| Audience: | All Ages |
| MPAA Rating: | G |
| Profanity: | None |
| Nudity/Sex: | Kiss |
| Alcohol/Drugs: | None |
| Violence/Scariness: | Tension and peril, themes of environmental degredation and toxic waste |
| Diversity Issues: | None |
| Movie Release Date: | June 27, 2008 |
700 years after the last humans left the planet they had made uninhabitable through environmental degradation, one small robot is still continuing to crunch the mountains of trash. He is a Waste Allocation Load-Lifter Earth-Class, or Wall∙E. His eyes are binoculars, his legs are treads, and his torso is a garbage compacter. But somehow, somewhere, he has developed the heart of a true romantic hero. His speech may be made up of beeps and squeaks but he thinks about the trash he picks up, puzzling (as well he might) over a spork and a Rubik's Cube. He feels affection for the only life form he sees, a friendly brown cockroach. And every night he comes back to his little home and puts on an old video tape of "Hello Dolly," watching the big dance numbers and dreaming robotic dreams of having a hand to hold, just like the characters in the movie. Just as we always suspected, after total annihilation of everything else on the planet, the only survivors will be cockroaches, Broadway show tunes, and Twinkies (okay, the lawyers made them call it something else on the package, but trust me, it's a Twinkie).
The genius of Pixar, the most successful movie studio in history, the only one ever to make more than $100 million with every one of its releases, is that they may spend blockbuster money on a film (reportedly $180 million for this one) but hold on to the soul of an independent movie made on a microscopic budget. They are happy to take on the consumerist culture that has made their corporate owner, Disney, a world power larger and more influential than most countries. They don't rely on pre-sold characters (fairy tales, television shows) or focus-grouped storylines with all of the risk and quirkiness squeezed out of them -- along with all of the authenticity and character. Like the humble little hero of this film, they hold onto their dreams. If that makes the films more challenging, less easily accessible, good for them and good for us, too.
Indeed, that is one of the themes of this film, whose robot characters have much more wisdom, courage, intelligence, and personality than the humans. After 700 years away from Earth, humans have devolved into a sort of perpetual infancy, their minds and bodies all but atrophied. They float through their space station in hover chairs, mesmerized by media screens before their eyes that block their ability to see anything else. Food and drink are constantly brought to them by robot drones and they, like their space station, are on automatic pilot. One of the lovely ironies of this story is that the machine who watches "Hello Dolly" on a broken-down videotape is inspired by it to seek companionship and intimacy while the humans' media immersion puts them in a constant state of dazed isolation.
Wall∙E's life is changed when an egg-shaped space probe named Extra-terrestrial Vegetation Evaluator (EVE) arrives. At first, they seem like opposites. He is scuffed and rusty and she is sleek and pristine. He is a romantic and she is all business. But like all great screen romances, their initial disconnections spark their affection. In this case literally. Their kiss is electrifying.
Wall∙E and EVE end up on EVE's space station where her mission is revealed -- and then imperiled. It is the misfit robots and one brave human who discovers that he can think for himself who must find a way to bring the humans and their home planet back to life. Just as the first courageous little tendril of a plant is willing to give Earth another chance, so the first tender stirrings of empathy, affection, curiosity, and honor in the small robots and the oversize humans inspire each other -- and us.
Pixar is also famous for the short films that precede its features and this one is a gem. Be sure to get there on time for the hilarious story of a magician with a hungry bunny.
Parents should know that this movie has some tense scenes of characters in peril and that its themes of environmental degradation and human negligence may be disturbing. Some younger audience members may find it difficult to follow the extended scenes without any dialogue.
Family discussion: What can we do now to prevent the kind of environmental degradation and human negligence shown in this movie? How do we know when to disobey orders or "directives?"
If you like this, try: the other Pixar films, a classic science fiction film with similar themes and equally adorable robots, Silent Running (some mature material), and of course Hello, Dolly!

Add to Newsvine
Josie, thank you so much for a beautifully expressed comment. I am thrilled that you loved the movie and so happy you liked my review. Please visit often and let me know what you think of the movies you see.
Amy: I've always wondered why people see Hollywood's agenda as "Democratic" or "leftist". Are the movie studios not giant corporations with money as the sole motivating factor for anything they do? Do you really see Disney as a left-leaning business enterprise?
As for your argument about blue vs. red, remember that the only two passengers on the ship who remained wearing red were the "heroes" of the general populace. I won't say any more for fear of spoiling the film, but I think when you take your disdain for the left out of the equation, you'll see this movie was playing it entirely neutral.
The message is simple, and it is targeted at an American/Western audience. It presents our lifestyles as sedentary and destructive and projects their influence 800 years into the future. There should be no doubt in anyone's mind that things here need to change, and fast. Why does the film need to show what's happening in China when we have yet to clean up our own backyard despite DECADES of warnings?
I cannot stand partisanism. To me, it's simply an excuse not to act.
Thanks so much, James, for a terrific comment. It frustrates me terribly when people insist on pigeonholing everything as either "us" or "them," especially when the "us" is so narrowly drawn. It also frustrates me that we seem to be stuck in some kind of culture mired somewhere between "ouch" and "gotcha," with every single statement relegated to the categories of insult or triumph. There is no surer way to miss the point of art -- and the point of life -- than to try to squeeze out all nuance and complexity, the very things that illuminate universal truths and layers of meaning.
This movie is not a political commercial (thank goodness). Sometimes, red and blue are just colors. In fact, they were colors a long time before they got arbitrarily assigned to election-night maps by the television networks, and they are not the property of the political process.
This is a movie that imagines a touching and provocative future for humanity if we continue on our current path. You are right, James, that "well they began it," or "they're doing it, too" are never going to solve our problems. And most of all, you are right that this movie transcends the tiny little labels that people who can only see a narrow sliver of the spectrum try to put on them.
I can't believe no one's mentioned the short film at the start, "Presto." I thought it was as hilarious as one of the classic Bugs Bunny/Yosemite Sam cartoons, and the best of the recent Pixar shorts, except maybe "Jack-Jack Attack."
I loved "WALL-E" as well, it was virtually flawless (except for the inconsistent usage of the fire extinguisher for propulsion), and I think it deserves to be nominated for Best Picture at the next Oscars, not just Best Animated Feature.
I did mention the short film in my review -- it was one of their best! Great comparison to the Warner Brothers animation classics and I loved your comment. Thanks very much and I hope you will return often!
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.