Lynn v. Sekulow

Why Push Catholic Moral Theology?

Wednesday November 11, 2009

Categories: Abortion, Health Care

Jay,

 

I'd like to turn our focus away from Planned Parenthood and on to the Catholic Bishops.

 

As I'm sure you know, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops persuaded Congress nearly single-handedly this weekend to add an amendment to the House health care bill that essentially bars insurance companies participating in government sponsored "insurance exchanges" from covering abortions. That's right, they've succeeded in their push to interject their religious doctrine into America's health care legislation.

 

I will be working with many others to try to get this language is stripped from the bill before it makes it to the President's desk. It would be appalling if this fairly modest reform of health care has come at the expense of women's reproductive rights. Last I checked, Roe v. Wade is still the law of the land, which means this bill is cutting off access to a legal health procedure in most of the nation's insurance plans.

But for a moment, let's just put aside the abortion discussion and the horrific fact that the Catholic Church was willing to kill health care for the sick and poor if the Democrats didn't give them this amendment. What many people are now questioning is how one religious group can be such a lobbying powerhouse and not have to abide by any of the same standards and requirements as other tax-exempt organizations do when they operate on Capitol Hill.

As executive director of a tax-exempt group myself, I know our lobbyists have to meet certain strict requirements to be able to do their job. I also know that religious organizations, also tax-exempt groups, have no such requirements. It's a free-for-all for these groups, and they are using the benefit of their tax exemption to fund strong lobbying arms.

After all, no one elected the Catholic Bishops to Congress. They're not even representing the 68 percent of Catholics who say the church would be wrong to oppose the entire health-care reform plan merely because it includes coverage for abortion. In fact, a recent poll taken by Catholics for Choice shows that most Catholics support abortion coverage in health care reform, especially in cases of rape, incest and fetal abnormality. So how is it possible that the Catholic Bishops have determined what Americans as a whole want in health care reform?

I think it's time we reconsider these laws regulating the lobbying done by religious institutions. This recent development shows unparalleled arrogance on the part of church officials. Is there really any reason why they should not be subjected to the same rules and regulations as every other tax-exempt organization on the Hill? What do you think, Jay?

To subscribe to "Lynn v. Sekulow" click here.

Advertisement
Comments
Mr. Incredible
November 12, 2009 3:32 AM

Daniel Webb
November 11, 2009 6:59 PM
"As I'm sure you know, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops persuaded Congress nearly single-handedly this weekend to add an amendment to the House health care bill that essentially bars insurance companies participating in government sponsored "insurance exchanges" from covering abortions."

I'm pretty sure that's not true. They did not do it "single-handedly." Millions of concerned citizens like myself signed petitions. I know the ACLJ was involved in trying to get legislation like that through. It's not Catholics forcing their religious doctrine. It's America speaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------
PRAISE THE LORD! for your clarity!

Mr. Incredible
November 12, 2009 3:43 AM

Gwyddion9
November 11, 2009 9:05 PM
... I do not think that a religious tradition should have sway or power in the laws of our country.
-----------------------------------------------------------
It's not the power it wields, rather the power Lib leaders perceive coming down the road next November. Libs did not have to accept what the bishops said. They could've just gone their own, merry way, and taken their chances next November. Those chances don't look very good, anyway.

Gwyddion9
November 11, 2009 9:05 PM
If the adherents do not want to have an abortion, fine don’t have one...
-----------------------------------------------------------
However, it's not whether WE want one, or not, but whether the unborn person gets the same Due Process all persons get.

Gwyddion9
November 11, 2009 9:05 PM
... but it annoys me that religious groups think that the country should be governed by their religious beliefs...
-----------------------------------------------------------
That's more Lib propaganda.

Gwyddion9
November 11, 2009 9:05 PM
If abortion should become illegal, I, personally, would assist, in any way possible, to help a woman have an abortion should she choose to do so.
-----------------------------------------------------------
See? The woman would still have the Right to choose.

Gwyddion9
November 11, 2009 9:05 PM
Abortion was illegal before and many women died as a result of having to perform them either for themselves or have them done by less than reputable people.
-----------------------------------------------------------
What you mean to say is that they chose to perform their own abortions, or have less than reputable people perform them. They STILL had choice. Their choice, their responsibility, their guilt.

Gwyddion9
November 11, 2009 9:05 PM
The desire, by some, to create a theocracy in the U.S....
-----------------------------------------------------------
Nobody is trying to create a theocracy in the United States.

Gwyddion9
November 11, 2009 9:05 PM
One of the things I would like to see happen in this country is to have ALL tax exempt statuses of churches removed...
-----------------------------------------------------------
So, now, to YOUR way of thinking, there's an exception to the so-called "separation of Church and State."

Gwyddion9
November 11, 2009 9:05 PM
If a religion wants to play politics...
-----------------------------------------------------------
What's "play politics"?

Gwyddion9
November 11, 2009 9:05 PM
... then let them pay for it.
-----------------------------------------------------------
So, if one wants to "play politics," he should have to pay for it. How much are YOU paying for your Right to "play politics"?

hootie1fan
November 12, 2009 9:38 AM

Take away tax emepy status would show you just how unwilling some religious leaders are to pay taxes. They want it both ways: to skirt the law AND maintain their failities tax emept status.

Rich
November 12, 2009 6:51 PM

Gwuddion9,

I had to laugh at Mr. Incredible's imbecilic response to you:

Gwyddion9
November 11, 2009 9:05 PM
... but it annoys me that religious groups think that the country should be governed by their religious beliefs...
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Mr. Incredible's response)

That's more Lib propaganda.


Wow, this is standard for this guy. Instead of putting together some argument that disproves your assertion, he just throws out some overly broad generality. The trouble with that is that, while likely pleasing to the FOX News crowd, it just doesn't have any substance.

But, on the bright side, at least he didn't quote chapter and verse from his cult's one and only book.

BAC
November 12, 2009 9:38 PM

Progressives need to remind Senate and House members of two things: 1) The Catholic Bishops DO NOT speak for ALL Catholics, or all people of faith. And 2) The Catholic Bishops have no moral authority on matters related to sexuality. Until they clean up their house, they have no business in mine!

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Lynn v. Sekulow

About Lynn v. Sekulow

Lynn v. Sekulow is an ongoing debate blog--a blogalogue--about how big (or little) a role faith and religion should play in American politics and government, featuring the two leading voices of the church/state battle: American Center for Law & Justice Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow and Americans United for Separation of Church and State Executive Director Rev. Barry W. Lynn.

Please note that in discussing political issues, candidates’ positions and political party statements, the Rev. Barry Lynn and Jay Sekulow are offering analysis in their individual capacities as lawyers and commentators. They are not speaking on behalf of Americans United for Separation for Church and State or for the American Center for Law & Justice. Those organizations do not endorse or oppose candidates for public office. Nothing contained in this dialogue should be construed as the positions of the respective organizations.

About the Authors

Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a nonprofit educational organization that defends religious liberty by opposing government interference in religion
» Posts by Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Jay Sekulow
Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization focused on protecting religious freedom, American families, and human life.
» Posts by Jay Sekulow
More »

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.