Lynn v. Sekulow

Here's the Next McCain-Palin Risk: The FRC Conference

Friday September 5, 2008

Next weekend, the far-right-of-center Family Research Council will convene (what else?) a far right conference in Washington DC.  They certainly want both McCain and Palin to show up.  Here's the rub: will these candidates want to risk showing up at the conference?  This was the conference which, in the past, has held workshops in which leaders told attendees to lie to local churches to obtain their mailing lists to be used for partisan purposes.  It was the conference which figured appalling presentations which encouraged hate speech against gay Americans and  supported torture of suspected terrorists.  Those speakers made moderate Christians long for the old days of Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition gatherings in the l980s and l990s.

So, Jay, should they come?  Or should the Family Research Council just accept on faith that the GOP ticket is a social conservative's dream and give them a pass?
Advertisement
Comments
Liberalism is a Mental Disorder
September 6, 2008 7:15 PM

Where did you post your prayer asking for forgiveness when Hell to Pay Hillary was running or when Bill got elected with a trail of more dead bodies around than one can imagine?

daniel rotter
September 6, 2008 8:51 PM

"Mrs. Palin owes an apology to no one, community organizer or otherwise. If Mr. Hussein tries to ridicule her experience, she has every right to point out that hers excels his."

The second sentence of the above only logically follows the first sentence if one believes that the only community organizer that has ever existed is Mr. Obama ("Hussein" is his middle, not hist last, name).

"...when Bill got elected with a trail of mor dead bodies around than one can imagine".

Name one, libeler.

mordred08
September 7, 2008 6:27 AM

T: "If Mr. Hussein tries to ridicule her experience, she has every right to point out that hers excels his."

If the ghost of Saddam Hussein comes after Palin, maybe Bush can call up the Pope and arrange an exorcism. Oh, wait, I see what's going on. You were making fun of Obama's name like the Republicans have been doing since day one for lack of a better strategy. My mistake.

N. Lindzee Lindholm
August 17, 2009 10:40 PM

Even though I am a Republican., I do not support unethical practices such as lying to constituents to get a vote. Speaking of such, there has been a lot of this going on by the left concerning the facts around the health care plan. I do not think any public servant should take part in deceptive practices merely to get a vote or see a bill passed. Some such tactics by the left have included outright lying to folks in town hall meetings. Whether or not they didn't know the answer at this point is immaterial. When in doubt, ask. Say that you do not have the information but will be happy to look it up and get back to the person. Two votes were taken in regards to the four abortion amendments in Congress which should not have happened. If the first vote was kept and pressure was not put on folks to change their vote, then abortion would not have been a part of the plan. Pres. Barack tried to speed the 1100 page bill through Congress so a vote would be cast before the August session recess so Senators and Congresspersons would NOT have the chance to read it, nor would the American public have an opportunity to know for sure what specifics were in the bill. These manipulative tactics utilized just to secure a win are unbecoming of public servants. In addition, the public is not stupid. They know what politicians are up to and popularity ratings will be jeopardized. There needs to be a higher ethical standard in the public arena (i.e. stop lying).

Boris
August 17, 2009 11:48 PM

Some such tactics by the left have included outright lying to folks in town hall meetings.

Boris says: Name 'em and claim 'em liar.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Lynn v. Sekulow

About Lynn v. Sekulow

Lynn v. Sekulow is an ongoing debate blog--a blogalogue--about how big (or little) a role faith and religion should play in American politics and government, featuring the two leading voices of the church/state battle: American Center for Law & Justice Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow and Americans United for Separation of Church and State Executive Director Rev. Barry W. Lynn.

Please note that in discussing political issues, candidates’ positions and political party statements, the Rev. Barry Lynn and Jay Sekulow are offering analysis in their individual capacities as lawyers and commentators. They are not speaking on behalf of Americans United for Separation for Church and State or for the American Center for Law & Justice. Those organizations do not endorse or oppose candidates for public office. Nothing contained in this dialogue should be construed as the positions of the respective organizations.

About the Authors

Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a nonprofit educational organization that defends religious liberty by opposing government interference in religion
» Posts by Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Jay Sekulow
Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization focused on protecting religious freedom, American families, and human life.
» Posts by Jay Sekulow
More »

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.