Lynn v. Sekulow

Sotomayer: Why Does the Right Assume Extremism

Sunday May 31, 2009

Jay, I'm certainly aware that some of the most "liberal" justices on the Supreme Court agree with your arguments in some cases.  I even agree with your arguments in a few cases.  My question to you earlier, though, was why,...
Advertisement
Comments
DSJulian
June 1, 2009 2:31 AM

Come on Barry, you already know why. They have to oppose everything Obama does and redefine it as extreme left-wing politics. That's because the Republic-Fascist GOP has moved so far to the right that their Moderates look like socialists compared to them. First they tried to portray Obama as a Black Liberation Theology extremist. Then they tried to portray him as a socialist. Now they are trying to portray him (through this nominee) as a racist. And every time they pull one of these obvious stunts, it backfires. If they keep this up, after the next elections there may not be any GOP (Republicans) left.

Cara Floyd
June 1, 2009 12:55 PM

We still have legislation in place which is killing our posterity. How can this be in The United States of America?
It is against The Constitution.

Rich
June 1, 2009 9:53 PM

DSJulian,

You are certainly right. This is all about winning one for the "team" regardless of whether it be right or wrong.

Cara Floyd,
I assume you are talking about our government quietly and behind the scenes doing everything it can to support and endorse religion. I agree with you; it is against our Constitution and it is killing people.

Guy Allen
June 2, 2009 12:00 PM

Because they think anyone who does not hate everything they hate is an extermist

Gwyddion9
June 2, 2009 10:58 PM

Why Does the Right Assume Extremism…because, imo, this is what they really are, Extremism. They want all things ruled by their religious interpretation and they alone are to govern, as this is seen as their “god given right”. To me, this group is as Un-American as you can get!

Your Name
June 3, 2009 2:55 PM

Why are they calling individuals who want to protect the rights of the unborn posterity as extremist? I only refered to myself as an extremist Republican, because quite frankly I have heard some Republicans become a bit unbalenced in the view of Embryonic Stem-Cell and the morning after pill. I still view this process as murdering our unborn posterity, which quite frankly is an extreme unequal right, in my view. So, I had to say something to set myself apart from the pack, so they would notice that I did not support the notion of Embryonic Stem-Cell as being ok in the voting booth. I do not feel that sticking up for individual freedom of posterity rights is a threat by any standards. It is standing up for the written document of The Constitution of The United States Of America. We the people, we are to give a defense to our posterity. Standing up for our unborn posterity is right. Cara Lea Floyd (Smith)

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Lynn v. Sekulow

About Lynn v. Sekulow

Lynn v. Sekulow is an ongoing debate blog--a blogalogue--about how big (or little) a role faith and religion should play in American politics and government, featuring the two leading voices of the church/state battle: American Center for Law & Justice Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow and Americans United for Separation of Church and State Executive Director Rev. Barry W. Lynn.

Please note that in discussing political issues, candidates’ positions and political party statements, the Rev. Barry Lynn and Jay Sekulow are offering analysis in their individual capacities as lawyers and commentators. They are not speaking on behalf of Americans United for Separation for Church and State or for the American Center for Law & Justice. Those organizations do not endorse or oppose candidates for public office. Nothing contained in this dialogue should be construed as the positions of the respective organizations.

About the Authors

Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a nonprofit educational organization that defends religious liberty by opposing government interference in religion
» Posts by Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Jay Sekulow
Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization focused on protecting religious freedom, American families, and human life.
» Posts by Jay Sekulow
More »

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.