It is even harder not to think of Jesus storming the temple to rid it of the corruption that was found there.
This is precisely the kind of melding of conservative politics and Jesus’ Gospel that has moved many evangelicals to believe that too much focus on politics has hurt Christianity.
George W. Bush perfected the art of running for president while campaigning as pastor-in-chief. His was, however, a behind-the-scenes campaign. Although he very publicly professed that Jesus was his favorite philosopher, his public professions of faith were infrequent. It was the unseen stuff that mattered. His team brought in pastors aplenty to hear Bush’s personal conversion testimony - Jesus brought the man with a drinking problem to his knees and then to great heights. These pastors then went out and told their flocks about Bush’s faith. It was viral spiritual marketing. It worked. Evangelicals didn’t just love Bush the politician, they came to see him as a spiritual brother and a spiritual leader.
A recent poll found that more people thought of George W. Bush as a Christian leader than any American except Billy Graham. That isn’t a good thing because the words associated with Bush were “dishonest,” “hypocritical” and a “bad example of Christianity.”
Now evangelicals are being tempted back into the political by a pastor. They should resist. Evangelicals who have been burned by a president posing as pastor-in-chief shouldn’t think having a real pastor as president will make a difference.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Jim,
"I am equally uncomfortable with the idea that a preacher is automatically unqualified to be president."
Being a preacher is not the reason people believe Huck is "automatically unqualified to be president". (There are multitudes of other reasons.) But being a precher is NOT a qualification FOR president in the first place, last time I checked.
"Huckabee doesn't strike me as a puppet of the religious right as Bush is."
Nah, he just wants to quarantine people with AIDS. Nothing from the religious right agenda in that, is there? ;{O)
"Huckabee comes across to me as someone with strong religious convictions"
But as I (and others) continually ask: SO FRIKKIN' WHAT?
"I think he is a decent, fair minded Christian man."
How come no one ever sees the danger in the total lack of the opportunity to make a statement like, "I think X is a decent, fair minded Hindu man."? Or Sikh man? Or Jewish man? Or Jain man? Or Wiccan man? Or Muslim man? Or agnostic man? Or atheist man?
Remember, there is not supposed to BE ANY religious test to hold public office in America. So WHAT if he is (in your opinion) both "decent' and "fair minded". His "Christianity" is not supposed to be a factor. It certainly isn't a "qualification" to be president.
Donny
The real reason people have bad impresions of Christians is the actual behaviour of actual Christians. It has nothing to do with portrayals "by Hollywood". Where is the love? Certainly not in your hate-filled rhetoric.
Ex-P, this question: (Now it seems required, but only for SOME religions.) "Do you believe every word in the Bible?" WAS ONLY ASKED of Republican candidates . . . even though the Dems stump in every Church they can. Not one anti-Christian word from the media to them. C Kitty, you cannot prove one example of hate-filled rhetoric in my responses. Your typical leftie ad hom is all you got. This is not a game being played against Christians. I have a duty and responsibility to love my fellow Christian, and that includes warning them about evil. Oh, Ex-P, prove where Falwell and Dobson have done anything wrong as Christians?
It is interesting to note that C.S. Lewis-respected writer and Christian thinker-makes brief comment in his book, "Mere Christianity" about mixing Christianity with politics, implying it to be wrong to expect success in force feeding a Christian agenda and values through the government and political arena. However, I believe in a personal conscious approach that, as a Christian, attracts me to the candidate that is most likely to adhere to the moral code that generally speaking all men and women recognize as believers or non-believers, also spoken of by Lewis in the early chapters of his book. I don't think it unreasonable to believe Christians should follow that recognized moral code that God has supplied all men in casting their vote whether it be for a pastor or non-pastor. Biblically speaking, believers held a wide variety of positions that God used them according to His will, positions ranging from politicians to slaves and wealthy to poor. In that, I believe the individual's personal motivation is the key. Is Mike Huckabee motivated to be President because he truly believes that to be God's will in his life, to use that position if attained to bring glory to God in a way that can extend the reach of the gospel, or does he merely have a human agenda? Personally, I believe him to be genuine in his bid for office as someone not trying to force feed his faith but instead following what he believes God has given him in direction. Finally, I support him as a Christian and as someone who is trying to follow the moral code that is universal. I believe his stances are reflective of what moral people, Christian and non-Christians, are looking for and won't discredit him for simply being forthright in making it known that his foundation is in Christ.
"Oh, Ex-P, prove where Falwell and Dobson have done anything wrong as Christians?" Donny
For starters, David had a fairly enlightening vignette in his book on Falwell's behavior at the post 9-11 memorial service in the National Cathedral. But other than that, you're probably right, Donny, they're flawless, and will be admitted to heaven accordingly.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.