Beliefnet
Movie Mom

Sponsored by:  

Tuesday June 10, 2008

Category: DVDs , Science-Fiction , Thriller

The Happening

happening.jpgHere's a spooky story: a talented storyteller mesmerizes his audience and then loses his way in a thicket of self-regard so that no matter how hard he tries, each of the stories he tells becomes less powerful than the one before.

M. Night Shyamalan is one of the most talented film-makers working today. But he seems to be running out of ideas. He still knows how to use a camera brilliantly and he is still a master of images that are disturbing in an intriguing way. But so much of this movie seem greatest hits cut and pasted from his other, better films, as generic as the title (anyone else here humming the Supremes song?). There is a train as in "Unbreakable." There is a scene in a schoolroom as in "The Sixth Sense." A child is important to the story as in "The Sixth Sense" and "Signs." Like "Signs" there is a scary scene with characters trapped in a beautiful old house in a remote location.

"There appears to be an event happening." All at once, without warning, people in New York City's Central park become disoriented and then self-destructive. They begin to kill themselves. Bodies come hurtling from the girders of a construction project. A cop pulls out his gun and kills himself. Others grab the gun lying near his body to shoot themselves with the remaining bullets. Have terrorists released toxins into the air? Is it some kind of alien attack? No one knows.

In Philadelphia, high school science teacher Elliot Moore (Mark Wahlberg) is called out of class. The students are being sent home. He and his best friend Julian (John Leguizamo), a math teacher, decide it will be safer away from the city. Julian's wife is out of town but will meet up with them. Elliot's slightly estranged wife Alma (Zooey Deschanel) comes along but insists on sitting alone. Then, in the middle of nowhere, the train stops. "We've lost contact," the conductor tells them. "With whom?" "Everyone."

Julian goes in search of his wife, leaving his shy daughter with Elliot. And so Elliot, Alma, and the little girl go on the run, not knowing anything about what it is they are running from or where they are running to.

Many of the individual scenes deliver. Shyamalan knows how to create an eerie mood and when to pepper the story with release, whether a gasp or a laugh. But there is some unintentional humor as Elliot and Alma pause to resolve their marital conflicts, natter about a mood ring, and Elliot tries to make conversation with a potted plastic plant. The talented Wahlberg and Deschanel do their best but cannot make much of an impression with cardboard characters and clunky exposition. Wahlberg manages some warmth now and then but Deschanel has little do to but open her eyes wide. Those blue eyes seem to be Shyamalan's favorite special effect. The exposition is intrusively inserted and clumsily handled. And in the last half hour, just as things should be ramping up, all of the air rushes out like a stuck balloon. Shyamalan does not always have to deliver a twist, but he does have to deliver an ending better than this one.

Parents should know that this movie has a good deal of violence, some graphic, multiple suicides, shooting death of teenagers, mauling by an animal, some grisly images of wounds and dead bodies, disturbing themes including the deaths of hundreds of people, and brief strong language. There is a sexual joke and there are some mild references to infidelity.

Family discussion: Julian has to make a very difficult choice between protecting his wife and protecting his daughter. What were the reasons for the decision he made and do you agree? What other choices made by the people in this movie seemed right or wrong to you?

If you like this, try: Alfred Hitchcock's "The Birds," the classic thriller "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" (the original and first remake) and M. Night Shyamalan movies "The Sixth Sense" and "Signs"

Filed Under: m. night shyamalan, mark wahlberg, the happening

Post a Comment

Comments

You are right, B. Totally right. This guy has been a dud for three movies in a row.

B, to say that I "have no business reviewing movies" is to say that you confuse insults with arguments. That is a shame, as I would really like to know what you think and why we disagree. You, too, B+1 -- and "a dud for three movies in a row" does not mean he is not talented; your own assertion admits that he has made good films. Have either of you seen the film? I can't tell from what you wrote, and I do not believe people should comment on films they have not seen.

It is not the job of a critic to write something you agree with. It is the job of the critic to explain his or her own opinions in a way that is enlightening and interesting to read in a way that can help readers decide whether a movie is right for them or perhaps help them think about a movie in a new way.

And do we disagree that much? Read the review again, particularly the first paragraph. I am very critical of Shyamalan. But he is an enormously talented film-maker who really knows how to use the camera to tell a story and how to compose strikingly unforgettable images. He has great strengths and great faults, both worth discussing, so if you care to weigh in with ideas and arguments, we'd all be glad to hear them.

Thank you Nell for you reply to B+1. I look for critic reviews so that I know what to look for to see if it is right for me or my child to see. I understand that a critics review is that of his own. Most people don't realize this because we all have our own opinions. I do think Shyamalan is a great writer and director (even his dud movies are tolerable) because he does not feel like he needs "the gore" in order to make a good movie. Thank you for being so direct. It is very refreshing.

thank you this review of the movie was helpful im going to see it tonight with my girlfriend. Hope it's good ! i love any movie with wahlberg =]

the worst movie I've ever seen. Not just bad. It's empty. No one redeeming quality. I generally like movies . . . even those that aren't that good. However, I've never seen anything so useless. My wife and I started to walk out during the first 10 minutes and continued to convenice ourselves to stick it out, it would have to get better. Alas, nothing. And the story had such potential. No drama, no excitement, no passion, no twist, no emotion, nothing. In a word, empty.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?


(won't be made public)

Advertisement

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Enter your email to receive a daily digest of new posts in your inbox:

Categories

All Current Releases DVDs Shorts Add category
Features & Top 10s Festivals Internet and Gaming Lists Media Appearances Music Q&As Television

About Movie Mom

Movie Mom's Archives
Movie Mom's full archives of more than 1,400 reviews (including her 200 best films for families) and 400 blog posts will be moving onto Beliefnet during the coming weeks. Check back regularly as more archived content is added.

About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

DiggDeliciousNewsvineRedditStumbleTechnoratiFacebook