Barry,
It was almost too much to watch. Not that it was compelling television - it wasn't. Just the sheer amount of time (nearly eight hours) devoted to what amounted to nothing more than a photo-op for President Obama and the Congressional Democrats to tout their health care plan.
There wasn't much bipartisanship exhibited here, but what did become apparent is that the real goal of the summit was to clear the way for the Democrats to go-it-alone and force their health care plan on the American people using 'reconciliation.'
That's really too bad. The fact is that 'reconciliation' should not be used to pass health care reform. It's a partisan, legislative maneuver and is usually reserved for minor budgetary issues - not massive policy reform. Sure, Republicans have used reconciliation in the past - but never to revamp one-fifth of our economy.
Filed Under: abortion,
Democrats,
Health Care Summit,
House Minority Leader John Boehner,
House Speaker Pelosi,
news,
politics,
President Obama,
reconciliation,
Rep. Bark Stupak,
Republicans,
Sen. Harry Reid
Barry,
Time to revisit health care reform and I am hopeful you will agree with me that this week's Presidential Health Care Summit is shaping up to be nothing more than a photo opportunity for President Obama and the Democrat-controlled Congress.
Sure, the President has invited a handful of Republicans to sit down to discuss health care reform.
But, Barry, I ask you what is there to discuss? President Obama has unveiled his own health care plan - in advance of the so-called 'summit.' The White House says 'we view this as the opening bid for the health meeting.' Does that mean President Obama and the Democrat-controlled Congress is willing to wipe the slate clean and start over? I doubt it.
Jay,
I'm not saying that faith-based social service groups do not do good work. Some do great work, and many do this work with private funding in order to maintain their religious independence. Other groups that want to receive taxpayer funding must respect that most Americans do not want that funding to be used to discriminate in hiring or to proselytize.
According to a
2008 Pew Research Center poll, 61 percent of Americans say groups that encourage religious conversion should not be eligible for public funding. An overwhelming 73 percent say organizations that hire only people who share their religious beliefs should not receive government grants.
This is why Americans United has
asked President Obama to take action to safeguard and protect civil rights under his faith-based initiative. It's what most Americans want. It's also what the Constitution demands.
Barry,
I'm surprised you are not applauding the first year record of President Obama's White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. The White House touts its first year accomplishments and says it has "brought people together across religious lines" and was successful in getting the federal government to partner with faith-based and other nonprofit organizations to "better serve all Americans." Isn't that what you want, Barry?
I find it interesting that even with President Obama at the helm, a recent poll indicates that most Americans - 69% - still support government-funding for faith-based initiatives started under the Bush Administration and say they favor allowing churches and other houses of worship, along with other organizations, to apply for government funding to provide social services such as job training or drug treatment counseling.
Filed Under: ACLU,
Americans United,
Bush Administration,
Constitution,
First Amendment,
Judge James DeWeese,
news,
Ohio Common Pleas Court,
politics,
President Obama,
Ten Commandments,
Ten Commandments Poster,
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit,
White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships
It's been one year since Obama announced his version of the faith-based office. Civil rights and civil liberties groups such as Americans United are still fighting
Bush-era battles over tax funding to religious groups that proselytize,
job discrimination on religious grounds in public programs and lack of
accountability.
Please check out a piece I wrote for the
Huffington Post about this and offer your thoughts and comments on the Huffington Post Web site.
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}...