Lynn v. Sekulow

No Need for Answers

Friday September 19, 2008

Categories: Election '08

Barry, you can stop waiting for answers. It looks like you are just trying to put the worst-possible spin on the Values Voters Summit to detract from the serious issues of importance to evangelicals that were considered there.

 

I have no idea whether the remarks you claim were made were actually made there, and I generally don't comment on hearsay within hearsay. You were not at the event either. I have no idea what was said and in what context the comments you are reporting on took place. I was not at the event; I have been preparing a Supreme Court case in which you filed a brief in support of . . . in support of neither side.

 

Not having been there and not having heard what was said in its proper context, I can't pretend to speak on behalf of the speakers, or the vendors for that matter. I do know that Family Research Council Action said the following regarding the "Obama Waffles" vendor you mentioned:

 

We strongly condemn the tone and content of materials that were exhibited by one of the vendors at this weekend's Values Voter Summit. The materials represent an attempt at parody that crosses the line into coarseness and bias.

 

The exhibitor contacted our reviewer just days before the Summit by email and described material that sounded like it was devoted to political flip-flops on policy issues. When the content of the materials was brought to the attention of FRC Action senior officials today, they were removed and the exhibit was dismantled by the vendor at our insistence. It is our responsibility to fully vet materials that are offered at any event we cosponsor, but we are deeply dismayed that this vendor violated the spirit, message and tone of our event in such an offensive manner. . . .

 

Having said that, you have known me for a long time and certainly you know that racist or mean-spirited remarks are not the kind of comments I would make or support.

 

The bottom line here is that people have a right to voice their concerns about over-taxation and the problems with our public school system and how the candidates' positions will impact those issues. People have a right to say that they would rather have more of their money going toward charitable causes or providing for their families than going to the federal government which, under an Obama administration, would direct more of that money to supporting abortion. People have the right to come together and say that religion has a place in the discussion of public issues and that candidates for public office should have upright moral values and integrity.

 

This election presents a stark contrast of worldviews and ideologies, and events such as the Saddleback Forum and the Values Voters Summit provide an important way for people of faith to express their views on the key issues of the day and to hear what the candidates have to say.

Advertisement
Comments
ds0490
September 19, 2008 8:18 PM

"Saddleback Forum and the Values Voters Summit provide an important way for people of faith to express their views on the key issues of the day and to hear what the candidates have to say."

Correction, Mr. Sekulow. That should be "people of conservative Christian faith." Certainly there were millions of people of other faiths who did not have an advocate or representative at that forum.

daniel rotter
September 19, 2008 11:30 PM

"Saddleback Forum and the Values Voters Summit provide an important way for people of faith to express their views on the key issues of the day and to hear what the candidates have to say."

Well, people of the Christian and Jewish faiths anyway. No other religious persuasion was represented by any of the speakers at those two forums.

Earl
September 21, 2008 6:45 PM

Sounds like you're just whining.

N. Lindzee Lindholm
September 2, 2009 11:31 PM

This is America and as Dr. Jay stated, people have a Constitutional right under the First Amendment to speak out about any issues they so choose. The right of free speech is currently being seriously threatened by the Obama Administration in repeated attempts to bring back the Fairness Doctrine since the left feels threatened by the free speech power of the right. What's more, even though attempts have been defeated, the left secretly tries to guise the doctrine by assigning the legislation new names and reintroducing it to try to trick people into believing it's different law. Surprise. We know what you're up to and are fighting tooth and nail to see that this blatant attack on 1st Amendment liberties never prevails.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Lynn v. Sekulow

About Lynn v. Sekulow

Lynn v. Sekulow is an ongoing debate blog--a blogalogue--about how big (or little) a role faith and religion should play in American politics and government, featuring the two leading voices of the church/state battle: American Center for Law & Justice Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow and Americans United for Separation of Church and State Executive Director Rev. Barry W. Lynn.

Please note that in discussing political issues, candidates’ positions and political party statements, the Rev. Barry Lynn and Jay Sekulow are offering analysis in their individual capacities as lawyers and commentators. They are not speaking on behalf of Americans United for Separation for Church and State or for the American Center for Law & Justice. Those organizations do not endorse or oppose candidates for public office. Nothing contained in this dialogue should be construed as the positions of the respective organizations.

About the Authors

Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a nonprofit educational organization that defends religious liberty by opposing government interference in religion
» Posts by Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Jay Sekulow
Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization focused on protecting religious freedom, American families, and human life.
» Posts by Jay Sekulow
More »

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.