Lynn v. Sekulow

McCain Chooses Pro-Life, Conservative Christian Woman as VP Running Mate

Friday August 29, 2008

Categories: Abortion, Courts, Election '08
Sen. John McCain is announcing that he has selected Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his Vice Presidential Running Mate. Gov. Palin is now the second female vice-presidential candidate to represent one of the major parties.   Social conservatives are pleased...
Advertisement
Comments
Jordan
August 29, 2008 1:02 PM

I called in to ask this question on Jay Sekulow Live, but they ran out of time before they could get to my call. I was wondering if you think this selection was made to pull some of the female voters from the Clinton fan-base, and also if the fact that she is a woman may turn off some male voters?
Thanks, and God Bless.

Jordan

FROM ALASKA!!

ds0490
August 29, 2008 1:09 PM

It will also be interesting to see how an ethics investigation turns out in her state. Seems that she has been accused of dismissing the state public safety head when he refused to fire her ex-brother-in-law. If that turns against her it will tarnish her reputation as a reformer and put her right in the middle of what is turning out to be one of the most corrupt group of Republicans in any state.

This is a huge risk. For many reasons it could backfire for McCain. But it puts the honus on the evangelicals to put up for shut up. She is one of them...this is the result of their pressure. If she tanks the ticket it will be their fault.

Janet Bucknell
August 29, 2008 1:39 PM

Have you folks been able to discover what denomination of Christianity Governor Balin espouses? What church does she actually attend?
thanks,
jb

Paul, seeking wisdom
August 29, 2008 2:34 PM

You are aware of course that the Democrats will paint Palin as a"gun-loving, big oil momma" and that her experience as Governor of Alaska has no bearing on her ability to govern the Nation.

The fact that her stand on the environment is questionable, her knowledge of foreign affairs is null and her identity with the working, single mother is void of any understanding will not help her win women who live in the inner cities.

She is a fine lady and a wonderful mother but is she qualified to lead America if McCain should die in office? That is the question that can not be answered at this time. Sure the NRA,Big Oil and the Pro-lifers love her but that is not enough to deal with all the problems that we ave with high crime, lost jobs, weaken foreign relations and an unpopular war. She only adds to the campaign what we know McCain already had.

I would hope that because she has a special needs child, that she would support those mothers who have the same needs as she has but do not have the support of the Republican Leadership and could enact change. What I fear is that she will do the same as McCain and abandon the ideas once held and sink into the pockets of the obscene rich and powerful who rape America and leave us broke and hungry for change.

randy
August 29, 2008 2:43 PM

If she is so "pro-life" why did she have the prenatal test in the first place? Again conservative double talk.

Peter
August 29, 2008 3:18 PM

Jefferson's references to god were not Christian. He was a deist.

There's nothing wrong with a Christian heritage week but let’s be clear on one thing: this is a week celebrating the heritage of the dominant group who is privileged in this nation. It is not the intellectual or moral equivalent of Black History Month, or Women’s History Month which exist to highlight the groups that are the targets of domination in this country.

aaron
August 29, 2008 3:28 PM

If she is so "pro-life" why did she have the prenatal test in the first place? Again conservative double talk.

How is that double-talk? The scare quotes are nonsensical as well.

David Kees
August 29, 2008 3:29 PM

"If she is so "pro-life" why did she have the prenatal test in the first place? Again conservative double talk." -- randy (above)

I don't think it's pro-life or pro-choice to have a prenatal test. Frankly, they might have wanted to know what sort of needs -- special or otherwise -- their new child would require upon his birth.

I'm interested, too, in seeing what fall out comes from her support of aerial hunting of wolves as a method to increase the caribou herds in Alaska will be, not to mention her lawsuit brought against the US government for adding Polar Bears to the endangered (or threatened, I misremember) species list.

Glen Fine
August 29, 2008 4:26 PM

Well, we drift from what Jay is trying to ignite here. Any Governor, or Mayor can make proclamations for anything, whether it is religious or not.

So this lady proclaims something with a religious context. There is no mandate or law to force compliance or participation. People can celebrate it or not.

Now if she added that a Christian prayer was to be said over the loudspeakers of all the schools during the period of the proclamation, or force people to pray, or get fired, then there may be some hay to thrash around.

Edicts, Mandates, Ordinances, or Laws are the only objects that can cause a Constitutional collision.

Nice try, Jay. But I hope the Rev sees this the same way I do. Innocuous and not worthy of any more discussion.

Dee
August 29, 2008 4:37 PM

"If she is so "pro-life" why did she have the prenatal test in the first place? Again conservative double talk." 2:43

Easily one of the most ludicrous statements Ive ever heard! With all the ridiculous arguments that go back and forth, THIS one actually stunned me. FYI: Prenatal testing is testing for diseases or conditions in a fetus or embryo before it is born. The aim is to detect birth defects such as neural tube defects, Down syndrome, chromosome abnormalities, genetic diseases and other conditions. It can also be used to determine the sex of the unborn baby.

What about checking the health or sex of your baby prior to birth negates being pro-life???? If anything inquiry into the well being of their life BEFORE they are born reinforces her pro-life stance! 80% of parents who find out they will have a down syndrome baby, abort their child. 80%! The fact that she KNEW there was a birth defect and STILL had the child, again, reinforces her strong belief in the value of human life, at any stage, at any cost!

Liz
August 29, 2008 6:56 PM

How can she in good conscience do this huge job with a disabled infant? Who will be caring for the baby? She could be President with onequick misfortune! This isn't Alaska, where her kids can play at her feet in the office...

I am a feminist in many ways but as a mother, my family values take priority, and I just can't get past this...

Boris
August 29, 2008 9:45 PM

I doubt Sarah Palin, because of her beliefs, thought she even had a choice about having her last child. The problem is that she wants to make it so no one else has a choice whether or not they want to bear a child or not. What Ms. Palin wants to do is force women to undergo a nine month pregnancy they do not want to endure and then give birth to a child they never want to see.

The reason the anti-choice lobby gets such bitter resistance is that it is almost entirely Christian-based. Most pro-choice people simply don't trust religious spokespeople no matter what they are representing. Therefore the Christian anti-choice movement is seen not as being fueled by concern for the unborn but rather a male dominated authoritarian religion attempting to keep power out of the hands of women. It's hard to have sympathy for your opponent when you don't fully understand them. But that goes doubly for the anti-choice people.

Mark
August 30, 2008 11:52 AM

BORIS SAYS "I doubt Sarah Palin, because of her beliefs, thought she even had a choice about having her last child. The problem is that she wants to make it so no one else has a choice whether or not they want to bear a child or not. What Ms. Palin wants to do is force women to undergo a nine month pregnancy they do not want to endure and then give birth to a child they never want to see.(WHICH SHE NEVER SAID)

The reason the anti-choice lobby gets such bitter resistance is that it is almost entirely Christian-based. Most pro-choice people simply don't trust religious spokespeople no matter what they are representing. Therefore the Christian anti-choice movement is seen not as being fueled by concern for the unborn but rather a male dominated authoritarian religion attempting to keep power out of the hands of women. It's hard to have sympathy for your opponent when you don't fully understand them. But that goes doubly for the anti-choice people."

MARK SAYS
This is the one of the most ignorant things I have heard spewed from a Anti-Life person. That is right, Anti-Life. No where, in anything in this article does it say that Sarah Palin will try to reverse Roe v Wade. No where does anything that BORIS is blattering about appear in what this article is about. BORIS is taking a stance of hate and ignorance, being the typical democrate, and using a party platform to ignore the issues. The article talks about her being a loving mother, not a person who is trying to shut down the female owned abortion clinics, where more black children are killed then white. John McCain's choice is bold and fresh. Here is a woman who is as untested as Obama, and yet BORIS seems to want to rant that she is all for taking away rights, and making it sound like the NAZI'S are trying to take control of the country. Why? Is it that BORIS believes in abortion as a form of birth control? Is BORIS on the government dole and just wants to sit back and collect money, and just complain that people don't understand his way of life? BORIS needs to come up and breath fresh air, and understand, what is tearing this country apart is ignorance like his, and being set in ways that just do not work anymore. Anti-Life isn't the way to go. If your life is that bad, then do somethin about it. You have the chance of life, and if you regret it, then talk to your parents, maybe they can fix that problem for you, but do not take it upon your self to be the moral monitor of life, or the lack of it. BORIS is taking issues that don't exist out of this article, just as I am answering to BORIS about what is written, not about the article that shows this is a woman of faith, which BORIS seems to not have, and a woman of conviction, of which BORIS seems to not believe in. So instead of saying, Hey, she is a woman, and as a democrat, I should say good job, and good luck, BORIS chose to make this about nothing but his own personal beliefs and life. That is about as ANTI-LIFE as there is.

Peter
August 30, 2008 1:03 PM

"No where, in anything in this article does it say that Sarah Palin will try to reverse Roe v Wade."

Yea, let's just sit back and trust her to respect reproductive rights. We should trust Christians. Look how trustworthy Bush turned out to be.

Plus, you gotta love a guy who calls someone "anti-life" for supporting reproductive rights but basses his own belief system on the violent murder of an innocent man because of god's decree.

"Kettle, this is Pot! How are ya?"

Above Us Only Sky
August 30, 2008 2:32 PM

Wow, it just always amazes me that religious zealots think they have the right to impose their religious practices on everyone, the ultimate in disrespect fro their fellow Americans. That is exactly what this Palin is all about. While I can respect that she, after searching her conscience, has decided that abortion is not right for her. Fine. No problem. What I can not respect is that, after she searches her conscience, she has decided that everyone must be held to her beliefs by force of law. Abortion is a very difficult personal issue. It requires that people make a personal judgment about the essence of life. The final judgment that every individual renders is not the kind of thing that is subject to scientific verification, it is all guesswork. Why someone like Palin thinks that her guesswork should trump mine is beyond belief. It always come down to the religious thinking they are imbued with special insight and deserves special rights. Pretty tired of the whole thing really.

Jon Rowe
August 31, 2008 10:14 AM

When I go to the official site, it ways object not found. This is important because I've just discovered (and am working on a blog post) that though the underlying quotations are accurate, most of them are misquotes. Check out http://americancreation.blogspot.com in a few hours for a comparison between the originals and Palin's resolution.

Boris
August 31, 2008 2:23 PM

MARK SAYS This is the one of the most ignorant things I have heard spewed from a Anti-Life person. That is right, Anti-Life.

Boris says: This is the one of the most ignorant things I have heard spewed from a Anti-Freedom person. That is right, Anti-Freedom.

MARK SAYS No where, in anything in this article does it say that Sarah Palin will try to reverse Roe v Wade. No where does anything that BORIS is blattering about appear in what this article is about. BORIS is taking a stance of hate and ignorance, being the typical democrate, and using a party platform to ignore the issues.

Boris says: The hypocrisy of neo-cons like this blogger is that they claim they don't want the courts to legislate - unless they are legislating Christian fascism like trying to strike down Roe v Wade.

MARK SAYS The article talks about her being a loving mother, not a person who is trying to shut down the female owned abortion clinics, where more black children are killed then white. John McCain's choice is bold and fresh.

Boris says: Loving mother? Sure. Then she should stay home and take care of her disabled child. The highest calling is parenting - not politics. This woman is Dick Cheney in a dress.

MARK SAYS Here is a woman who is as untested as Obama, and yet BORIS seems to want to rant that she is all for taking away rights, and making it sound like the NAZI'S are trying to take control of the country. Why? Is it that BORIS believes in abortion as a form of birth control? Is BORIS on the government dole and just wants to sit back and collect money, and just complain that people don't understand his way of life?

Boris says: I pay more in taxes than this blogger makes.

MARK SAYS BORIS needs to come up and breath fresh air, and understand, what is tearing this country apart is ignorance like his, and being set in ways that just do not work anymore. Anti-Life isn't the way to go.

Boris says: Only Christians are anti-life as things like the Crusades, Inquisitions, witch burning, the denial of scientific discoveries, the torture and murder of unbelievers, the resistance to social progress and the Holocaust clearly illustrate.

MARK SAYS If your life is that bad, then do somethin about it. You have the chance of life, and if you regret it, then talk to your parents, maybe they can fix that problem for you, but do not take it upon your self to be the moral monitor of life, or the lack of it.
Boris says: My life is great because I'm an atheist, unburdened by fear-induced superstitions and archaic preconceived notions.

MARK SAYS BORIS is taking issues that don't exist out of this article, just as I am answering to BORIS about what is written, not about the article that shows this is a woman of faith, which BORIS seems to not have, and a woman of conviction, of which BORIS seems to not believe in.

Boris says: People of good sense do not trust people of faith.

MARK SAYS So instead of saying, Hey, she is a woman, and as a democrat, I should say good job, and good luck, BORIS chose to make this about nothing but his own personal beliefs and life. That is about as ANTI-LIFE as there is.

Boris says: Again, only Christians are anti-life. I'm not a democrat and I have no personal beliefs because I'm an atheist.

Ann L.
August 31, 2008 10:57 PM

"The fool has said in his heart, "There is no God."
(that's Psalm 53:1 - yeah, that Bible you don't seem to respect any)"
However, there really is a God and the Bible is His 'instruction manual'/textbook for life.

The Bible teaches us while God loves every person, He does not condone sin. Ending an innocent life IS a sin...whether you call it murder, abortion, infanticide, or a 'choice'. No one has the moral/ethical right to 'choose' to kill a baby. And, by the way, I'm not 'anti-choice'...that implies that I'm against choices. I'm not, but...the time for a woman to use her personal judgment (make her choice) has past if the woman is already pregnant. I'm 'pro-life' - I'm 'anti-murder'.

I understand that being in that situation would be a personal crisis and I have tons of compassion for the woman in that situation, but I can't condone her 'so-called right' to kill her son or daughter based on compassion. Referring to the statement implying that Christians want to take power out of the hands of women...no way! A woman has the power to take precautions to keep from becoming pregnant. If it happens anyway, it takes a woman with way more STRENGTH and POWER to go against the PC tide of taking the 'easy way out'...and instead, nurture & give birth to her child and then, if she still doesn't 'choose' the responsibility...allow an infertile couple yearning for a child the joy of adopting hers.

I am a Christian and I don't want to impose my 'religious practices' on anyone. The fact is that we are NOT discussing 'religious practices' ...we're talking about killing babies. Otherwise, I'd say that you can do whatever you choose...as long as it's legal
AND IT'S JUST YOU who's involved. With abortion, there IS another life involved that needs protection -and- that Truth won't change no matter how much you wish it would.

RE: "How can she [Palin] in good conscience do this huge job with a disabled infant? Who will be caring for the baby?"
I'm raising a (differently) disabled child myself...AND, I know myself well enough to know that I couldn't do it, BUT then, I wouldn't tackle being a governor (even without any children)...it's just not something I'm gifted for. I'd say she knows very well what she can handle...she seems to have a good support system...and to have an 80% favorable rating as Governor on top of that - well, sounds like she must be doing a pretty good job to me.

Closer to the topic...I think McCain made a great choice. From what I've learned of Palin so far, I think she'll be a very good compliment for him...being a strength in areas where I felt he wasn't a great choice (although still a better one than the opposition). I LOVE the Proclamation! It is the truth and I say to anyone who thinks that it's unconstitutional...then you shouldn't observe Independence Day either...both are rememberances of the character and beliefs that this nation was founded on! What could be more constitutional ? ? ?

Boris
September 1, 2008 12:50 AM

Ann I didn't get on this blog to discuss what the Bible says about this subject but since you brought it up:

Ann said: "The fool has said in his heart, "There is no God."
(that's Psalm 53:1 - yeah, that Bible you don't seem to respect any)"

Boris says: This is just one of the Bible's many defenses against free inquiry and critical thinking. It's a wonder people can't see through that charade.

Ann said: However, there really is a God and the Bible is His 'instruction manual'/textbook for life.

Boris says: You mean these instructions?

You must kill those who worship another god. Exodus 22:20

Kill any friends or family that worship a god that is different than your own. Deuteronomy 13:6-10

Kill all the inhabitants of any city where you find people that worship differently than you. Deuteronomy 13:12-16

Kill everyone who has religious views that are different than your own. Deuteronomy 17:2-7

Kill anyone who refuses to listen to a priest. Deuteronomy 17:12-13

Kill any false prophets. Deuteronomy 18:20

Don’t associate with non-Christians. Don’t receive them into your house or even exchange greeting with them. 2 John 1:10

Shun those who disagree with your religious views. Romans 16:17

Paul, knowing that their faith would crumble if subjected to free and critical inquiry, tells his followers to avoid philosophy. Colossians 2:8

Everyone will have to worship Jesus -- whether they want to or not. Philippians 2:10

j
September 1, 2008 12:46 PM

I just heard on CNN that Balin's unmarried daughter is pregnant!!! I am sure the right wing hypocrits will have a great way to spin out of this juicy news!! Also, isn't it a bit selfish to still be a nursing mother of a special needs child and run for vp? Do we really think she is going to choose between sticking it out in the oval office during the fall out or choose her 5 children to go home and protect?

j.j.t.
September 2, 2008 11:29 AM

Let's call our Christian leaders who put politics ahead of Jesus into accountability. For months we have heard attacks against Barack Obama calling him anything from the anti-christ, to a radical Muslim, to a black militant, to an elitist. Yet within hours of Sarah Palin's announcement as the vice-president pick for John McCain, James Dobson and others praised the pick with rousing endorsements.

Yet if we were to take the same microscope to Palin as with Obama, we would find a completely different story.

1. In the past 2 months, she has stated in an interview that she doesn't know what the VP does.
2. She appeared with Director of Stevens PAC to support him last summer.
3. She supported the "Bridge to Nowhere" legislation before she stated she opposed it in her initial vice president speech.
4. She and her husband were members of the extremist Alaskan Independent Party advocating for the secession of Alaska from the United States.
5. She needed to obtain a passport to visit troops, suggesting almost no foreign travel.
6. She has stated that "Under God" should be kept in the Pledge of Allegiance because of the founding fathers despite the fact that the statement was added in 1948.
7. She is involved in an investigation where she is accused of firing the head of police in her state over a family vendetta.
8. She has stated in interviews that the Iraq war was for oil and hadn't given it much thought despite son's enlistment.
9. She belongs to Assemblies of God church, which Dr. Dobson and others have previously spoken out against.
10. The McCain campaign has issued a statement that as a parent, it is not her fault that her teenage daughter is pregnant.
11. Palin's statement about her daughter's pregnancy states that the couple intend to marry, but the "alleged" father of the child only found out about the pregnancy this weekend through the press release and has made no statement of his intent to marry the daughter.

This list is not intended to attack any of the personal decisions of Sarah Palin. It does not address other rumors that cannot be backed up by any of Palin's or McCain's statements actions. Sarah Palin may or may not be a worthy vice president pick. But for the “Christian” leadership to come out so quickly and get behind her without any information on her exposes their blind faith in men and the Republican party.
Its time to call out our so called Christian leadership that has aligned itself with the Republican party over Jesus. If you can't speak for Jesus when it comes to politics, please stay out of the arena and focus on the "family."

Fr Gregory
September 5, 2008 8:29 AM

While I appreciate Governor Palin's proclamation of Christian Heritage Week, the proclamation leaves unspoken Alaska's own Orthodox Christian roots. The earlier settlers from Russia where Orthodox Christians and, until the start of the Federal government's Americanization programs of the native peoples, many of the native peoples in Alaska were also members of the Orthodox Church. It is one of the saddest moments in American religious history that the US government financed a campaign to rob native Alaskan people not only of their language and culture, but also their Orthodox Christian faith in the service of making them more "American."

Joe
September 7, 2008 10:30 AM

I find some of the whereas clauses, especially those quoting such strict separationists as Jefferson and Madison, annoyingly taken out of context.

Many believed that religion was necessary to a successful republic, including individual believers/citizens regularly taking part in the ceremonies and rituals of their faith.

This does not mean they all wanted OFFICIAL recognition of specific religious paths. I surely don't understand how references to "God" are (on a neutral level) relevant to such an official support to honoring Christianity!

I'm dubious of some national day of prayer or such, but at least there the breadth of beliefs covered are obvious, if not all of them. Here "God" is implied to equal "Christ" and people like Franklin and Jefferson, who truly doubted (at best for the latter, see Jefferson's Bible) that connection used to help things is honestly offensive.

The comment about the state's orthodox history is also rather telling.

David Kessler
September 19, 2008 2:24 AM

I'd consider voting Republican if McCain was Palin's V.P.

N. Lindzee Lindholm
July 11, 2009 5:12 PM

I am glad Gov. Palin has strong values and that she is not afraid to show them in her political life to compliment her personal life. I recognize this nation is made up of people who believe in many different religions, and that is okay. Nonetheless, the US was founded on Judeo-Christian values and still is an overwhelmingly predominant Christian country. Therefore, Christian Heritage Week is appropriate both on a state and national level.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Lynn v. Sekulow

About Lynn v. Sekulow

Lynn v. Sekulow is an ongoing debate blog--a blogalogue--about how big (or little) a role faith and religion should play in American politics and government, featuring the two leading voices of the church/state battle: American Center for Law & Justice Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow and Americans United for Separation of Church and State Executive Director Rev. Barry W. Lynn.

Please note that in discussing political issues, candidates’ positions and political party statements, the Rev. Barry Lynn and Jay Sekulow are offering analysis in their individual capacities as lawyers and commentators. They are not speaking on behalf of Americans United for Separation for Church and State or for the American Center for Law & Justice. Those organizations do not endorse or oppose candidates for public office. Nothing contained in this dialogue should be construed as the positions of the respective organizations.

About the Authors

Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a nonprofit educational organization that defends religious liberty by opposing government interference in religion
» Posts by Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Jay Sekulow
Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization focused on protecting religious freedom, American families, and human life.
» Posts by Jay Sekulow
More »

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.