Kingdom of Priests

Recently in Life's Origins & Evolution Category

Tuesday October 13, 2009

Genesis and the Scandal of Jewish Indifference

A couple of weeks ago I got an email from an editor at a Jewish publication soliciting from me an article "related to creationism." He asked that it be pegged to the coming Sabbath when Jews across the spectrum of Judaism begin a new cycle of Torah readings. That cycle begins with the account of creation in Genesis.

The editor seemingly wasn't aware that I'm not a creationist (i.e., a naïve Biblical literalist), or he didn't know what the word means, or who knows what. Anyway, I wrote and sent off to him the piece he seemed to urgently want, suspecting even as I did so that it would never run in this particular publication. The Jewish religious world -- from Haredi to Reform and just about everything in between -- is in general so scandalously indifferent and ignorant on issues relating to life's origins and evolution that I felt there was a strong possibility whatever I wrote would never get past editorial scrutiny. Sure enough, a week and a half went by without a response from my correspondent. Finally, asked for a status update, the editor told me it likely wouldn't be appearing in their pages.

So with the relevant Sabbath approaching this coming Saturday, I offer to you the piece I wrote:

Orthodox Jews have almost a sixth sense for feeling out of place. Many of us know this experience: On a visit to an unfamiliar city, you head into a restaurant that you have been assured is strictly kosher. On entering, you look around at the crowd of diners, expecting to see identifiably religious Jews -- men wearing kippot -- but there are none. Uneasy, you ask to see the establishment's kosher certification. Maybe the place is no longer under rabbinic supervision? Maybe you're in the wrong restaurant altogether. The manager produces a piece of paper with a rabbi's name on it, which looks legitimate. And yet...something doesn't sit right.

If there are no frum Jews there, could it really be kosher? That is a question I'm often asked by other Jews of all stripes, if not in exactly those words, about what I do in my professional life. And what is that? Do I work as a pork butcher? As the door attendant at a radical Muslim mosque? No, I'm a senior fellow at a think tank, the Discovery Institute, well known for supporting research in intelligent design -- the scientific critique of and alternative to Darwinian evolution. 

At first glance, you might think nothing could be more Jewish. Very shortly Jews around the world will be celebrating a new yearly cycle of Torah readings, beginning with Genesis, the parsha of Bereishit, narrating God's creation of the world. Like Shabbat, which similarly recalls the primordial sequence of divine creativity, studying Bereishit again is a time to re-center ourselves as Jews on a truth that today is widely forgotten or denied. 

That truth is that we live in a world bearing testimony to purposeful design. The very idea is under widespread, influential attack from Darwinists who insist overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrates that life originated and developed as the product of blind, churning, purposeless natural forces. Answering the challenge is a scientific pursuit, but it has spiritual implications as well, just as Darwinism has its own implications that rule out purpose, meaning or design in life's history.

Many Jews, however, including many on the more liberal end of the Orthodox spectrum, see intelligent design as a purely Christian undertaking, with no support from Jewish tradition. The Wall Street Journal has promoted as a representative Jewish view that of Yeshiva University biologist Carl Feit "who is an ordained rabbi and Talmudic scholar.... Prof. Feit says that in nearly a quarter-century of teaching introductory biology, he has always taught evolution -- supported by traditional Jewish source material -- and that 'there has never been a blip on the radar here.' His assessment echoes the official line of the Modern Orthodox rabbinical association, which states that evolution is entirely consistent with Judaism."

Tuesday October 6, 2009

God's Image in Man's Face -- and Hands and Feet, Too!

Jews who want to embrace Darwinism must at the very least tie themselves up into one very tight kosher pretzel if they don't also want to jettison their allegiance to Judaism, or to intellectual and spiritual coherence, in the process.

A while back I posted on the physical way that God's image or tzelem is reflected in the human face. As always, some readers who didn't want to go there found this offensive. Let them now take up the matter with Rashi.

The earlier context was the incoherent mishmash called "theistic evolution," an idea that seeks hopelessly to reconcile Darwinism with traditional theism. Theistic evolutionists don't mind thinking that God didn't quite care what kind of intelligent being arose from the evolutionary process -- could have been a brainy dinosaur, a smart squid, or something monstrous we can only dare to imagine. According to guys like Kenneth Miller or Francis Collins, God simply set a cosmic evolutionary process in motion (or maybe not even that) and let nature take its course, wherever and whatever that might be. This is supposed to be satisfying to a theist, whether Christian or Jewish. I showed that Judaism can't readily be reconciled with such divine indifference to the form of our bodies.

Monday October 5, 2009

"Chariots of the Gods" as a Challenge to Darwin? Or a Support to Richard Dawkins?

When I was a kid with a big imagination and a taste for mystery, a defining experience was seeing the classic speculative documentary Chariots of the Gods, based on Erich von Daniken's spooky book of the same name claiming to prove that ancient astronauts visited the earth. I hadn't seen the film since 1972 and on a nostalgia kick the other day I checked it out of the local library. It's as creepy as I vaguely recalled -- I was 7 when I saw it, I believe in a drive-in theater in Torrance, California, with my parents. Why they took me, I don't know.

Anyway, what's interesting is I noticed this time around that the cover on the DVD package tries to position the film as a challenge to, of all things, Darwin: "Charles Darwin maintained that man was descended from apes. Erich von Daniken countered with his own astonishing theory: 'We are not descended from apes, but from gods!'" By "gods," he meant a superior alien civilization.

Curiously this puts Von Daniken in a broad sense on the same page with Darwinian biologist and bestselling atheist Richard Dawkins, author of the new book The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. Dawkins of course argues for man's sharing a bloodline with apes but he is willing to entertain the idea that life on earth was intelligently designed only if the intelligent designers were space aliens. He said just that in an interview with Ben Stein in the 2008 documentary film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed:

Wednesday September 2, 2009

Fleeing the Ritual Contamination of "Creationism"

The imbroglio over editorial policy at Bloggingheads.tv would be of minor interest if it didn't present such an evocative window on the psychology of the Darwin-believing community. Did you ever think about what actually drives these people?

To recap: Robert Wright, the site's editor-in-chief, was out of the shop when his staff pulled down an interview, six hours after it was put up, between linguist John McWhorter and biochemist Michael Behe. Somehow, pressure was applied to McWhorter resulting in his actually issuing a public apology. He was forced to cringe and beg forgiveness. Anyone could see the reason he had given offense: McWhorter in the interview expressed undisguised admiration for Behe's specialty in the intelligent design field, irreducible complexity. When Wright returned, he reversed the move and restored Behe/McWhorter. The lesson to be drawn is that were it not for Wright's doing the decent thing, then intelligent-design advocate Behe would have remained censored. Whoever intimidated McWhorter would have won the day -- illustrating a dynamic well known to ID sympathizers in the academic science world, and in intellectual life in general. When it comes to intelligent design, silence is the safe policy. The preferable strategy is to align your view with Darwinian orthodoxy.

The next act has involved more public pronouncements -- this time from disgruntled science contributors to Bloggingheads: physicist Sean Carroll and science writer Carl Zimmer. The two participated in a conference call with Wright, demanding that he formulate a policy that would never again allow a "creationist" to speak for himself on Bloggingheads. Wright knows the difference between creationism and intelligent design -- he articulated it nicely in a 2002 article in Time magazine. Carroll and Zimmer seemingly don't. That or they prefer to use the more inflammatory language to refer to Behe, who merely disputes the mechanism of evolution.

As he wrote in a comment on Carroll's blog, Wright wasn't pleased either by the McWhorter interview or by another with Paul Nelson, but he was unwilling to capitulate and make the blanket promise that Carroll and Zimmer wanted, forever to exclude from attention anyone who dissents from evolutionary dogma. So both men wrote preening, self-congratulatory declarations on their blogs that they were through with Bloggingheads. They quit.

Carroll wanted "a slightly more elevated brand of discourse." He wrote, "Certainly none of we [sic] scientists who were disturbed that the dialogue existed in the first place ever asked that it be removed." Yet it should never have been posted. An ID advocate could speak on Bloggingheads if he has "respectable thoughts" on other subjects. But not on ID. That would create a "connection with a brand," that brand would be shared by the "creationist" and Sean Carroll, and that would not be acceptable. Participants should be "serious people." Some years ago he "declined an invitation" to a Templeton Foundation conference because "I didn't want to be seen" at such an event. Harry Kroto was disappointed "that I would sully myself" by indirect Templeton connections. And no wonder: "we all have to look at ourselves in the mirror."

Monday August 24, 2009

The Enigma of Adoption

If I may amplify my previous post on evolutionary psychology, we're supposed to be believe that DNA, while directing only the production of proteins and other cell components, is ultimately in charge of everything else about us too -- as David Berlinski puts it, "altruism, date rape, aggression, eating disorders, and a taste for Mansfield Park," and much else. An infinity of "much else." 

I was adopted and did not meet my birth mother until I was in my mid 20s. She and my adoptive parents have very little in common -- not religion, not background, not country of origin, not tastes. Almost nothing. (You can read more about the story in my first book, The Lord Will Gather Me In.) I inherited from my adoptive parents many culturally rooted preferences. Of course I did. But I inherited from my birth mother other things, as I've come to realize over the years since we developed a relationship. Hair color and complexion. Yeah sure, big deal. But also attitudes, habits, tastes -- not for Mansfield Park but Graham Greene, whom she was reading when pregnant with me, for one example. Just a lot of things that if you're Robert Wright, you'd have to assume were granted through the coded language of DNA, a language that codes for cell components and nothing else

This is what I mean by magical thinking.

Monday August 24, 2009

The Magical Thinking Behind Evolutionary Psychology

I like Robert Wright and enjoyed his recent book The Evolution of God. One thing I value about him is his candor. Thus in his New York Times op-ed yesterday proposing a "grand bargain" between religion and science (i.e., Darwinism),...

Thursday August 20, 2009

Ibn Ezra Agrees: An "Apikoros" (Heretic) Is One Who Rejects Intelligent Design

For those who were wondering about my immediately previous entry: When the classical Torah commentator Abraham ibn Ezra spoke of a "heretic" who challenges the simple in faith about God's existence, but who gets an adequate response only from the...

Wednesday August 19, 2009

Ibn Ezra on Intelligent Design and the First Commandment

For those who think that finding evidence of design in nature is a Christian preoccupation, not a Jewish one, the hits just keep coming. Abraham ibn Ezra (1089-1164) is one of a handful of the most important classical commentators on the...

Monday August 17, 2009

Darwinist Faithful Indirectly Affirm Darwin-Hitler Link

A surprising if indirect affirmation of the Darwin-Hitler connection has been offered by the Darwinist faithful over at Panda's Thumb. Yes, you read that right.The argument made by scholars like Richard Weikart and Benjamin Wiker traces an intellectual genealogy from...

Sunday August 9, 2009

Charles Manson, Evolutionist

Today and tomorrow mark the 40th anniversary of the murders that made Charles Manson an icon of evil. In Helter Skelter, prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi writes about his interviews with talent scout Gregg Jakobson, who spent many hours, over the course...

Friday August 7, 2009

The Hollowness of Conservatism Under Darwinism's Sway

Sometimes the hollowness of contemporary conservatism gets me down. An earlier figure in the conservative tradition, Whittaker Chambers, began his journey up from Communism one morning when he was feeding his little daughter and he noticed her ear. Suddenly he...

Friday July 24, 2009

Darwinists and Their Strategy of Intimidation

Some commenters on an earlier post have expressed doubt that believers in Darwinism seek to intimidate dissenters. Give me a break! Of course that's exactly what Darwinists try to do whether in academic life or in the humbler context of...

Tuesday July 21, 2009

A Challenge to Intelligent Design-Bashing Regulars on this Blog

You know who you are. Rather than go on grousing about how there's no evidence for intelligent design, it's not science, and so on and so forth, here's my challenge to you personally. Read Stephen C. Meyer's new book, Signature...

Thursday July 16, 2009

Necromancy and Alzheimer's Among Darwin Faithful

That's my subject at Evolution News & Views, where I take on a response to the Thomas Jefferson/intelligent design connection from University of Chicago biologist Jerry A. Coyne. Read the rest there. Excerpt below:On his blog, Coyne lashes out at "young-earth...

Wednesday July 15, 2009

Boston Globe, Den of Theocracy!

There must be a nest of theocrats over at the Boston Globe, ready to spring Christianist rule on us all. Someone call Andrew Sullivan! On today's op-ed page they publish Stephen C. Meyer who argues that if you like the Declaration of Independence,...

Tuesday July 14, 2009

Ode on a Grecian Flypaper Strip

Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? This bears upon our earlier discussion of whether a horribly vile Lovecraftian creature would satisfy God as the ultimate product of an undirected process of evolution as imagined by Darwin. Impoverished island-dwelling...

Friday July 10, 2009

H.P. Lovecraft, Darwinism's Visionary Storyteller

Picture a majestic T. rex receiving the tablets of the Ten Commandments in its undersized forelimbs, or an elegant octopus crucified on an old rugged cross with four crossbars instead of one.Such images are what Kenneth Miller presumably has in...

Tuesday July 7, 2009

Jewish Mysticism Meets Intelligent Design: Whose Signature in the Cell?

My op-ed in the Jerusalem Post today discusses the eerie anticipation of ideas about the genetic code by Jewish mysticism, or kabbala. I cite the Tanya (1796) but the tradition on this -- creation through the combination of letters --...

Monday June 29, 2009

How Evolution's Co-Discoverer Came to Doubt Darwin in Favor of Intelligent Design

That's right, Alfred Russel Wallace. I've got a two-part interview with the author of a very interesting new book that tells the story over at Evolution News & Views. (UPDATE: An AP story that you can read at MSNBC recalls...

Wednesday June 24, 2009

Strip Clubs v. Darwinism

With a strange regularity, it happens that readers who haven't read the subtitle of this blog will object in the comments box that I don't seem to offer new scientific evidence for intelligent design or against Darwinism. They assume that's...

Tuesday June 23, 2009

If the Children of Israel Were Giant Squid

Purportedly religion-friendly Darwinists like genome scientist Francis Collins and biologist Kenneth Miller get a lot of mileage out of reassuring the faith community that Darwinism poses no threat to traditional religion. As I noted the other day, neither thinks it...

Monday June 22, 2009

Are Humans In God's Image? Even Darwinists like Francis Collins Say, Effectively, No

When you look at your face in the mirror, is what you see the stamp of God's own image -- not His face, because He doesn't have a face or a body or any physical aspect, but His spiritual image?...

Thursday June 18, 2009

When Cultures Collide in "The Pit of Hell"

I did a radio interview today with a fellow down in Texas who had a real preacher's style. Entertaining guy but at one point he asked, letting his voice rise and rise like he was at the pulpit, "David, would...

Thursday June 18, 2009

Messianic Judaism & Theistic Evolution

It is, of course, the comparison that only this blog would dare to make. But isn't it obvious? Messianic Jews, of whom we spoke in the previous entry, think you can coherently believe in Jesus and Judaism. Theistic evolutionists think...

Tuesday June 16, 2009

Darwin's (Failed) Predictions

Over at Evolution News & Views, I have a two-parter up on Darwinism's failed predictions, an interview with molecular biophysicist Cornelius Hunter, that I recommend to you. Excerpt:The testability of scientific ideas by making predictions about reality is a favorite theme...

Friday June 5, 2009

Jeremiah on Theistic Evolution

I can't leave the discussion about the religious reconcilers of God and Darwin without quoting Jeremiah on false prophets (6:13-16), who plied their trade by going up and down among the people telling them exactly what they wanted to hear:...

Friday June 5, 2009

Are Religious Liberals Useful Idiots or Just Idiots? Darwinists Debate

An enjoyable internal squabble has been going on in the overlapping New Atheist and Darwinian communities. The intensity level just went up a notch. One faction thinks religious liberals are useful to the cause, scientifically and politically, and should be...

Monday June 1, 2009

When and Why Anti-Darwinism First Arose

I'm a big fan of Rod Dreher. His Crunchy Con blog rarely fails to enlighten me, so I've been looking forward to his reflections on faith and science, generated by his current visit to Cambridge University as a Cambridge-Templeton fellow....

Thursday May 28, 2009

A Fog Over the Intelligent Design Debate

A pair of dueling websites, one that just went live, are engaged in an important argument over whether religious believers should continue to be fed the "opium of the people." That's the famous phrase Marx Karl used to deride all...

Wednesday May 20, 2009

A Jaundiced Eye on Ida

You'll forgive me if I cast a somewhat jaundiced eye on Ida, evolution's latest supposed missing link. Yet when the old girl is found gracing even the front page of Google, you know it's a phenomenon that at least deserves...

Tuesday May 19, 2009

Where Theistic Evolution Leads

Some readers thought I was unfair in a previous entry explaining the difference between my perspective on evolution and that of my fellow Beliefnet blogger Dr. Francis Collins over at Science and the Sacred. Am I really not being fair?...

Monday May 18, 2009

Fond Dreams of BioLogos

Astute readers will have noticed that Beliefnet runs two blogs that deal with evolution on a more or less frequent basis but in very different ways: this blog and Science and the Sacred, where former Human Genome Project head Francis Collins...

Tuesday May 5, 2009

A "Secular Inquisition" on Behalf of Darwinism

Melanie Phillips has another terrific post about the "Secular Inquisition" being waged on behalf of Darwinism. When will they start stoning Intelligent Design advocates?She begins this way:The response to my post below on Intelligent Design has provided illuminating and revealing...

Friday May 1, 2009

Intelligent Design or the Dreaded "Creationism"?

On the Darwin debate, minds are opening in England in some very prominent places. First, A.N. Wilson affirmed the Darwin-Hitler connection. Now at the London Spectator, Melanie Phillips, author of Londonistan, rebukes Darwinists for deceiving the public by persistently conflating intelligent...

Wednesday April 29, 2009

What You Don't Hear from the Media about Evolution

How fascinating -- the underreported revelation of modern evolutionary, genetic, and DNA science -- that physical, material causes are not enough to explain the history of life's evolution and development -- was understood by the rabbis more than a millennium...

Monday April 27, 2009

A.N. Wilson on the Darwin-Hitler Connection

A.N. Wilson goes into more fascinating detail about his return to religious faith from atheism in an essay in the New Statesman. Now isn't this interesting: the literary critic, biographer and historian credits his gradual re-conversion in no small part...

Friday April 24, 2009

Darwin's Three Monkeys: Science Has Spoken!

My post from Monday "Slouching Toward Columbine: Darwin's Tree of Death" continues to get comments, many poignantly indignant expressions of faith in "science":What matters is the evidence for evolution and that evidence is massive and extremely powerful. The facts of...

Tuesday April 21, 2009

Darwin's Tree of Death: My Reply to Readers

Responding to my post on the Columbine shooting and the social consequences of Darwinism, some objecting readers argued that the Bible, after all, has also inspired evil acts. Which is true, of course, but misses the point. Biblical faith has...

Monday April 20, 2009

Slouching Toward Columbine: Darwin's Tree of Death

 I've long been fascinated by the image of the Tree of Death, parallel to the Tree of Life in the Garden of Eden and cryptically referred to in mystical texts explaining the Hebrew Bible:And out of the ground made the...

Tuesday April 14, 2009

A.N. Wilson, Darwin Doubter

My Beliefnet colleague and friend Rod Dreher notes the return to Christianity of A.N. Wilson, a writer I've long admired greatly. He's a novelist, biographer, and literary editor. Rod is glad and I am too but I'm more interested in...

Sunday April 5, 2009

Judaism in the Year of Darwin

Thanks and congratulations to the editors of Mishpacha, a popular Orthodox Jewish magazine, for marking this year of Darwin anniversaries with a frank look at Darwinism's cultural consequences. The author is also the author of this blog. I note the...

Advertisement

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Kingdom of Priests

About Kingdom of Priests

David Klinghoffer is an author and senior fellow in the Religious, Liberty & Public Life program at the Discovery Institute. His writing has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, the National Review, the Weekly Standard, and the Jewish Forward. A California native, he currently lives on Mercer Island, Washington, with his wife and five children.

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.