J-Walking

Thoughts on suffering, pt. 2

Tuesday May 13, 2008

Categories: Faith


Tonight my father called a cousin in Chengdu who, we discovered with relief, is fine. His reports about the incredible destruction at the earthquake's epicenter were anything but comforting. So mangled are the roads that getting there with any help is next to impossible.

I've been in Chengdu, I've been in the mountainous outskirts where the quake was centered. And as the son of a geophysicist who, among other thing, specializes in earthquakes and has done work in Chengdu, this strikes close to home.

I don't have much to add to all the words being penned right now about China or Myanmar but I have one thing to add. This blog from a Harvard law professor dealing with his own awful cancer. They all relate me thinks:

I don’t have any previous experience with this sort of thing, but judging from what I hear and read, I’m supposed to be asking why all this is happening, and why it’s happening to me. Honestly, those questions are about the farthest thing from my mind.

Partly, that’s because they aren’t hard questions. Why does our world have gravity? Why does the sun rise in the East? There are technical answers, but the metaphysical answer is simple: that’s how reality works. So too here. Only in the richest parts of the rich world of the twenty-first century could anyone entertain the thought that we should expect long, pain-free lives. Suffering and premature death (an odd phrase: what does it mean to call death “premature”?) are constant presences in the lives of most of the peoples of the Earth, and were routine parts of life for generations of our predecessors in this country—as they still are today, for those with their eyes open. Stage 4 cancers happen to middle-aged men and women, seemingly out of the blue, because that’s how reality works.

As for why this is happening to me in particular, the implicit point of the question is an argument: I deserve better than this. There are two responses. First, I don’t—I have no greater moral claim to be free from unwanted pain and loss than anyone else. Plenty of people more virtuous than I am suffer worse than I have, and some who don’t seem virtuous at all skate through life with surprising ease. Welcome to the world. Once again, it seems to me that this claim arises from the incredibly unusual experience of a small class of wealthy professionals in the wealthiest parts of the world today. We think we live in a world governed by merit and moral desert. It isn’t so. Luck, fortune, fate, providence—call it what you will, but whatever your preferred label, it has far more to do with the successes of the successful than what any of us deserves. Aristocracies of the past awarded wealth and position based on the accident of birth. Today’s meritocracies award wealth and position based on the accident of being in the right place at the right time. The difference is smaller than we tend to think. Once you understand that, it’s hard to maintain a sense of grievance in the face of even the ugliest medical news. I’ve won more than my share of life’s lotteries. It would seem churlish to rail at the unfairness of losing this one—if indeed I do lose it: which I may not.

The second response is simpler; it comes from the movie “Unforgiven.” Gene Hackman is dying, and says to Clint Eastwood: “I don’t deserve this. To die like this. I was building a house.” Eastwood responds: “Deserve’s got nothing to do with it.”

That gets it right, I think. It’s a messed-up world, upside-down as often as it’s rightside up. Bad things happen; future plans (that house Hackman was building) come to naught. Deserve’s got nothing to do with it.

Why, then, are we so prone to think otherwise? This is one of the biggest reasons I believe my faith is true: something deep within us expects, even demands moral order—in a world that shouts from the rooftops that no such order exists. Any good metaphysical theory must explain both of those phenomena: both the expectation and the lack of supporting evidence for the thing expected. The only persuasive way to get there, I think, is to begin with a world made good that was twisted, corrupted, bent. Buried deep in our hearts are hints of the way things ought to be; the ugliest reality can’t snuff them out. Still, that reality exists; it can’t be denied. Christianity sees that reality, recognizes it for what it is—but also sees the expectation, and recognizes where it comes from.

Bottom line: I don’t need anyone to tell me why I’m in the situation I’m in, and I certainly don’t think I merit an exemption from the rottenness to which the rest of the world is subject.

But I do need to know some things. Three, to be precise: first, that I’m not alone; second, that my disease has not made me ugly to those I love and to the God who made me; and third, that somehow, something good can come from this. My faith tells me that the God of the universe suffered everything I suffer and infinitely worse. Death and suffering don’t separate human beings from our Creator—on the contrary: those things unite us with our Creator. The barrier became the bridge: that is the great miracle of the Incarnation, the Cross, and the Resurrection. So I need never suffer alone. Job’s story confirms that, far from rejecting the ugliness of disease and pain, God embraces those who suffer and takes on their suffering. Beauty and ugliness are turned inside-out. Joseph’s story and the gospels alike show a God who delights to use the worst things to produce the best things. That doesn’t make life’s hells less than hellish. But it does make them bearable.


Filed Under: cancer, chengdu, china, myanmar, suffering

Comments

further to Aquaman's perceptive observations re Job, I've always wanted to write a book on Job entitled "S**t Happens!" but probably nobody would publish it under that title, (altho come to think of it, I haven't tried Moody Press yet!) I've noticed in preaching/teaching that when you strongly infer that "s**t happens" in the lives of believers, nobody ever seems to need you to clarify your point.

Canucklehead, I would definitely go for a Catholic publisher on that one.
I do not know the purpose of suffering - I am thinking about those thousands of people in China, the hundreds of thousand in Myamar (sp), the young family in southern Missouri who were killed in their car during a Tornada yesterday, Aquaman's little girl, my own child's cancer and long term health issues, David's tumor, the clinic in Uganda - there is something about awareness of another's suffering that makes my humanity a better thing, that perhaps makes clear that we are created in God's image. Today one of my most socially awkward students gave a presentation. One of those kids who eats alone, makes the wrong comment at every turn. The class - all of them - you could feel their care for this kid. They wanted her to do well. Her suffering and aloneness were theirs. It was a clear moment of knowing why such things exist. A socially awkward teenager standing in front of a class is one small thing, but suffering is suffering - we tend to think of it in degrees. The aura of compassion that responds - ah - there is where God exists for us all to see. I suppose God calls us to see it and respond to it.


Phil,

Too many Christians believe that people who suffer aren't praying hard enough, aren't being virtuous enough, or otherwise did something (or failed to do something) to merit their suffering. It's comforting to those who don't suffer-- by virtue of their (supposed) righteousness, they are assured that such suffering could never be visited upon them; also, it justifies their decision to separate themselves from the suffering of others. Few Christians would express this belief system so starkly, but it underlies a lot of mainstream Christian thinking, especially among those who profess the so-called "prosperity gospel."

I'm not an expert on ancient Judaism, but if this type of thinking is prevalent today among Christians, in spite of Jesus's example as a suffering servant, I have to imagine such thinking was also prevalent during the period when Job was written.

Understood in this context, the purpose of Job's story is not to vindicate God (who requires no vindication), but to condemn those who would pass judgment on those who suffer. In fact, Job suffers precisely because he is virtuous; if he had been an ordinary man, God and Satan presumably would have found another subject for their wager. The outrageousness of the wager (which most of us would consider a literary device, rather than historic fact) serves to underline the unsearchability of God's ways and the futility of judging God by human standards.

Why is this comforting? I can only answer for myself.

For me, it's comforting to know that my most difficult questions have no answers. It's comforting to know that when bad things happen to me, it isn't (always) my fault.

I can't count how many well-meaning Christians responded to the story of my daughter by saying "everything happens for a reason"-- which, when you deconstruct it, usually means "God struck your daughter with this terrible disease to help you become a better person." Job teaches me that I can confidently dismiss such rubbish as a misguided understanding of the Christian faith. That's comforting to me, too.

I don't expect that I changed your mind, Phil, but I hope you understand that there are more layers to the story than your (understandable) reaction that "God [is] a total prick."

Peace.

Canucklehead, Thornton Wilder wrote it already but called it The Bridge of San Luis Rey.

"Tonight my father called a cousin in Chengdu who, we discovered with relief, is fine. His reports about the incredible destruction at the earthquake's epicenter were anything but comforting."

I'm glad your cousin is ok.

I believe that this world is the result of separation (i.e., the fall). God works through us to alleviate that suffering. Beyond that, I don't think we can really find meaning in this world.
I'm amazed at the notion of intelligent design as a means to convert folks to Christianity.. Yeah, there's incredible patterns, but among random activity patterns seem bound to emerge. If you read the works of C.S. Lewis, he even notes that the physical universe would incline him towards atheism.
Nietzsche has cutting criticsm for flower power/hippie trippie notions about nature. Nature is burtal.
Still consciousness peaks through.
I think we should look beyond religious conversion and hope to convert people to God. The most blatant activity of God appears to me to happen in our consciousness and in our hearts.

One book in particular I've enjoyed is "When Bad Things Happen to Good People" by Rabbi Harold S Kushner. He has an interesting perspective on Job.

Jewish mysticism (remember the Jews are the forefathers of our Christian faith) in the form of Cabala has answered some questions as well. In this arena I recommend "The Secret Life of God" by Rabbi David Aaron. He presents some particularly interesting notions of non-duality on pages 91-92 of my edition.

Even still, I come back to the COURSE IN MIRACLES notion that this life is bad dream that we should look to turn into a good dream via forgiveness and love. Our position with God is solidified through grace.

Inside the dream we can enjoy things in a relative way. That's appropriate.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?


(won't be made public)



Ad tag

Advertisement

Search

About J-Walking

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from J-Walking
Enter your email address below.

Most Emailed Articles