Jay,
I think it's great that so many Americans want to volunteer
for good causes, and I have no problem that many want to work with faith-based
groups. Americans can volunteer for and/or donate to the charity of their
choice; the government, however, cannot.
The First Amendment makes it clear that public funds should never go toward religious activities. Yet,
certain people want to keep pushing programs that will do just that. One of
those programs is happening right here in our backyard, and I would like to
know how anyone can even justify it.
The program I'm talking about is the "D.C. Opportunity
Scholarship Program," which thanks to a few select senators, may be reauthorized,
despite the fact that it is unconstitutional and completely unsuccessful.
Just yesterday, the Senate trounced the effort to create a kind of "voucher scheme forever" for the District of Columbia. The vote was 58 opposed and 39 in favor. The issue will not ever go away, of course, because the facts apparently don't matter to a significant minority of people.
As I pointed out in my earlier post, voucher plans do not work. Some of the parents in the DC program actually don't like the program, many parents eligible for it don't even apply, and in general the students themselves have mixed reactions (but don't feel particularly safer in their new schools than they did in their old ones.) But, I digress with the facts.
Barry, what's wrong with giving parents a real choice about what school to send their children to? Parents are in a much better position than you or I to decide whether the public schools in their community are providing a solid education in a safe environment.
Your claim that conservatives are guilty of supporting socialism by arguing for voucher programs is absurd. A basic premise of our public school system is that taxpayers provide students with an education without regard to their family's income. It is no more "socialist" to allow parents to direct a portion of government support allocated for their children's education to a private school than it is to provide taxpayer-funded public schools in the first place. Remember, Barry, that it was so-called "progressives" who sought to require attendance at public schools in states such as Oregon in the 1920s before the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the right of parents to direct their children's education. Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925).
Filed Under: Cleveland,
financial aid programs,
news,
Patricia William,
Pierce v. Society of Sisters,
politics,
private school system,
public school system,
Sacred Heart School,
school vouchers,
voucher programs,
Washington Times,
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
Barry, there's another troubling development in the education world - this one is not about stimulus funds for higher education facilities - this centers on high school curriculum and focuses directly on what's being taught in many Christian high schools across the country. We just filed an amicus brief in Association of Christian Schools International v. Stearns, a case pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that will likely have a wide-ranging impact on Christian high schools nationwide.
Filed Under: Association of Christian Schools International v. Stearns,
Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights,
Christian High School,
Circuit,
Common Good Foundation,
curriculum,
education,
New Community Jewish High School,
news,
San Diego Jewish Academy,
Seventh-day Adventist Church State Council,
Shoah-Holocaust Studies,
stimulus funds,
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth,
University of California