Lynn v. Sekulow

Abortion Funding ...to be continued - Up Next: A God-free Capitol Visitor Center?

Friday November 20, 2009

The run-up to debate in the Senate on health care and abortion is already producing some interesting comments.  The Senate bill offered by Senate Majority Leader Reid does not include any pro-life language like that of the Stupak-Pitts Amendment which was approved by the House.  In fact, the Reid bill mandates federally subsidized abortion and actually requires a monthly abortion fee.

 

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) says he will offer a pro-life amendment to the Senate bill with language very similar to the House-passed Stupak-Pitts Amendment.  And, Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich), who's led the charge to remove abortion funding from health care, says he has the votes necessary to block passage if the Senate version does not include pro-life language.

 

The full court press is on to discredit the pro-life language in the House-passed bill.  Some in the legal community are questioning the constitutionality of the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, and one of our senior attorneys has produced a sound rebuttal to those flawed arguments.

There's a lot of debate ahead in the Senate, but at the end of the day we're hopeful that the Senate will do what a clear majority of the American people want - more than 60% according to the latest CNN poll -- prohibit federal funding of abortions in health care.  And, yes - millions of Americans - including Catholics - will once again be active expressing their concerns.  

 

Now, Barry, on to another topic I know you enjoy debating - whether the national motto and Pledge of Allegiance - on display in the Capitol Visitor Center in Washington, D.C. - violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

 

That's exactly what the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) claims.  In its ongoing quest to purge all things religious from society, the FFRF has filed a federal lawsuit challenging engravings which include the words "In God We Trust" and "one nation under God" at the recently-completed Capitol Visitor Center.

 

We've just filed an amicus brief with a federal district court in Wisconsin on behalf of 50 members of Congress - including Rep. Randy Forbes (R-VA) who chairs the Congressional Prayer Caucus. 

 

Once again, the FFRF is trying to create a constitutional crisis that simply doesn't exist. This lawsuit borders on the frivolous - a waste of judicial resources at a time when those resources are needed in cases involving real threats to American liberties.

 

It's also clear that both the national motto and Pledge accurately reflect the historical fact that our nation was founded on a belief in God and that the constitutionality of both is well established in case law. These expressions echo the sentiments found in the Declaration of Independence and recognize the undeniable truth that our freedoms come from God. 

 

As is the case with many of these troubling lawsuits, there's a lot riding on the outcome.  As we point out in our brief, if this suit is successful "it will undoubtedly embolden further challenges to other religious expressions in government venues, including the several religious works of art and various religious inscriptions in the Capitol Complex, as well as the prayer rooms in House and Senate Office buildings."

 

Our brief contends that the First Amendment does not compel the redaction of all references to God just to suit atheistic preferences.  "While the First Amendment affords atheists complete freedom to disbelieve, it does not compel the federal judiciary to redact religious references in every area of public life in order to suit atheistic sensibilities," the brief asserts.

 

This challenge is another misguided attempt to alter history and purge America of religious references.  We're hopeful it will meet the same fate as other flawed challenges and be rejected by the court.

 

To subscribe to "Lynn v. Sekulow" click here.   

 

Advertisement
Comments
Mr. Incredible
January 2, 2010 11:15 AM

Personality-impaired Boris:
... you claim not to believe in evolution!

Mr. Incredible:
Where is that claim and in what exact words?

We note that you are suffering from The Seinfeld Reflex: You gotta say something even if it's nothing.

Mr. Incredible
January 2, 2010 11:43 AM

The Boris Buffoonery Machine continues to insult Jefferson:
We're NOT created Incredible.

Mr. Incredible:
So, you disagree with Jefferson. We understand that.

The Boris Buffoonery Machine continues to insult Jefferson:
We are products of evolution.

Mr. Incredible:
You came from the apes. We can tell that already.

The Boris Buffoonery Machine continues to insult Jefferson:
You are one of its many failures...

Mr. Incredible:
Romans 8:1 [KJV]

The Boris Buffoonery Machine continues to insult Jefferson:
... but absolute proof of it's [sic] validity.

Mr. Incredible:
So, you STILL don't know the difference between the possessive pronoun and the contraction. ROFL!

The Boris Buffoonery Machine continues to insult Jefferson:
Why is it the least evolved among us are the only ones who doubt evolution?

Mr. Incredible:
It is now no wonder to me why those who choose to claim that they are homosexual look "up" to the animal kingdom for sex tips.

The Boris Buffoonery Machine continues to insult Jefferson:
Because they know if it was a little more efficient they wouldn't exist at all!

Mr. Incredible:
How's life in the flask lane?

Mr. Incredible
January 2, 2010 12:10 PM

The Boris Bubble Machine says:
We are products of evolution...Why is it the least evolved among us are the only ones who doubt evolution?

Mr. Incredible says:
You're a product of unintelligent design. You lost the genetic lottery.

Mr. Incredible
January 2, 2010 2:18 PM

Blubbering Boris says:
... the crux of the LEGAL question becomes, "Who has the right to control the body...

Mista Incredible be aksin':
Which body? The woman's, or the unborn child's?

Blubbering Boris says:
...: the zygote/embryo/fetus or the woman?" The answer is the woman

Mista Incredible aks:
The bloodstream of the unborn belongs to whom? Whose blood is that goin' through the unborn child?

Mr. Incredible
January 2, 2010 2:35 PM

Intellectually-impaired Boris mumbles:
... you claim not to believe in evolution!

Mr. Incredible says:
Incapacitated Boris says, essentially, that we all got started as a creature that slithered out of a swamp. That creature never thought it would turn into the likes of Boris. Had it any idea, it would have turned right around and gone back in.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Lynn v. Sekulow

About Lynn v. Sekulow

Lynn v. Sekulow is an ongoing debate blog--a blogalogue--about how big (or little) a role faith and religion should play in American politics and government, featuring the two leading voices of the church/state battle: American Center for Law & Justice Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow and Americans United for Separation of Church and State Executive Director Rev. Barry W. Lynn.

Please note that in discussing political issues, candidates’ positions and political party statements, the Rev. Barry Lynn and Jay Sekulow are offering analysis in their individual capacities as lawyers and commentators. They are not speaking on behalf of Americans United for Separation for Church and State or for the American Center for Law & Justice. Those organizations do not endorse or oppose candidates for public office. Nothing contained in this dialogue should be construed as the positions of the respective organizations.

About the Authors

Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a nonprofit educational organization that defends religious liberty by opposing government interference in religion
» Posts by Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Jay Sekulow
Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization focused on protecting religious freedom, American families, and human life.
» Posts by Jay Sekulow
More »

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.