|
Previous Posts
More to Come
Barry,
It's hard to believe that we've been debating these constitutional issues for more than two years now in this space. I have tremendous respect for you and wish you all the best in your new endeavors.
My friend, I'm sure we will continue to square off in other forums - on n
posted 4:52:22pm Dec. 02, 2010 |
read full post
»
Thanks for the Memories
Well Jay, the time has come for me to say goodbye. Note to people who are really happy about this: I'm not leaving the planet, just this blog.As I noted in a personal email, after much thought, I have decided to end my participation and contribution to Lynn v. Sekulow and will be doing some blogging
posted 12:24:43pm Nov. 21, 2010 |
read full post
»
President Obama: Does He Get It?
Barry,
I would not use that label to identify the President. I will say, however, that President Obama continues to embrace and promote pro-abortion policies that many Americans strongly disagree with.
Take the outcome of the election - an unmistakable repudiation of the Preside
posted 11:46:49am Nov. 05, 2010 |
read full post
»
President Obama is the "Angel of Death"? Give me a break!
Jay, I think you would agree with me that businesses have the right to hire and fire as they see fit. Fox News, per usual, has manufactured a controversy here, and that's all there is to it. But since you mentioned you believe Juan Williams' had the "right to express a thought," I'd like to at least
posted 4:34:02pm Nov. 01, 2010 |
read full post
»
Juan Williams' Firing: Political Correctness Over the Top
Barry, it's the ultimate in political correctness. Losing your job for being honest - for expressing a feeling - a thought. The problem is that in the case of former NPR journalist Juan Williams, an honest thought - expressing a feeling - about Muslims and 9-11 - cost him his job.
posted 1:18:22pm Oct. 22, 2010 |
read full post
»
|
posted June 23, 2009 at 3:24 pm
My assessment of this case is on the side of the cleanliness issue. Keep your space clean. Its reasonable. What is not reasonable, however is potentially making this a case for “let’s guess what the landlord’s motives were”. That is censorship of the worst kind in attempting to legislate thoughts and opinions.
posted December 7, 2009 at 4:49 pm
A federal fair housing laws violation occurred if the government favors non-religious speech over religious speech for communications on the doors of apartments.