Which is the country’s local culture most beset by moral confusion, New England or the Pacific Northwest? Seattle icon Knute Berger at Crosscut notes a fascinating contrast between these two regions that are America’s top strongholds of secularism:
In New England…same-sex marriage is being legalized. It was signed into law in Vermont and is recognized in Massachusetts and Connecticut. It has not been implemented yet in any Northwest state. On the other hand, the only two states in the country that have legalized assisted suicide are Washington and Oregon. We lag behind on gay marriage, but are way out front on the right to die. Why?
New England Nones come from a tradition of egalitarianism and…there is sympathy across the political spectrum for laws that are equalizers. Marriage equality would have that kind of appeal. In Vermont, both Republicans and Democrats supported making it legal.
In the Northwest, however, we have a strong strain of frontier libertarianism still, an attitude that also bridges traditional party affiliations. There’s a suspicion of authority and institutions, not simply religious ones. Community, nurtured in New England, is somewhat suspect here, but arguments in favor of giving an individual control over his or her fate with legalized suicide would have strong appeal.
So while Nones, from New England’s town hall communitarians to the Pacific Northwest’s Microsoft libertarians, might agree that answers to civic issues won’t be found in church or the Bible, that doesn’t mean they have identical public policy priorities.
posted April 28, 2009 at 8:08 pm
I might also point out that New England has the country’s lowest divorce and out-of-wedlock-childbearing rates. The highest rates are in the South, home of the Bible Belt and generally the most conservative part of the nation. The South also has the highest rate of pornography consumption. Interesting food for thought.
posted April 28, 2009 at 8:25 pm
You might indeed point it out
. However, the factoid about the South and pornography has been ably deconstructed by James Taranto at the Wall Street Journal:
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB123601531011211321-search.html?KEYWORDS=south+and+pornography&COLLECTION=wsjie/6month
posted April 28, 2009 at 8:48 pm
Who the hell are you to judge moral decay? Last time I checked Scripture, God was the only judge. Are you arrogating powers of prophecy for yourself? Are you so presumptive to think that you can discern the will of the Creator for, not only yourself, but for everyone else. It’s strikes me as the height of arrogance and a sure fire recipe for damnation if there ever was one
posted April 30, 2009 at 2:53 pm
“A question we could discuss is which symptom of moral confusion — approving same-sex marriage, approving assisted suicide — is more indicative of underlying currents of decay.”
We could discussion your assertion, but it would be a waste of breath and/or bandwidth. Many, if not most, of us simply do not accept that allowng gay citizens to be treated equally before the law is “moral confusion” or “indicative of underlying currents of decay”. (What are you, Rod Dreher’s mentee? Decline and fall of civilization here we come, eh? G’ee us a brrreak, sonny.)
We see that statement as nothing more than your religious ideology. Well guess what? We don’t all go to your church.
“Moralesque” = truthiness here. Beware.