Lynn v. Sekulow

Why Push Catholic Moral Theology?

Wednesday November 11, 2009

Categories: Abortion, Health Care

Jay,

 

I'd like to turn our focus away from Planned Parenthood and on to the Catholic Bishops.

 

As I'm sure you know, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops persuaded Congress nearly single-handedly this weekend to add an amendment to the House health care bill that essentially bars insurance companies participating in government sponsored "insurance exchanges" from covering abortions. That's right, they've succeeded in their push to interject their religious doctrine into America's health care legislation.

 

I will be working with many others to try to get this language is stripped from the bill before it makes it to the President's desk. It would be appalling if this fairly modest reform of health care has come at the expense of women's reproductive rights. Last I checked, Roe v. Wade is still the law of the land, which means this bill is cutting off access to a legal health procedure in most of the nation's insurance plans.

But for a moment, let's just put aside the abortion discussion and the horrific fact that the Catholic Church was willing to kill health care for the sick and poor if the Democrats didn't give them this amendment. What many people are now questioning is how one religious group can be such a lobbying powerhouse and not have to abide by any of the same standards and requirements as other tax-exempt organizations do when they operate on Capitol Hill.

As executive director of a tax-exempt group myself, I know our lobbyists have to meet certain strict requirements to be able to do their job. I also know that religious organizations, also tax-exempt groups, have no such requirements. It's a free-for-all for these groups, and they are using the benefit of their tax exemption to fund strong lobbying arms.

After all, no one elected the Catholic Bishops to Congress. They're not even representing the 68 percent of Catholics who say the church would be wrong to oppose the entire health-care reform plan merely because it includes coverage for abortion. In fact, a recent poll taken by Catholics for Choice shows that most Catholics support abortion coverage in health care reform, especially in cases of rape, incest and fetal abnormality. So how is it possible that the Catholic Bishops have determined what Americans as a whole want in health care reform?

I think it's time we reconsider these laws regulating the lobbying done by religious institutions. This recent development shows unparalleled arrogance on the part of church officials. Is there really any reason why they should not be subjected to the same rules and regulations as every other tax-exempt organization on the Hill? What do you think, Jay?

To subscribe to "Lynn v. Sekulow" click here.

Advertisement
Comments
Cornelius
December 15, 2009 1:56 AM

Barry,
Would you be opposed to a universal single payer system which did not fund abortion except in case of rape, incest or threat to the life of the mother? I would support a universal single payer plan whether it did or did not ban abortion. seems to me that the Stupak ammendment is doing essential what a ban on government funding would do under a universal single payer system. To argue that Provider plans which are paid for solely by individuals are not also government subsidized by being on the exchange and having customers who are government subsidized is like saying the church is not being helped by the government in receiving funds to run a rehab program that meets in the midst of its religious symbols.

Iggymomgi
January 2, 2010 10:33 PM

Has the American people not read history? Abortion was started by a "RICH" woman who wanted to get rid of the "poor" population and Alolph Hitler got wind of it and used their mission to accomplish his. He even had a meeting with the "RICH" woman. Also, as in the time of Jesus, the Church heirachy was a bought and paid for institution and that is why they crucified Jesus....He was a threat to their way of life more than to religion. The Catholic Church is also a bought position heirachy which followed the Jerusalem heirachy because of Roman influence. So, our legislators are also in the group of "what's in it for me money-wise"? Americans, stand up for once in your life and learn to FIGHT fir your God-given Rights. Our Constitution also tells us we can take out our politicians if they do not do the will of the people, for that is their job...DO THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE...not their own. WE the people lead and not the politicians...What are Americans afraid of?

Reason
January 3, 2010 1:12 AM

I believe Reverend Lynn has stated, on several points, the issues of personal liberty at stake. I stand with him philosophically on many issues of personal and religious freedom, and I hereby pledge a meager (unless I win the lottery) donation in support of the voice of reason he presents.

Boris
January 3, 2010 1:42 AM

Has the American people not read history? Abortion was started by a "RICH" woman who wanted to get rid of the "poor" population and Alolph Hitler got wind of it and used their mission to accomplish his.

Boris says: These are the kind of insane lies we get from Christian fundamentalists. For your information abortions have been performed in every society that has been studied. As long as women have been having babied they have been having abortions. Abortions were not invented by a rich woman. Also Adolph Hitler was a devout Christian who rounded up 11 million people and had them murdered simply because they did not accept Jesus Christ as their savior. That's on your head buddy.

Your Name
February 7, 2010 2:25 PM

Moral theology has always been a sticky subject for the catholics in my honest opinion...

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Lynn v. Sekulow

About Lynn v. Sekulow

Lynn v. Sekulow is an ongoing debate blog--a blogalogue--about how big (or little) a role faith and religion should play in American politics and government, featuring the two leading voices of the church/state battle: American Center for Law & Justice Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow and Americans United for Separation of Church and State Executive Director Rev. Barry W. Lynn.

Please note that in discussing political issues, candidates’ positions and political party statements, the Rev. Barry Lynn and Jay Sekulow are offering analysis in their individual capacities as lawyers and commentators. They are not speaking on behalf of Americans United for Separation for Church and State or for the American Center for Law & Justice. Those organizations do not endorse or oppose candidates for public office. Nothing contained in this dialogue should be construed as the positions of the respective organizations.

About the Authors

Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a nonprofit educational organization that defends religious liberty by opposing government interference in religion
» Posts by Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Jay Sekulow
Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization focused on protecting religious freedom, American families, and human life.
» Posts by Jay Sekulow
More »

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.