Kingdom of Priests

How to Write Comedy for Comedy Central

Thursday June 11, 2009

Categories: News & Politics
Our first-grader, Ezra, recently boasted that his buddy Baruch taught him how to be "sarcastic." The secret? You say the opposite of what you really think, drawing it out in a slightly lower pitched voice, while rolling your eyes up and making quote marks with your fingers right by the tips of your ears. For example, Ezra might say while wiggling his fingers like little antlers above his head, "Yea-ah, I rea-al-ly li-ike ve-eg-ge-ta-ables." This represents the height of wit in the first grade.

So too, apparently, at Comedy Central where blogger Dennis DiClaudio takes a stab at my post on the evolutionary thinking of the suspect in the Holocaust Museum shooting, James von Brunn. I think DiClaudio has been getting comedy hints from Ezra's pal Baruch.

He writes:

Wow. Somebody hurry up and invent an Einstein Award for Excellence in the Field of Thinking, because this Klinghoffer guy totally deserves it.

He has clearly proven that if a person "draws lessons" (otherwise known as completely misrepresenting an idea so as to create a bull---t justification for a flawed and hateful belief system) from a thing, that thing becomes completely responsible the person's actions.

Clearly, this DiClaudio guy has a bright future ahead on Jon Stewart's writing staff. And no, I'm not being sarcastic.

Advertisement
Comments
Glen Davidson
June 11, 2009 11:03 AM
http://electricconsciousness.tripod.com

Yes, the original was sufficiently ridiculous that a parody of it falls flat.

Glen Davidson
http://tinyurl.com/6mb592

Brian Beckman
June 11, 2009 12:32 PM

They used to say "punning is the lowest form of humor" but I think sarcasm is. It's cheap, cowardly, self-indulgent hostility from the weak. It's hit-and-run. It's pure destruction, causing the target to waste decoding time. But that's not what I really think about it :)

Brian Beckman
June 11, 2009 2:12 PM

Name-calling, false associations, guilt-by-association (false or not), and smearing are also unimpressive forms of rhetoric, right up there with sarcasm :)

Joel
June 12, 2009 8:23 PM

I absolutely disagree your link between Darwin and this guy, but DiClaudio's comeback was not funny and was barely coherent. That falls under the definately-not-worth-my-time list.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Kingdom of Priests

About Kingdom of Priests

David Klinghoffer is an author and senior fellow in the Religious, Liberty & Public Life program at the Discovery Institute. His writing has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, the National Review, the Weekly Standard, and the Jewish Forward. A California native, he currently lives on Mercer Island, Washington, with his wife and five children.

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.