| Audience: | Middle School |
| MPAA Rating: | Rated PG for scary images, some violence, language and mild sensuality. |
| Profanity: | Mild language |
| Nudity/Sex: | Teen kissing (referred to as "snogging") |
| Alcohol/Drugs: | Drinking and an intoxicating potion, characters get tipsy |
| Violence/Scariness: | evel disturbing and grotesque images, peril, and violence including emaciated zombie-like creatures |
| Diversity Issues: | Diverse characters |
| Movie Release Date: | July 14, 2009 |
In his last two movies, Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) was becoming an adolescent. In this gripping and atmospheric film, based on the sixth book in the series, Harry Potter is becoming a man. He knows who he is and what he must do. He is angry and at times he is still impatient. He is developing confidence and judgment. But he is not yet ready to admit to himself, much less to Ron Weasley's sister Ginny (Bonnie Wright) that he likes her very much.
Once again, author J.K. Rowling and screenwriter Steve Kloves expertly blend the most intimate and personal of teenage feelings with the grander concerns about the fate of the world. Indeed the two themes do more than blend; they complement each other. The threats deepen and become more complex as the children grow up. The personal is political, and vice versa.
As the film begins, the disturbances in the wizard world have become so pervasive that even the muggle society is affected. In an early scene that highlights sleek, post-industrial London, we see a bridge collapse due to a form of terrorist attack by the Death Eaters, the followers of He Who Must Not Be Named. But then we are back to the Victorian intricacies of the wizard world of Diagon Alley and Hogwarts. Harry is reputed to be the "chosen one" who can defeat Lord Voldemort. But there is another chosen one. Draco Malfoy, his father disgraced and in prison, returns to Hogwarts having undertaken some task so dangerous that his mother and aunt have visited Professor Snape (Alan Rickman) to insist on his unbreakable vow to provide support and protection.
Director David Yates and "Amelie" cinematographer Bruno Delbonnel brilliantly evoke the magical world, narrow, constricting spaces emphasizing the dire circumstances and adult awareness closing in on the characters. The special effects are organic and absorbing. Oddly, just moments after a beautiful transformation from easy chair to wizard, the one effect that does not work as smoothly is the simplest, as the footage is run backwards to magically restore a room that has been trashed. But the more complex effects and the overall look of the film are superb.
There is a new teacher of Defense Against the Dark Arts, of course. This time it is Snape, his Potions class taken over by Professor Slughorn (Jim Broadbent), who shows a special fondness for "collecting" star students like Harry but whose memory holds a crucial key to Voldemort's strength -- and his vulnerability. An exposition-heavy entry in the book series that sets up the powerful final volume (being split in two for filming) is absorbing on screen due to its control of tone and atmosphere and some truly creepy moments involving Helena Bonham Carter, happily gruesome as Bellatrix Lestrange and a couple of marvelously-staged action sequences.
There are classroom scenes as Harry finds help in an old potions textbook with an inscription that says it belonged to the "Half-Blood Prince" and extensive annotations that help him become a top student. There is a Quidditch game and a battle in one of the huge Hogwarts bathrooms. But increasingly the activities of Harry and his loyal friends Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson).expand beyond the classrooms. Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) relies on Harry for help in exposing Voldemort, their relationship developing into more of a partnership. Dumbledore's most important lesson may be that Harry can do some things that even Dumbeldore cannot. This makes us, as well as Harry, all the more eager to see what comes next.
Parents should know that this film has PG-13-level disturbing and grotesque images, peril, and violence including emaciated zombie-like creatures, sad deaths, teen kissing, drinking, including tipsy characters.
Family discussion: Both Harry and Draco are called "chosen." What does that mean? How do Hermione and Harry help Ron in Quidditch in different ways and are they fair? Which characters are not afraid to say the name Voldemort, and why?
If you like this, try: the Harry Potter Books and Harry Potter movies
and Time Bandits
. And check out the excellent Beliefnet gallery by Laura Sheahen about the lessons we learn from Harry Potter

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Thanks, Kathy. I am sorry you and your daughter were disappointed. I loved the book, but it is a difficult one to adapt for film because it is very exposition-heavy. Books have room for a lot of internal information and a lot of explanation but movies have to be visual (and this movie did a beautiful job of conveying a lot of what was going on with images). And even a big, big-budget film like this one cannot afford to fly in all of the relevant actors for the funeral scene. Given what they had to work with, I thought this film worked very well as a movie and not as a paragraph-for-paragraph rendition of the book.
I really appreciate your taking the time to write and I know your comments will be of great help in guiding other parents as they consider whether this movie is right for them and their families.
I finally saw the movie on Saturday, and I can't wait to see it again (and to see the final two-part version of Book 7).
Yes, it is very different from the book, but it included my favorite parts from HBP, especially the Love Potion/Ron stuff. The Bill and Fleur and the battle at the end would have killed the movie, because there was just too much of it, and I thought the adaptors did a good job of introducing the evil werewolf character.
Alan Rickman was great as Snape, as usual. And mmmmm.... he's wonderful. My personal favorite scene was Ron in the Hospital Wing after almost dying, as Lavender Brown makes a scene. The adult witnesses (Snape, McGonagall, and Dumbledore) were so much funnier because they basically maintained straight faces while this comedy was playing out in front of them.
Jim Broadbent was brilliant as Slughorn - so fragile and touching. What great acting. And Michael Gambon, ditto. Since seeing the movie, I've reread Books 1 and 2.
Agreed on all counts, Alicia! Alan Rickman and Maggie Smith are my favorite parts of the films.
This is a pretty good movie, but it leaves out a lot. It doesnt always explain whats going on and sometimes it gets boring. The beginning and middle is intense, but then it gets sad when someone dies. I reccomend this movie for people who are Harry Potter fans and for people over the age of 10. I think this movie deserves 3 and a half stars.
Thanks, Annie! Very fair and very helpful.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.