I think it's great that so many Americans want to volunteer
for good causes, and I have no problem that many want to work with faith-based
groups. Americans can volunteer for and/or donate to the charity of their
choice; the government, however, cannot.
The First Amendment makes it clear that public funds should never go toward religious activities. Yet,
certain people want to keep pushing programs that will do just that. One of
those programs is happening right here in our backyard, and I would like to
know how anyone can even justify it.
The program I'm talking about is the "D.C. Opportunity
Scholarship Program," which thanks to a few select senators, may be reauthorized,
despite the fact that it is unconstitutional and completely unsuccessful.
Today, the Washington
Post ran an editorial called "Children First," one of possibly a dozen
op-eds the newspaper has written in support of D.C. school vouchers. The Post said, "The program has more
applicants than slots; rigorous study has shown significant improvements in
student reading, and parents are happy that their children are in schools that
are safer and of better quality."
I don't know where the Post
is getting these facts because they
are far from accurate. It's this type of propaganda that keeps alive this
program that takes federal taxpayer dollars, gives them to religious schools
that are free to discriminate in hiring, discriminate in admissions and
indoctrinate children in the tenets of one faith, while leaving the D.C. public
school system to suffer.
Besides, we know for certain that this voucher program
has not done what it set out to do. All three congressionally mandated
Department of Education studies of the D.C. voucher program have shown that the
program has had no effect on the academic achievement of the target students
and no effect on students overall in math. And students in the voucher program
actually have less access to key services
-- such as English as a Second Language program, learning support,
special needs programs and counselors -- than students in D.C.'s public schools. (See results of the three studies here, here and here.)
Even long-time advocates of vouchers see that voucher
programs are failures. An article in the April 2008 issue of Washington Monthly concluded that
"some stalwart advocates of vouchers have either repudiated the idea entirely
or considerably tempered their enthusiasm for it." The article cited former
Milwaukee (which had one of the first voucher programs in the country) superintendent
Howard Fuller, who admitted, "It hasn't worked like we thought it would in
theory."
No, it definitely has not.
So Jay, don't you agree it's time for people to face the facts of this failure, put this whole voucher
business to rest and finally grant quality public education to every child?
To subscribe to "Lynn v. Sekulow" click here.
Taylor Anne was what I was going to name my daughter, she would have been beautiful. Too bad they erased her.
Taylor Anne
Beating people down is based in fear.
Cara Floyd
Your Name
August 9, 2009 11:27 PM
Taylor Anne was what I was going to name my daughter, she would have been beautiful. Too bad they erased her.
Taylor Anne
Boris says: Who erased Taylor Anne exactly and why? What are you talking about? Who is Pippy? You remind me of Tony Perkins talking to his dead mother in "Psycho."
Well I suppose if you don't like to face the fact that there are so many problems in the world and people are always trying to hurt others in some way or fashion, you might want an escape either through a book, a movie, a fictional character, or some other form of escape instead of a bottle of boose or some other form of unhealthy behavior. Sometimes it is good to just vent some of your ideals and frustations, instead of taking it out in unhealthy ways, using a character to possibly put forth some of your ideas or views or maybe bring up subject matter for whatever reason that is. Like I wrote before, I am entertaining myself, possibly bringing parts of my personality or things I enjoyed in life as a kid , basically sharing parts of me. Not that everybody has to read or react to any of these blogs.
I always liked Pippy growing up as a kid. A very bright girl with a witty personality. Her striped socks and her red hair. It seemed that she entertained herseld because there weren't people around to love her. I found her humerous and unique. (basically funny)
Taylor Anne was a name I picked out for my daughter that I never had. As far as she being erased, well she is back now. They do erase children you know, Boris. One at a time with an abortion. Yes they are boys and girls. I had a boy instead named Nicholas. I had recently watched the O.J. Simpson trial and I saw myself in Nicole. Something about her, the way she looked, the abuse she receive the ferror in her voice. So Nicholas was pretty close to the name of Nicole. So I chose Nicholas.
Cara
Okay I get it. You're nuts. I thought so. Everybody does.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.