Recently in Health Care Category

The run-up to debate in the Senate on health care and abortion is already producing some interesting comments.  The Senate bill offered by Senate Majority Leader Reid does not include any pro-life language like that of the Stupak-Pitts Amendment which was approved by the House.  In fact, the Reid bill mandates federally subsidized abortion and actually requires a monthly abortion fee.

 

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) says he will offer a pro-life amendment to the Senate bill with language very similar to the House-passed Stupak-Pitts Amendment.  And, Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich), who's led the charge to remove abortion funding from health care, says he has the votes necessary to block passage if the Senate version does not include pro-life language.

 

The full court press is on to discredit the pro-life language in the House-passed bill.  Some in the legal community are questioning the constitutionality of the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, and one of our senior attorneys has produced a sound rebuttal to those flawed arguments.

Jay,

You asked me:

"Would you have criticized the Catholic Church if it had OPPOSED the Stupak/Pitts Amendment and it failed to clear the House?"

Here's my answer:  Of course not.  I think everyone should support the Constitution. In this case, the Catholic bishops have stripped more than half of all Americans of their constitutional rights. If the bishops had upheld the rights of all Americans, I'd be applauding their actions.   

Instead, they decided to push their narrow religious viewpoint on the rest of us. That's why I spent yesterday morning on a panel of religious leaders who, like me, opposed the bishops' amendment. This press conference at the National Press Club brought together Catholic, Protestant and Jewish organizations to call on the U.S. Senate not to include the Stupak-Pitts amendment in the Senate version of the bill.

There's nothing wrong with the Catholic Church - or other churches - addressing the issue of abortion.  As you know, this country has a rich and welcomed history of turning to churches and houses of worship during the debate of the great moral issues of the day.  Let's not forget the calls to action - to end slavery - and the powerful voices raised during the civil rights movement. 

 

Consider the call to action from the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. at Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta in 1965.  These were his words: "Legislation, executive orders, or judicial decrees will have to control the external effects of bad internal attitudes. Therefore, if we are to realize the American dream, we must continue to work through legislation. So it is necessary for Congress to pass meaningful legislation."

 

That's exactly what the Catholic Church did with its strong support of the Stupak/Pitts Amendment, which prohibits federal funding of abortion in health care.  The Catholic Church should be congratulated, not criticized, for standing-up for the life of the unborn.  We heard from nearly 170,000 Americans - including many Catholics to be sure - who wanted a guarantee that the House health bill would prohibit the use of federal funds for abortions.

 

Barry, would you have criticized the Catholic Church if it had OPPOSED the Stupak/Pitts Amendment and it failed to clear the House?

Jay,

 

I'd like to turn our focus away from Planned Parenthood and on to the Catholic Bishops.

 

As I'm sure you know, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops persuaded Congress nearly single-handedly this weekend to add an amendment to the House health care bill that essentially bars insurance companies participating in government sponsored "insurance exchanges" from covering abortions. That's right, they've succeeded in their push to interject their religious doctrine into America's health care legislation.

 

I will be working with many others to try to get this language is stripped from the bill before it makes it to the President's desk. It would be appalling if this fairly modest reform of health care has come at the expense of women's reproductive rights. Last I checked, Roe v. Wade is still the law of the land, which means this bill is cutting off access to a legal health procedure in most of the nation's insurance plans.

Little did I know when I started writing about Halloween that new "research" by the Christian Broadcasting Network uncovered that witches were contaminating Halloween candy and allowing demons to be ingested by "Trick or Treaters."  But here it is.

Now moving on to Planned Parenthood.  I think it is morally outrageous that one of the most well-respected sources of information on sexuality and pregnancy prevention is given so little government funding, and that their clinics providing abortion services are not funded by the federal government at all.  Why Congressman Mike Pence wants to cut funding even more is beyond me. Does he want young people to remain ignorant of human sexuality, or would he prefer they learn about it by finding their father's stash of old Playboy magazines? We are either going to be honest with young people or we have nobody to blame but ourselves when things go wrong.

Obviously, I am not privy to the details of your lawsuit regarding one or more Planned Parenthood affiliates' alleged "over billing."  It seems that the state of California has already conceded that the rules were unclear and doubt that Planned Parenthood will ever owe anything.  In addition, the state was apparently investigating this even before your "whistleblower" suit.  We'll see where all this goes.

I have just one comment on the cross controversy at the Supreme Court.  In my view, the Court will probably end up not resolving the core issue of the legitimacy of the land tranfer and resolve this either on standing...

Sadly, I had to miss this year's edition of the Religious Right's "family values" festival -- the Values Voters Summit here in Washington.  I was engaging in my own celebration of family values by participating in my son's wedding out...

The bill  introduced to reform health care by Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) has splintered the Democrats and so far has no support among Republicans.  As reported earlier, Senators Grassley and Enzi, in fact, have expressed concerns about the abortion provisions. ...

Barry, even as another health care plan is being introduced into Congress, there's a continuing - and a very real - concern about the issue of abortion. Senators Michael Enzi of Wyoming and Charles Grassley of Iowa have expressed their...

On Thursday, I blogged defending the position that the current version of the health care reform bill moving through the House does not cover abortion. I've tried to respond to some of the posted responses already.I'd also like to point...

Barry, unfortunately President Obama squandered a prime-time audience and a Congressional address to do very little to move the ball forward regarding efforts to reform our health care system.    President Obama is losing support with the American people on...

It did not take long for the media and politicos to start speculating about what the death of Senator Kennedy will mean to the current debate on health care and other vital issues.   Just hours after his death, a...

I like to think that my outrage is in relative proportion to the outrage that generated it in the first place.  I have never been known to give any politician a "pass" nor to overstate the gravity of a politician's anti-separation errors....

Barry, I'm pleased to see that you brought up President Obama's use of religion during his conference call designed to drum up additional support among religious Americans for his health care plan.  I'm glad that you're concerned, but disappointed that...

Yesterday at 5 o'clock Eastern time, I joined the President and 130,000 of his closest friends on a conference call about health care.  Earlier in the day, the President had a similar phone call with about 1,000 rabbis, initiated by...

The White House flagging program was both less useful and less sinister than its advocates and opponents, respectively, believed.  One can understand the frustration that the White House has about the astonishing level of lies, misinformation and nonsense being promoted by the...

Barry, it looks like the White House got the message:  its email 'flagging' operation appears to have been disabled.   As I reported to you last week, the White House launched in early August what can only be described as...

Barry, there's a troubling pattern developing as the White House and Congressional leadership embark on a campaign to silence their critics - especially when it comes to concerns about health care.   Example One:  Last week, in an official White...

Barry, I know we won't agree on the abortion/health care issue - but it's worth noting that we have heard from more than 70,000 Americans (more than 60,000 online) who are demanding that Congress include an exclusion on abortion services to...

Barry, I disagree that "any sensible health care reform" is going to have to cover, as you call it "reproductive health care," or as I would say, "abortion."  Americans do not want their federal dollars paying for abortions.  Let me...

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;...

In an effort to revamp the nation's health care system, there's a troubling development underway in the legislative process  Congress is considering health care legislation that would identify abortion as a health 'benefit' and mandate coverage of abortion services in...