Lynn v. Sekulow

Cross Should Survive Challenge

Friday October 9, 2009

Barry, I believe the Supreme Court ultimately will conclude that the plaintiff did not have legal standing here - that this challenge was legally flawed from the very start.    Merely being 'offended' does not give the plaintiff a legal...
Advertisement
Comments
DSJulian
October 9, 2009 3:49 PM

Jay --
I'm sorry to say it, but you are probably right about the issue of legal standing. This court, way overbalanced with conservative Republican appointees, routinely ducks out from under the serious questions, just like they did with Newdow's challenge to requiring his child to recite the Pledge of Allegiance including the clearly unconstitutional phrase "under God".

What is significant here is not the presence of the cross. What is significant is that another similar display was refused at the same location clearly violating the Establishment clause. In order to circumvent the Constitution, ownership of the property was transferred to the VFW in hpes that it might slip by on a technicality.

You can't win this one Jay and you know it. If the court upholds standing and leaves the cross there, they do so by declaring the cross of Christ to be just another secular symbol representing death. Whereas, if you lose the crucifix, minus Jesus, will still indicate eternal life in Christ. So the best you can hope for is that the court will weasel out of this decison too...

James
October 9, 2009 4:37 PM

"Newdow's challenge to requiring his child to recite the Pledge of Allegiance"

No child is 'required' to recite the Pledge in this country. Just wanted to make that clear.

Arrow
October 9, 2009 5:31 PM

It has already been ruled that stigmatizing children in school by separating those of different religious belief is unconstitutional. Being told to sit silently and forego rightful participation in the POA will have the same result, eventually.

N. Lindzee Lindholm
October 9, 2009 9:39 PM

What Dr. Jay pointed out that was also the center of Justice Roberts is key: that, in fact, the memorial is not a GOVERNMENT memorial. Therefore, it is a PRIVATE memorial on what is now PRIVATE LAND. Thus, the argument that the cross violates the establishment clause is void.

I am really SHOCKED, actually, that Mr. Eliasberg BUTCHERED the text on the memorial, obviously INTENTIONAL. Is that even ethical...to blatantly skew the text to undergird one's position, a certain malefaction?

Just because one is "offended" isn't enough to grant standing because the bringer of suit is not personally injured.

Mordred08
October 10, 2009 9:47 AM

N. Lindzee Lindholm: "I am really SHOCKED, actually, that Mr. Eliasberg BUTCHERED the text on the memorial, obviously INTENTIONAL. Is that even ethical...to blatantly skew the text to undergird one's position, a certain malefaction?"

Because no one ever makes mistakes, of course.

Your Name
October 10, 2009 4:09 PM

Closing sentence:


And for the support of this Declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

---------------------------------------------
Interesting to note:
sacred honor
sacred-1. Dedicated to or set apart for the worship of a deity. 2. Worthy of religious veneration:sacred teachings. 3. Made or declared holy.

So there you have it, another one of our foundational documents professing sacred honor. Sacred or holy honor to be pledged to one another. Now, if people have a problem with dedicatint themselves to worshipping God, I don't know what to write here, other to say that we were founded with the principal in tact of sacred holyness pledged to one another. So I believe in keeping yourself holy(set apart for God). As our founding documents perscribe.

Cara Lea Floyd (Smith)

Your Name
October 10, 2009 4:21 PM

p.s. That was the last line of The Declaration Of Independence.

another interesting portion:

with a firm reliance on the protection of _divine Providence.

--------
********

Notice, divine.

Divine-Having the nature of or being a deity. There is no seperation there. So, I would care to stand up for the right of America to be America again. To go back to our sacred divine Providence. As we were founded with.

So I am done with hearing how God should not be in our government. It is.

Cara Lea Floyd (Smith)

Your Name
October 10, 2009 6:18 PM

God does not exist, so "it" isn't in our government--or anywhere else.

Mary-Lee
October 10, 2009 8:54 PM

Cara, both of your quotes come from the Declaration of Independence, not from the U.S. Constitution.

Even if the Declaration of Independence were considered part of the law of the land, which it is not, the deity that was referred to was not the deity worshipped by Christians today. Today's Christians have created their own version of a deity that is nothing like the one that existed in 1776.

Mary-Lee
October 10, 2009 8:55 PM

Cara, both of your quotes come from the Declaration of Independence, not from the U.S. Constitution.

Even if the Declaration of Independence were considered part of the law of the land, which it is not, the deity that was referred to was not the deity worshipped by Christians today. Today's Christians have created their own version of a deity that is nothing like the version that existed in 1776.

Mary-Lee
October 10, 2009 9:43 PM

Merely being 'offended' does not give the plaintiff a legal green light to go to court to challenge this memorial.

Mr. Sekulow, how can I possibly describe the feelings I have when I see a cross? "Offended" doesn't even begin to express those feelings.

Perhaps the best way of describing it would be to compare it to the "feelings" of some Christians when they look at a crescent and star. Because those who attacked this nation were of the Islamic faith, albeit a perverted form of Islam, many Christians recoil with an almost instinctive, visceral fear and loathing at the sight of the symbol of Islam. They feel personally affronted and attacked, and they wonder why that symbol, which to them represents everything evil in the world, should even be displayed in this country. They fear those who profess the Islamic belief and would probably feel better if these people be put in prison for treason. Allowing Islamic people to serve in the U.S. military is, they believe, the height of stupidity and naivete. And all this despite the fact that the symbols of Islam in the U.S. are very few and far between. It is perfectly possible for Christians, and everyone else, to go about their daily affairs and never once see the crescent and star.

Those exact feelings come to my mind when I see a cross... every time I see a cross. I don't need to tell you about the wars fought and the holocausts carried out, all in the name of Christianity and the cross. "Offended" doesn't even begin to express the revulsion and detestation that I feel. Unfortunately, "offended" happens to be the only word that expresses those feelings... without starting a fight or without offending those Christians who are, in fact, good people but are blind to the horror that has been perpetrated in the name of Christianity over the ages and is still being perpetrated today.

Our government has wisely chosen not to permit displays of the symbol of Christian faith, or of any religious faith. on public property... property that I, as a citizen of the U.S., happen to own. Speaking of ownership, when did I or anyone else get to vote on the transfer of that property in the Mojave Desert to a private individual or group?

I am told to ignore the symbol of Christianity if it offends me. Sorry, but I cannot ignore it. But I do recognize that others have rights that are the same as mine, and that in a diverse society I need to accept the fact that Christianity exists and that Christians have the right to display their symbols on their own churches and on their own property. I can drive to and from work on a route that does not go past a Christian church. I can avoid the stores for one month of the year... although I really shouldn't have to. But when you put up a permanent monument on my land, then I am going to object as strenuously as possible. When you sell even a acre of my land without asking my permission, then I am going to object to that sale. When you try to revere the memory of all the soldiers... Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu, Native American, Islamic, and atheist men and woman who gave their lives in defense of this country... with a Christian cross, then I will fight you to my dying breath.

How dare you!

Boris
October 11, 2009 11:58 AM

If Jesus had actually existed (he didn't) and been killed say thirty years ago we would be arguing over the display of electric chairs instead of crosses. Does that shed some light on this retarded argument?

David Tiffany
October 12, 2009 11:22 AM

We are battling “atheists” in the wrong arena. It has been the arena of their choosing: the arena of deception. And as we do battle there, they are systematically trying to take God out of America, and they are walking right into our schools and destroying out children. Enough is enough. Let’s do battle in the arena of our choosing: the arena of Truth.


In Psalm 14:1 it is written, “The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”

The Word of God says that the person says it, not that they believe it.

John 1:9 says, “The true light that gives light to every man was coming into the world.”

No person is without the revelation of God.

John 15:18 says, “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated Me first.”

It is impossible for someone to hate Christians without first hating Jesus. And it is impossible for someone to hate someone that they don’t believe exists.

PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

(Have you been in those mind twisting, frustrating debates and arguments with professed “atheists” trying to prove to them that God exists? God set me free from that. It’s not your responsibility to prove the existence of God. It’s God’s responsibility. And He’s already done it. He has proven His existence through Creation, Conscience, and Christ, the Word of God.

You no longer have to try to prove the existence of God, but only to inform professed “atheists” that they already know God is there, God knows that they know, and He’s holding them accountable.)

Romans 1:18-20

The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has make it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.

Creation proves the existence of God.

Romans 2:14-16

(Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law, since they show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts now accusing, now even defending them.) This will take place on the day when God will judge men’s secrets through Jesus Christ, as my gospel declares.

Your conscience proves the existence of God.

Romans 10:18

But I ask: Did they not hear? Of course they did:
“Their voice has gone out into all the earth,
their words to the ends of the world.”

Christ, the Word of God, proves the existence of God.


Since God gives witness of His existence to every person, no person can honestly say they do not believe there is a God.

So what is really going on?

Psalm 2:1-3

Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain?
The kings of the earth take their stand
and the rulers gather together
against the Lord
and against his Anointed One.
“Let us break their chains,” they say,
“and throw off their fetters.”

(Rebellion against God is what really is going on.)

What is God’s response to this rebellion?

Psalm 2:4-9

The One enthroned in heaven laughs; the Lord scoffs at them.
Then he rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying,
“I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill.”
I will proclaim the decree of the Lord:
He said to me, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father.
Ask of me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession. You will rule them with an iron scepter; you will dash them to pieces like pottery.”

(The One you are rebelling against will still be enthroned as King. God’s purposes will prevail regardless of any rebellion.)

God, in his grace, now gives you a choice.

Psalm 2:10-12

Therefore, you kings, be wise; be warned you rulers of the earth.
Serve the Lord with fear and rejoice with trembling.
Kiss the Son, lest he be angry and you be destroyed in your way,
For his wrath can flare up in a moment.
Blessed are all who take refuge in him.

(A person can either continue in rebellion and be destroyed, or they can take refuge in Christ and escape God’s wrath.)

So, here’s the deal:

They know God is there, and He knows they know. And He’s holding them accountable.

For whatever reason, they are in rebellion against Him. It’s okay to talk to Him about why, but it’s not okay to continue in their rebellion.

He’s giving them the opportunity to turn away from this rebellion and turn to Christ.

The decision is theirs. But they must make one—stay in their rebellion and face destruction, or repent and find refuge in Christ.

But we must not let them continue to wage their battle in deception. They can’t take God away from us, and they can no longer seek to destroy out children.

David Tiffany
October 12, 2009 11:29 AM

We are battling “atheists” in the wrong arena. It has been the arena of their choosing: the arena of deception. And as we do battle there, they are systematically trying to take God out of America, and they are walking right into our schools and destroying out children. Enough is enough. Let’s do battle in the arena of our choosing: the arena of Truth.


In Psalm 14:1 it is written, “The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”

The Word of God says that the person says it, not that they believe it.

John 1:9 says, “The true light that gives light to every man was coming into the world.”

No person is without the revelation of God.

John 15:18 says, “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated Me first.”

It is impossible for someone to hate Christians without first hating Jesus. And it is impossible for someone to hate someone that they don’t believe exists.

PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

(Have you been in those mind twisting, frustrating debates and arguments with professed “atheists” trying to prove to them that God exists? God set me free from that. It’s not your responsibility to prove the existence of God. It’s God’s responsibility. And He’s already done it. He has proven His existence through Creation, Conscience, and Christ, the Word of God.

You no longer have to try to prove the existence of God, but only to inform professed “atheists” that they already know God is there, God knows that they know, and He’s holding them accountable.)

Romans 1:18-20

The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has make it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.

Creation proves the existence of God.

Romans 2:14-16

(Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law, since they show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts now accusing, now even defending them.) This will take place on the day when God will judge men’s secrets through Jesus Christ, as my gospel declares.

Your conscience proves the existence of God.

Romans 10:18

But I ask: Did they not hear? Of course they did:
“Their voice has gone out into all the earth,
their words to the ends of the world.”

Christ, the Word of God, proves the existence of God.


Since God gives witness of His existence to every person, no person can honestly say they do not believe there is a God.

So what is really going on?

Psalm 2:1-3

Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain?
The kings of the earth take their stand
and the rulers gather together
against the Lord
and against his Anointed One.
“Let us break their chains,” they say,
“and throw off their fetters.”

(Rebellion against God is what really is going on.)

What is God’s response to this rebellion?

Psalm 2:4-9

The One enthroned in heaven laughs; the Lord scoffs at them.
Then he rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying,
“I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill.”
I will proclaim the decree of the Lord:
He said to me, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father.
Ask of me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession. You will rule them with an iron scepter; you will dash them to pieces like pottery.”

(The One you are rebelling against will still be enthroned as King. God’s purposes will prevail regardless of any rebellion.)

God, in his grace, now gives you a choice.

Psalm 2:10-12

Therefore, you kings, be wise; be warned you rulers of the earth.
Serve the Lord with fear and rejoice with trembling.
Kiss the Son, lest he be angry and you be destroyed in your way,
For his wrath can flare up in a moment.
Blessed are all who take refuge in him.

(A person can either continue in rebellion and be destroyed, or they can take refuge in Christ and escape God’s wrath.)

So, here’s the deal:

They know God is there, and He knows they know. And He’s holding them accountable.

For whatever reason, they are in rebellion against Him. It’s okay to talk to Him about why, but it’s not okay to continue in their rebellion.

He’s giving them the opportunity to turn away from this rebellion and turn to Christ.

The decision is theirs. But they must make one—stay in their rebellion and face destruction, or repent and find refuge in Christ.

But we must not let them continue to wage their battle in deception. They can’t take God away from us, and they can no longer seek to destroy out children.

ungw
October 12, 2009 2:10 PM

Once AGAIN, nobody is "systematically trying to take God out of America". Just trying to keep religion and government separate, as the Constitution strives to do.
There is no law, and shall be "no law", which keeps "God" out of our schools; and there should be no law putting Him there either. The government must allow for personal choice. That's the thing that gets me, your intolerance of other views. It always seems fine with agnostics to allow others their god beliefs, why can't Christians be as tolerant of others?

When you write "they are walking right into our schools and destroying out children", I can only assume you you think it is destructive to allow people to reach their own conclusion. Sing, dance, or pray to whatever you want; just don't use the government to help you promote your religious views. If you are allowed to do that, then so are we. Perhaps you would see no problem with our POA incorporating the phrase "under no gods whatsoever"? If you give government the power to impose religious belief, you also give it the power to forbid it. Not at all what our Founding Fathers sought to do.
You may find the Bible to be "the arena of Truth"; while others might find it to be a work of fiction. You are not allowed to dictate to others what is religiously "correct", and we really wish you'd just stop trying. It strikes us as being "holier than thou", like you think you know more than everyone who doesn't share you beliefs...you don't, and we know you don't!

Your Name
October 12, 2009 3:01 PM

No Kidding Mary-Lee, that is what I wrote.

I didn't write that it was from another document. Why would you try and correct something that I stated as being from
The Declaration Of Independence.

That is alittle stange, unless you were trying to take something away
from my writings. I did not write that quote came from another.

Thanks anyway Mary-Lee , correct your own blogs. Once again, your trying to bark up the wrong tree.

Cara Floyd

Your Name
October 12, 2009 3:37 PM
http://Comment

Re:UNGW In regards to keeping government seperate from religion. The Constitution ---------------- Amendment1 Congress shall make no law to respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise therof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government redress of grievances. C.F.

As a citizen we are given the right to life, liberty, and property.

Liberty would be the right of religion.

I do not see that we are to seperate ourselves from religion, in these pasages as your ealier post suggest. I do see however that you are able to practice your religion as a freedom of choice. It does not state however that we are to remove God out of our foundation documents of this country or our court systems as your ealier post suggest. If however the God of Christianity offends you , I don't know what to write here other to write, you are given a free will to choose for yourself as to what to believe. Seperation, I think not.

We are what we are a sovereign nation.

Not a godless, one.

If you try and take God out of things, you indeed get godless philosophies.

Thus contaminating the world with a view of no creator. I am not saying that every sentence you write or speak has to reference God, by any standards. I am saying that the God who created you want for you to know that you are love and appreciated.

C.F.

ungw
October 12, 2009 4:21 PM

Cara:
"I do not see that we are to seperate (sic) ourselves from religion".
AGAIN, you are not directed to separate yourself from your religion, only to not use government policy to promote it.

"I do not see that we are to seperate (sic)ourselves from religion, in these pasages (sic)as your ealier (sic) post suggest."
I'll take James Madison's word over yours, no offense.
My religious liberty is equal to yours, yet, if I am to participate our national pledge, you would force me to acknowledge that this nation is "under God"--something I do not believe. Why? If YOU want to add "God" into the POA, that's fine with me...but it mustn't be led by government office that way. It's coercive and wrong. I believe we are a godless nation because I don't believe in supernatural beings. Keep your god belief, but don't use government to force your beliefs on the rest of the nation.

Your Name
October 12, 2009 6:00 PM

Mary-Lee

So your against the cross, eh?

I am sorry you feel so mortified by the very sight of it on our land.

It was used for crusify. So if you don't believe that Jesus rose again, that is your belief.

Now for those who have given there lives, Christians have. There are Christians who have killed people. I am sorry for the earlier Christians who did this to people. It does not however take away the sovereign God of Christianity. The one who created you. He gave you will and I would hope you could study the Bible a bit more to see the truth. It does not however have to be your choice. That is the thing, it is your choice. And I am certainly not going to convince you that all Christians behave like Christians. I have indeed exsposed to horrible things through Christians. This however is not our Lord, for our Lord loves us.

For our country, well if you are talking about The Declaration Of Independence: It is just that The Declaration Of Independence.

C.F.

Your Name
October 12, 2009 6:11 PM

ungw: Well, I certainly was not saying you had to choose the God of Christianity, now was I?

All I am saying is the people who wrote those documents believed. As for me, well, you can see what I stand for. Saving children for one. That would not be using government policy and laws to make a person not to look like a person and kill them with tax dollars around the globe, now wouldn't it?

What religion would that be? To kill people for the reason of selfishness? For killing other people is indeed an act of selfishness. Embryonic Stem-Cell, for if you kill these people for other people, that would indeed be selfish?

I am certainly not taking God out of our government or telling you that you have to believe in the God of Christianity. I know better than to bring people down that path. For if you take people in the direction of godless, you indeed get godless people. No thanks, I have had enough godless people to last me a life time. For even the people who profess to have God have far been less than I have exspected. I am not saying all by any standards, so let us leave it at that. Shall we . UNDER GOD=AMERICA

America is not above God, thanks but no thanks.

Cara Floyd

Your Name
October 12, 2009 6:56 PM

"I have had enough godless people to last me a life time."

And I have had enough of God spouting people to last me. America= worship any god you wish, or no god at all if that is your belief, but don't try to use government to push your beliefs upon others.

Your Name
October 13, 2009 12:44 PM

The civility of the debate is laudable. Some comments suggest that all must accept a particular God. Clearly, the cross is a Christian symbol. Government should not enable it to be forced upon non-Christians. Language in First Amendment cases look for a "secular" purpose and show concern for the sensitivity of minority religions or people without religion. Our country is diverse--No one should be made to feel he/she is an outsider. If one is so convinced that his/her religion is the sole truth, he/she should at least tolerate, if not respect, others with different beliefs.

Your Name
October 13, 2009 1:09 PM
http://Joy

I never was pushing anything. Looks, like an agnostic or athiest. A person consumed with themselves. A person only out to get what they want.

That would be selfish.

Your Name
October 13, 2009 2:46 PM

The last comment, 1:09 pm, makes no discernable sense.

Your Name
October 14, 2009 4:00 PM

Of course not, that is because you rectify yourself above God. Clearly it makes sence otherwise it would have not penetrated your skin enough for you to want a to post a blog. 12:59

Choose your belief, clearly you even want to critisize those who even state that. Seems like there is a real problem upstairs in the nuthouse.

tom
October 14, 2009 4:03 PM

As it has already been pointed out the DoI is not the law of the land the constitution is. To all who keep bring up the declaration of independence as an affirmation of the beliefs of the founding fathers and therefore justification for leaving the cross in place, have you ever taken the time to consider the difference in the tone of these two documents? Assuming that the creator spoken of in the DOI was the Christian God which I do not believe it was at least not by the current reckoning of that god one has to ask them self why this same group of people (for the most part) when writing the constitution went out of their way to leave god and gods out of it. Could it be that unlike you they realized the potential for abuse by a majority group given the authority of the government? I find it quite illuminating that in spite of their belief in a deity (of their choice) the constitution says nothing of god(s) other then in the date.

Your Name
October 14, 2009 7:37 PM

I suppose if you find that having no God in something is illuminating for you , than I have to ask why is that?

Do you find your own intelligence somehow far superior to God or you don't find trying to make a reverence of God in a document as a wonderful thing?

I suppose your mind is superior to a God of the universe than?

If you have not studied it out or you want a nothing reverence to God as our headship , than you get a nothing headship as a society. What I writing is that, if you take out God as your authority than you indeed get people as your authority figure or belief systems in place by recognizing their ideas a superior to God's. Yes, I know if you haven't studied out scripture you might find the general god of carma or whatever to be appealling. The only problem with this theory is that no body was found(in reference to Jesus). Not only that, but the deciples of Jesus during that time period were horribly murdered for the sake of believing and dieing for what they had exsperienced. So , like I have written before. The Bible states that Noah's Ark is resting on Mt. Ararat and there are findings of such in the ice glaciers still resting. So that would be interesting to note if you were believing in the general God why you wouldn't want The Ten Commandments in place. For they are true to the Word of God meaning , they keep everything in check.

Now if you want the god of whatever to rule and rain in government without our Ten Commandments in place, you have what we have today. People murdering children with their choice under policy of saying it is their belief system that they can do this through protected doctor applications of an abortion and the like. Of couse we have those murdering morning after pills as well as Embryonic Stem-Cell, which is indeed the murder of an individual. So take Thou Shalt Not Kill out of our government and you indeed have that. People who kill with no rule of authority over them, as if they found some sort of loop hole in the system.

God Bless,

Hopefully this will be rectified into a country which takes the right of an individual to murder children under authority away.

AMEN

tom
October 15, 2009 2:01 PM

Typical reaction from a believer missed the point entirely. It is illuminating because the founding fathers were intelligent enough to realize that interjecting one set of beliefs does not serve the entire population and that a government with a particular theological view becomes exclusive. It was their intention (I believe) to form a government that was inclusive not one as you would have it. What you or I believe is immaterial where government is concerned.

Why is it that when someone disagrees with a believer it is instantly assumed that they are not knowledgeable in nor have studied the scriptures I have in fact studied the writings of many religions through out my life (I am 60) and have come to my own conclusions which happen not to agree with yours. Please stop attempting to marginalizes those who see things differently then you do.

Also statements such as “Yes, I know if you haven't studied out scripture you might find the general god of carma or whatever to be appealing.” and”Now if you want the god of whatever to rule and rain in government without our Ten Commandments in place, you have what we have today. People murdering children with their choice under policy of saying it is their belief system that they can do this through protected doctor applications of an abortion and the like.” only show that you don’t know anything about what others believe. Do you know or have you ever heard of the five precepts of Buddhism (you know Buddhism the karma thing you spoke of (and misspelled).
Ethical rules for laypeople
• Not killing
• Not stealing
• Not misusing sex
• Not lying
• Not becoming intoxicated
Have a familiar ring to it and 500 years earlier then the Ten Commandments! Believers in general and Christians in particular DO NOT have exclusive rights to morality. Such rules are necessary when people live in close proximity with or without god or gods.

Your Name
October 15, 2009 2:17 PM

Way to go Tom! I was going to try again, but decided it would be like masturbating with a cheese grater...painful, with no chance of a satisfying resolution.

tom
October 15, 2009 3:27 PM

By the way I meant to say 500 years before the christian era. Try what? You haven't a leg to stand on the point is that in spite of their beliefs the founding fathers did not include god in government. I ask you why do you think that is?

Your Name
October 15, 2009 3:27 PM

No, sorry your so inclined to believe that the God who created you does not exist. Way to go Tom, cheese grater, no thanks. Cheese graters or those so inclined to think so highly of themselves as to point out some stupid comment of misspelled anything are just that, full of themselves and cheese. I will leave the grating up to you my boys, seeing how you see God who was crusified and died and resurrected for you as being nothing at all but a pure story . Like I wrote before Tommy boy, have you checked out Mt. Ararat. There were artifacts found which show fresh water lakes (meaning fossils from fresh water) before the flood. As well as evidence of the flood having taken place. Now you can go grate some more cheese, because I find the god of whatever exasperating and meaningless. For I know it is a false religion.

Have a nice day my friends.

tom
October 15, 2009 4:18 PM

fresh water fossils on top of a mountain prove nothing one can also find salt water fossils on the top of mountains different what was once ocean floor is now mountain top. I pointed out the misspelling to highlight the fact that you are not knowledgeable in the things you mock. why do you keep evading the question why did the founding fathers not bring god into the constitution?

Your Name
October 15, 2009 5:20 PM

"...because I find the god of whatever exasperating and meaningless. For I know it is a false religion."

Me too. See what I mean Tom? You can't get answers from the uneducated any more than you can get blood out of a turnip. You're trying to phlebotomize a turnip!

Trylon
October 15, 2009 11:31 PM

I’ll HUFF, and I’ll PUFF, and I’ll BLOW your cross DOWN.
A story by Trylon

Once upon a time there were three little Christian pigs who wanted a cross in the desert of Southern California. Desert is very boring. “There used to be one,” they said, “before godless government wolves began forcing their agenda down everyone’s throat”. “Let’s not take any crap from godless wolves ,” they all cried.

“I’m putting up a cross, right over there,” yelled the first LCP. Away he drove, and soon returned with arms full of white PVC pipe, six inches in diameter. After a flurry of measuring twice and cutting once, pieces of white pipe were assembled into the shape of a cross 8 feet tall. This light cross was attached to a concrete base and plumbed to please the Lord. “There!” said the first little Christian pig. “This is my memorial.”

But along came a godless goon of a wolf, who dashed to the PVC cross, took deep breaths, and huffed and puffed. The cross moved a bit off axis, so the wolf persisted, and finally the cross of the first little Christian pig was lying upon the ground in pieces. This hurt the feelings of the LCPs very much.

“Now you’ve made me angry,” said the second little Christian pig, who then disappeared for many hours. When the second LCP returned, he carefully moved some material from the back of a pickup truck. First he removed the debris from the old pipe cross and then began wild activity of doing something that looked like construction work, but no onlookers down by the highway could tell precisely what he was doing. It was a mystery. Finally, he came back to them.

“There’s my eight foot cross,” he announced proudly. “Where? I don’t see any cross.” “That’s the point entirely,” said the second LCP. What I did was to build a cross out of slabs of totally clear Plexiglas. God will know its there, but atheists and others will not. If they cannot see it, why would they complain? That would take utter gall.”

Having rested and eaten, the wolf came back to check on the little Christian pigs. They seemed a bit smug. Although the wolf did not see any offensive cross, it walked to the site of the old one. “THUMP”. “What the hell was that?” cried the scared wolf” and began extending its paws experimentally.

“AHA! There’s a big Christian cross here but it is made of transparent material. I, however, am totally offended by what I CAN PALPATE. If I can palpate a religious symbol on government land then the law of church and state separation is being violated. I must huff and puff until this cross, invisible though it may be to the naked eye, is destroyed.” And it did. The wolf destroyed the palpable cross made of Plexiglas. The second little Christian pig began to cry. The wolf plugged its ears.

“That does it,” said the third little Christian pig, who drove away in a leftover huff. He returned hours later with a truckload of red bricks, bags of cement, water, and towing a rotating mixer behind the truck. “Okay, I’ll need some help with this,” he told the pigs. He led them up hill to remove the debris of the Plexiglas cross. Then he knelt down and drew in the desert sand a picture of what they were going to construct. The three little Christian pigs began to laugh and soon they were singing “Onward Christian Soldiers” as they worked. As the others carried bricks up the hill the third LCP began mixing cement mortar. Soon they began to build a brick wall, 9 feet tall and 5 feet wide. They inserted thin pieces of sheet metal at vital locations and continued their masonry work for a few hours.

Finally they were done and walked back down the hill to look at their handiwork from the highway. Their brick wall was neat and sturdy on a cement foundation. They had, however, made some mistakes during construction. Between some of the bricks there were long gaps.

Suddenly the godless wolf showed up, and looked up the hill. “You’ve gone and made ANOTHER cross,” it screamed in outrage. “We have not,” the little Christian pigs replied. “But I can see the cross this time, right in the center of the wall.” “Beg to differ, Mr. Wolfe, but there is no cross on that hill. You can easily prove us wrong by going up there and huffing and puffing at the offensive cross.”

“I’ll do exactly that,” said the wolf who dashed to the wall and began huffing and puffing at the cross. But the air from its lung met no resistance, and, if anything, crosses ought to resist being blown at. The wolf turned to go back down the hill and saw four little pigs in stead of three. “Who are you?” the godless wolf demanded.

“I’m the attorney pig who represents these three little Christian pigs. My expertise is the U.S. Constitution. Nothing in our treasured Constitution prevents the building of brick walls with holes in them. It just so happens that the wall on that hill over there has a long, narrow vertical hole in it, plus a smaller horizontal hole closer to the top. But, these clients of mine did not create nor erect any Christian cross. I have a briefcase full of papers ready to file a lawsuit against anybody who says that of them. Would you like to be the first, Mr. Huffing Puffing Wolf?
30 30 30

Your Name
October 17, 2009 3:37 AM

And the lawyer had no fear of the wolf. Not because of God, but because NOTHING can stomach such a lawyer.

nicholas
October 17, 2009 3:15 PM

"studied out"?

Your Name
October 17, 2009 4:57 PM

It's like cipherin', or lernin' yer gozintas!

Frank
October 21, 2009 12:27 AM

Boris,

IF Jesus existed? Do you know how many non-biblical texts confirm the historicity of Christ? You live in a dream world if you think the person of Jesus Christ never existed. That's anti-intellectual in the highest degree. But then, that doesn't surprise me; I've read your other posts before; you're obviously a tool!

Mr. Incredible
October 27, 2009 2:53 AM

The "secular purpose" trap

What happens if the one observing the Cross sees a purpose different from the one intended?

In other words -- I intend a little secular purpose. You come along and decide to see no secular purpose, and you, wanting 100% secular, sue cuz YOU say that there is no secular purpose.

So, how much "secular purpose" must there be in, say, putting up a cross? Must it be 100%? Does the Constitution require 100% secularity? If you say it does, why "Freedom of 'Religion'" as first mention in the Bill of Rights?

Atheists say they have no belief [though they do; they believe something]. Therefore, the First Amendment's "religion" clause doesn't apply to them.

Mr. Incredible
October 27, 2009 3:00 AM

Frank
October 21, 2009 12:27 AM
Boris,

IF Jesus existed? Do you know how many non-biblical texts confirm the historicity of Christ? You live in a dream world if you think the person of Jesus Christ never existed. That's anti-intellectual in the highest degree. But then, that doesn't surprise me; I've read your other posts before; you're obviously a tool!
-----------------------------------------------------------
Frank, you gotta understand that there are two Borises -- the regular Boris we never see here, and Bizarro Boris, the contrary one you see here all the time who is always on the wrong side all the time, too.

Steven Crisafulli
November 12, 2009 5:30 PM

I am an average American who wonders how The Establishment Clause could be over turned. From what I have read, none of the cases that were used to establish this clause resulted in a state run religion. The Supreme Court has yet to make judgement on anyone act that has resulted in a state run religion, but is "prohibiting the free exercese thereof..." various religions because an act has occured. One act of religion doesn't establish a completed religion. Is there a method to over turning the Supreme Court's Establishment Clause. It's estamated that 86% of Americans believe in Jesus Christ. But the government continues to limit the majority of Americnans by limiting the free exercise of religion. Is there a way to bring a vote to the people over turning The Establishment Clause.

Gonzo
November 13, 2009 5:04 PM

Frank...please show me the contemporay evidence that an individual known as Jesus the Christ existed. Josephus is often trotted out, but he lived a couple centuries after the supposed death of the alleged Jesus and references the Gospels as a source. Any "fact" that uses itself as a reference fails.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Lynn v. Sekulow

About Lynn v. Sekulow

Lynn v. Sekulow is an ongoing debate blog--a blogalogue--about how big (or little) a role faith and religion should play in American politics and government, featuring the two leading voices of the church/state battle: American Center for Law & Justice Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow and Americans United for Separation of Church and State Executive Director Rev. Barry W. Lynn.

Please note that in discussing political issues, candidates’ positions and political party statements, the Rev. Barry Lynn and Jay Sekulow are offering analysis in their individual capacities as lawyers and commentators. They are not speaking on behalf of Americans United for Separation for Church and State or for the American Center for Law & Justice. Those organizations do not endorse or oppose candidates for public office. Nothing contained in this dialogue should be construed as the positions of the respective organizations.

About the Authors

Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a nonprofit educational organization that defends religious liberty by opposing government interference in religion
» Posts by Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Jay Sekulow
Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization focused on protecting religious freedom, American families, and human life.
» Posts by Jay Sekulow
More »

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.