Lynn v. Sekulow

UK Judge Recognizes Grave Threat Posed to Converts from Islam to Christianity

Wednesday October 1, 2008

We recently received word of a landmark victory for religious freedom in a case we're handling in the United Kingdom. We represent a Syrian married couple who are both former Muslims who became evangelical Christians. The husband was training to be a radical Muslim imam, but in 2003, he became a Christian and informed his family of his conversion. His family members told him that, if he did not return to Islam, they would "wash their shame," meaning that he would be put to death. He left Syria for the United Arab Emirates and hid from his family out of fear that he might be found and harmed.

 

The couple received threats after beginning to share their Christian faith with Muslims on the Internet, including receiving a video of a beheading. The husband learned that his father and other people upset over his conversion to Christianity were looking for him and that his father had obtained a Syrian court order to the police to locate him. Due to the risk of death they both faced, the couple traveled to the United Kingdom, with the support of their local church, and sought asylum. They have continued to share their Christian faith during their time in the U.K.

 

If they were to be deported to Syria, they would face a clear risk of death under Sharia law due to their conversion to Christianity. Many converts from Islam to Christianity face great risk to their well being, including death, for accepting Christ and sharing their faith because apostasy--changing one's religion from Islam to another faith--is a crime punishable by death under Sharia law. In addition, the United States Department of State has documented the Syrian government's long and uninterrupted history of engaging in gross human rights violations including arbitrary arrest, forced disappearance, incommunicado detention, torture, and death.

 

We worked in conjunction with our international affiliate in defending the couple. In what is believed to be the first decision of its kind, an immigration court of appeals in the U.K. granted the couple asylum and noted the particular danger that Muslims who become evangelical Christians and share their faith in Muslim countries face. The court considered testimony on the fact that Muslim converts who become evangelical Christians face particular harm in Syria:

 

[W]hilst the Syrian Government may allow those who are already Christians to practise their religion, albeit within harsh and restricted guidelines, the condition of the Muslim convert to Christianity is one of life and death. Muslim converts are immediately disowned by their families and subsequently subject to a death threat issued by the local mosque. . . . [N]ot only would Syrian Muslims who had converted to Christianity be murdered for forsaking Islam but their murderers would go unpunished. Evangelising in Syria is permitted under the Constitution [but] is found to have the effect of "disturbing the public order." The practise is highly discouraged and subjected to prosecution.

 

The court determined that the couple would be "at risk" of harm from their family and the authorities because they became evangelical Christians. The judge concluded: "In my judgment the evidence points in the direction of the Appellant's contention that were he to return to Syria he not only could not practise his religion but he would also be in fear of his life."

 

This case will serve as a powerful precedent to defend the lives and well-being of Muslim converts to Christianity around the world in future cases. At the same time, however, converts from Islam to other faiths continue to face grave danger. It has been reported that Iran's parliament has approved a law that would require the death penalty for anyone convicted of apostasy. According to the report, under current Iranian law, apostasy is punishable by death, but the final decision rests with a judge. The report also states: "The new law is being debated in the Majlis of Iran (that nation's parliament) and would mandate the death penalty for apostasy. . . . Only days before the vote, two Christian men were charged with apostasy and are still in custody. Iran is listed as a 'country of particular concern' by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, and is ranked third on Open Doors' 'World Watch List' for countries with the worst persecution of Christians."

 

Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that "[e]veryone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief . . . ."

 

However, Iran and other extremist Muslim countries have placed adherence to Sharia law above the recognition of universal human rights.

 

Barry, I'm sure you would agree that all governments--including Muslim governments--have a moral and legal obligation to respect the freedoms of speech and religion, including the right to change one's religion and share one's religious faith with others, right?

 

 

 

Comments
Jay Sekulow
October 1, 2008 5:04 PM

Actually we have had several cases at the European Court of Human Rights. We have invoked the Declaration and Charter regularly.

Boris
October 1, 2008 7:58 PM

As an atheist but also a regular listener to Jay's show, I almost always disagree with the stance ACLJ takes on issues. Not always though and this case is a prime example of the ACLJ doing something I'm completely supportive of. Another more important issue points up why I am a regular listener to this show. This is this defamation of religion act that is under some kind of consideration in the UN. I wouldn't know anything about this at all if Jay Sekulow hadn't mentioned this thing on the air. Again of course, I completely support anything ACLJ can do to rid our world of this horrible atrocity in the making. I'm flabbergasted that the mainstream media not to mention the rest of the Christian media doesn't even seem to be aware of this defamation of religion act. What's up with that may I ask?

Jay Sekulow
October 1, 2008 10:03 PM

Boris- We actually have a team in New York City tonight working on the Defamation of Religion issue. Last week our ECLJ Director testified before the UN on the issue. Go to eclj.org for more information. Thanks for listening to the radio broadcast.

Andrew G. Bostom
October 2, 2008 8:50 AM

Dear Mr. Sekulow,

Thanks for taking on this most important human rights issue of our era: the threat of orthodox Islamic Law--Shari'a--to the Western concept of freedom of conscience. But it is tragic that the individual most suited to take on this transcendant issue--Barack Obama has responded with silence---and worse, as I described at length in an essay published 9/111/08 http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/obama_911_and_freedom_of_consc.html

My conclusion compares Barack Obama's silence and shrill accusations to the words and deeds of my dear colleague and "apostate" (what an absurd term in the year 2008!) from Islam, the great scholar, Ibn Warraq:

Ibn Warraq's formal childhood experience of Islam mirrored Barack Obama's -- it was no more extensive. Yet despite copious evidence to the contrary, Barack Obama has gone to great lengths to deny even a nominal childhood Muslim upbringing. These repeated, often shrill and accusatory denials are accompanied by a disturbing, if predictable silence: not once has Senator Obama celebrated the remarkable freedom of conscience he had here in America to decide in his mid to late 20s that he would practice Christianity openly, and devotedly, absent any consideration of his childhood Muslim background.

Mr. Obama has thus far squandered the unparalleled opportunity to highlight and extol a profoundly important virtue of this flawed, but still great country of ours, personified by his life story: America's singular, unwavering support for true freedom of conscience.


Surely if Obama is to live up to his followers (and his own) pretensions of being a "transformative" figure, then he should be ready to elucidate, frankly, the utter lack of freedom of conscience in the Muslim world, relative to the US; why his own life trajectory demonstrates this difference; and how the fight against global jihadism is, at its core, about the protection of this most profoundly important Western ideal. Let us hope that Obama's involvement with the 7th annual commemoration of September 11, 2001 will give him pause to reflect upon these matters, and discuss them, becoming a true "agent of change." And should Senator Obama need any further inspiration, I suggest he have a long conversation with Ibn Warraq.

Sincerely,

Andrew G. Bostom, MD, MS
www.andrewbostom.org

Ron BAldus
October 7, 2008 2:26 AM

How do you know they will be safe in England? Their are radicals there too.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Lynn v. Sekulow

About Lynn v. Sekulow

Lynn v. Sekulow is an ongoing debate blog--a blogalogue--about how big (or little) a role faith and religion should play in American politics and government, featuring the two leading voices of the church/state battle: American Center for Law & Justice Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow and Americans United for Separation of Church and State Executive Director Rev. Barry W. Lynn.

Please note that in discussing political issues, candidates’ positions and political party statements, the Rev. Barry Lynn and Jay Sekulow are offering analysis in their individual capacities as lawyers and commentators. They are not speaking on behalf of Americans United for Separation for Church and State or for the American Center for Law & Justice. Those organizations do not endorse or oppose candidates for public office. Nothing contained in this dialogue should be construed as the positions of the respective organizations.

About the Authors

Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a nonprofit educational organization that defends religious liberty by opposing government interference in religion
» Posts by Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Jay Sekulow
Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization focused on protecting religious freedom, American families, and human life.
» Posts by Jay Sekulow
More »

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement