Dr. James Dobson has released a statement whacking John McCain. Here it is in full and here are the substantial points:
I am deeply disappointed the Republican Party seems poised to select a nominee who did not support a Constitutional amendment to protect the institution of marriage, voted for embryonic stem-cell research to kill nascent human beings, opposed tax cuts that ended the marriage penalty, has little regard for freedom of speech, organized the Gang of 14 to preserve filibusters in judicial hearings, and has a legendary temper and often uses foul and obscene language.
And there, in a nutshell, is the Christian worldview as James Dobson pronounces it:
- cutting taxes
- a Constitutional amendment "protecting" marriage
- elimination of embryonic stem-cell research
- a US Senate stripped of the very powers that the Founders gave it
- not cursing.
Damn. Is there a more succinct and stunning summation of the reason why evangelical voters are throwing off self-appointed evangelical mullahs like James Dobson? And why, according to a new Barna study, 40% of evangelicals would vote for the Democratic candidate if the election were held today (versus 28% for the Republican candidate).
Evangelical voters are saying that they think a Christian worldview should include tackling issues like poverty and health care. They are saying that perhaps Jesus would oppose the wanton torture of other human beings. They are saying that perhaps obeying God's first command - to care for His creation - matters. And they are saying that the idea of deporting 12 million illegal immigrants sounds cruel and frightening.
By putting himself out there so forcefully, Dr. Dobson risks playing the role of Dr. Kevorkian in ushering in the end of the old-line religious right.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Phil, do you accept government authorized tax receipts for your private donations? If you don't, millions of Americans do, so don't try and make it sound like Americans are just tripping all over yourselves to give your money away out of the simple goodness of your hearts.
"The figures I cited are widely available from numerous sources to anyone who has 30 seconds to do an internet search."
Utter nonsense, making one internet search for such info from scratch would require AT LEAST 30 seconds. But if I recall, you criticized me for only citing one source.
Kitty's point is well taken - apparently you don't have the 30 seconds to cite those numerous sources from the net.
P.S. Check out World Vision's website as one Christian charity that doesn't entirely buy the spin that the UN "sycophants's" stats are completely askew.
Phil, do you accept government authorized tax receipts for your private donations? If you don't, millions of Americans do, so don't try and make it sound like Americans are just tripping all over yourselves to give your money away out of the simple goodness of your hearts.
First of all, I know plenty of people (like myself) who've never bothered to deduct our charitable giving on our tax forms (not that I'm against it). That being said, it sounds like you don't have a firm grasp on how tax deductions work. If you think Americans are donating to charity because it's financially rewarding, well, you're just plain wrong.
However, America's generosity is aided by the fact that our total tax burden and regulatory burden is lower than most developed countries (the majority of which are steeped in socialism). Further proof that socialism does not create a more just or charitable society but rather stifles the individual's capacity for generosity.
Kitty's point is well taken - apparently you don't have the 30 seconds to cite those numerous sources from the net.
I'm mystified that we're even having this debate because this truly is a no-brainer for anybody who cares to be informed.
Nonetheless, if you insist that you're incapable of doing the simple research it takes to confirm my assertion that America is the most generous nation on the face of the earth (by any measure); allow me to present you with some web links that will jump start the process for you:
We'll start with an exhaustive comparison compiled by "Charities Aid Foundation," an organization based in the UK (www.cafonline.org). They've gathered data from all the available surveys and have published a pdf that breaks down charitable giving among the developed nations. Here's a link to the pdf:
http://tinyurl.com/26rbnh
Be sure to check out page 6 for a comparison of charitable giving levels as a percentage of GDP. You'll see that America more than doubles any other nation on the list. The entire document is an excellent read with some very interesting insights.
Here's a link to an article that first appeared in the WSJ Europe:
http://tinyurl.com/2jje6f
I highly recommend the whole article but here are some highlights:
"Statistics have long shown that the amount of charitable giving in Europe lags far behind that in the United States. But the reason probably has more to do with discouraging tax rules than innate differences in generosity of spirit."
"While giving totals have moved sharply upwards in America, to a point where philanthropic donations now account for 2% of GDP, the British trend has gone in the opposite direction. The proportion of households donating to charity has actually decreased by 10% since 1978."
"As for the corporate world, approximately one percent of all US company profits before taxation go to charity. The corresponding figure in Britain is 0.2%."
Again we see that high tax and regulatory burdens, that are a staple of socialist economies, lead to less charitable societies rather than more charitable societies.
Here's a couple of links from the AFP to round out our primer:
http://tinyurl.com/359gjn
http://tinyurl.com/33edzo
That should be enough to get you started. BTW, you're right, it did take me longer than 30 seconds to assemble these references; it took me about 15 minutes.
Kitty's point is well taken - apparently you don't have the 30 seconds to cite those numerous sources from the net.
I have replied to your post but due to the fact that it has web links in it, David has to approve it before it will show up.
Thx
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.