Well, Jay, the Supreme Court got it partially right yesterday by conceding the obvious: that when a city accepts any monument from a private party and puts it up as a permanent display in a park, that represents “government speech.” [...]
Advertisement
Well, Jay, the Supreme Court got it partially right yesterday by conceding the obvious: that when a city accepts any monument from a private party and puts it up as a permanent display in a park, that represents “government speech.” [...]
Barry, the Supreme Court today reached the proper conclusion in a case we argued in November. Without dissent, the Justices issued what I believe is a landmark decision clearing the way for governments to accept permanent monuments of its choosing [...]
So, the Supreme Court has accepted the case of Salazar v. Buono involving cross erected on public land. The first and foremost point which we must not lose sight of in this case is that this cross was a religious symbol [...]
OK, Barry, it took a while – more than a few posts – but I am pleased you finally articulated your opposition to bringing back the Fairness Doctrine. I only hope you can agree with me on this one. The [...]
|
Previous Posts
More to Come
posted 4:52:22pm Dec. 02, 2010 | read full post »
Thanks for the Memories
posted 12:24:43pm Nov. 21, 2010 | read full post »
President Obama: Does He Get It?
posted 11:46:49am Nov. 05, 2010 | read full post »
President Obama is the "Angel of Death"? Give me a break!
posted 4:34:02pm Nov. 01, 2010 | read full post »
Juan Williams' Firing: Political Correctness Over the Top
posted 1:18:22pm Oct. 22, 2010 | read full post » |