Movie Mom

Movie Mom

The Proposal

posted by Nell Minow | 8:00am Wednesday October 14, 2009
B+
Lowest Recommended Age:Middle School
MPAA Rating:Rated PG-13 for sexual content, nudity and language
Profanity:About 20 bad words, some crude
Nudity/Sex:Sexual references, nudity (nothing shown) including male stripper
Alcohol/Drugs:Social drinking, character abuses alcohol
Violence/Scariness:Comic peril, apparent illness
Diversity Issues:Diverse characters
Movie Release Date:June 19, 2009
DVD Release Date:October 13, 2009

Think “Taming of the Shrew Wears Prada.” Book editor Margaret (Sandra Bullock) is whip-smart and whippet-thin, ferociously competent, ruthlessly demanding, and just plain scary. When she strides into the office in her spike Christian Louboutin heels, IMs radiate through the company: “The witch is on her broom!” And everyone switches into high-productivity mode. She is all-business, ambitious, and ferocious. When we first see her, she is riding her exercise bicycle indoors front of a video of the outdoors but even that does not hold her attention; she is also reading a manuscript.

Andrew (Ryan Reynolds) is her assistant. For three beleaguered years, he has been at her beck and call 24/7, from her morning coffee to midnight runs to giving up his grandmother’s 90th birthday party so he can work all weekend. She treats him like something between a prop and a galley slave. In other words, they’re made for each other and we will have the pleasure of seeing them figure that out.

The structure is familiar — and overly revealed in the trailer — but the comic timing is impeccable, with Betty White adding sparkle as Andrew’s 90-year-old “Gammy.” Bullock is just the actress to show us the vulnerability that makes Margaret hold on so tightly and Reynolds is strong enough (he was the bad guy in “Wolverine” after all) to keep Andrew from seeming henpecked and deft enough to make us see why he is up to Margaret’s level. The Alaskan scenery is like a commercial for Sarah Palin’s travel bureau and it is spicy without being smarmy, an increasingly rare achievement for date movies these days.



Previous Posts

Winner: Lady and the Tramp Giveaway
Thanks to all who entered!  The lucky winner is Patricia C. of Bakerstown, PA    

posted 6:41:22pm Feb. 15, 2012 | read full post »

You Will Never See a Sweeter Valentine Love Story Than This One
Suggested by my darling daughter: [iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WNfvuJr9164" title="Danny and Annie -- from Storycorps" style="(css style)" height="315" width="560"]  

posted 8:51:31pm Feb. 14, 2012 | read full post »

The Loving Story
Tonight HBO premieres a new documentary about one of the most important marriages in American history.  And their name was Loving. They should have been able to have the quiet life they hoped for.  Mildred and Richard Loving were residents of Virginia who were married in the District of Columbi

posted 12:48:14pm Feb. 14, 2012 | read full post »

Interview: The Real Couple Behind "The Vow"
“The Vow,” starring Channing Tatum and Rachel McAdams, is based on the real-life story of Kim and Krickett Carpenter, who wrote a book about their experience after a traumatic brain injury shortly after their wedding erased all of Krickett’s memory of the previous 18 months. She did not rememb

posted 8:00:42am Feb. 14, 2012 | read full post »

List: Movies for Your Valentine
Some of my favorite movie romances are just right for Valentine's Day.  Cuddle up with your valentine and a bowl of popcorn and enjoy these movies about how love makes us crazy and immeasurably happy at the same time. 1. Moonstruck Cher won an Oscar as the bookkeeper who has given up on love unt

posted 4:08:39pm Feb. 13, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(26)
post a comment
Mike

posted June 19, 2009 at 10:18 am


“Taming of the Shrew meets Prada” – that a good way of looking at this. I thought the casting is what made this movie work. Sure, it’s predictable, and I guess it has been done before in some way, but it’s funny, isn’t boring, and is a good story overall.



report abuse
 

iorek

posted June 19, 2009 at 12:06 pm


Ryan Reynolds always looks a little befuddled– maybe it’s that vacant look in his eyes, or perhaps they are just too far apart. It’s hard to imagine the loser from Definitely Maybe filling the role you describe.



report abuse
 

Tim1974

posted June 20, 2009 at 4:17 pm


I like the premise of the film. I believe from your review that it will provide some humor, some a little spicy, but in no way rude or crude. I think Betty White will give the film that little extra humor which will help make this a good “fun” film to enjoy. Now if I can just find time to catch up on those flms that I have wanted to see.



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted June 21, 2009 at 9:29 am


Happy Father’s Day, Tim!



report abuse
 

Tim1974

posted June 21, 2009 at 3:28 pm


Thanks Nell, I appreciate your comment !



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted June 22, 2009 at 10:31 am


Heard earlier this morning that this Sandra Bullock movie was #1 at the boxoffice this weekend – $34 Mil! I adore Sandra Bullock and I adore Alaska where I lived for two years! YEAH Sandra!



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted June 22, 2009 at 10:36 am


I’m thrilled for her as producer and star of the movie — she is at the top of her game and this is by far her best opening weekend ever. Go Sandra!



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted June 22, 2009 at 2:02 pm


I saw this movie on Saturday and absolutely LOVED it! Sandra Bulluck is back to her familiar comedy/love story. I cannot say enough wonderful things about Ryan Reynolds – I have been watching him since he was on the small screen in “Two Guys, A Girl and a Pizza Place.” Their onscreen chemistry is so much fun to watch! A movie you should definitely see!



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted June 22, 2009 at 10:24 pm


A great comment, thanks! I’m so glad you enjoyed the movie.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted June 22, 2009 at 10:42 pm


should my twelve year old girl (going in to the seventh grade) be able to see this movie? i think it’s okay but i wanted to make sure



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted June 22, 2009 at 11:02 pm


I’d say 12 is a little young for this movie. While it is on the soft side of a PG-13, it does have some strong language and sexual humor.



report abuse
 

Tim1974

posted June 23, 2009 at 2:42 pm


I saw the film and thoroughly enjoyed it. I found it to be a good, fun show. I thought the inclusion of Betty White added that little extra humor. I thought Sandra Bullock and Ryan Reynolds worked well together. I would also compliment the director for making a fun film, while being a bit naughty, without being crude, vulgar, or including in your face nudity.



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted June 23, 2009 at 3:58 pm


Agreed on all counts, Tim! Thanks for letting me know.



report abuse
 

pam

posted July 1, 2009 at 12:56 am


I found the movie disgusting when the guy gyrated on the stage. I mean, gross. I’m surprised anyone else thought that was “mild”. Have we become so callous at such things that we would allow our sweet young daughters to sit next to us at the movies and watch such trash?
I love Sandra Bullock, and I also enjoy Ryan Reynolds, but that alone couldn’t save it from the gross scenes. And what’s with the dogs humping?



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted July 1, 2009 at 2:31 am


Thanks, Pam. I did not like that scene, either. The MPAA considers “comic” sexuality like that dance number to be more funny than raunchy, and that includes the dogs, etc.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted July 4, 2009 at 3:57 pm


I loved this movie and saw it twice – once on a date with my hubby of 22 years and once with my teenaged daughters as a girls night out. Sandra Bullock and Ryan Reynolds have great chemistry on-screen that they themselves say comes from their long friendship. They reminded me of what I liked about movies like “It Happened One Night” or any of the Tracy/Hepburn movies – fast/funny/intelligent dialogue, funny scenes that don’t smack you in the face and say “laugh”, characters that make me want them to get together in the end. (This is a romantic comedy!) I like the fact that Ryan Reynolds doesn’t over react to all the funny going on around him. He’s more reactive and let’s the laugh come to you. The “nude scene” is more funny than sexy and was meant to be that way. You don’t have to “do it” to make the chemistry come alive. The bachelorette party scene was funny in a silly way because of Sandra Bullock’s reactions.
I haven’t laughed out loud like this at the movies in a long time!



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted July 4, 2009 at 5:26 pm


A great comment, thanks! I agree with you about the chemistry. Both Bullock and Reynolds are at their best in this film.



report abuse
 

Joanie

posted July 17, 2009 at 10:08 pm


I am not a “chick flick” type of gal, but this movie was really funny and different, and I LOVED the washrag scene, lol.
Movie is NOT realistic, but neither is Star Wars. So anyway, I enjoyed the heck out of it and laughed and laughed.
And for me, the Action/Adventure mom, that is saying alot! (No, I didn’t take the kids, went by myself).



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted July 17, 2009 at 10:58 pm


Thanks, Joanie! I’m so glad you enjoyed it!



report abuse
 

Jackie Sanders

posted October 15, 2009 at 2:07 pm


then they are gonna need a bachelorette party… believe me



report abuse
 

sc

posted November 2, 2009 at 5:16 pm


When you say a dozen bad words, what are you calling bad words?
The world has become desensitized to what I call vulgar language and I hate being surprised while watching a fun comedy. Can you help me out?



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted November 2, 2009 at 10:51 pm


I am referring to the usual four-letter words. Most PG-13 movies have some s-words, some d-words, and one or two f-words. If the movie includes words that are unusually graphic or offensive (ethnic slurs, harsh insults), I try to mention that as well. I share your disappointment with the paucity of vocabulary and the crudity of the language in today’s films.



report abuse
 

Colorado Kid

posted February 10, 2010 at 8:27 pm


I was very surprised that this was rated PG-13. I was caught off guard by the scenario showing nudity. It was amazing to me that Sandra Bullock showed so much skin. I would not consider this the mild side of PG-13.
On the good side I found it very funny and found myself laughing out loud. Perhaps this is why I took offense to the unexpected scene.



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted February 10, 2010 at 9:13 pm


I’m sorry to say that is what PG-13 is these days, Colorado Kid. Unless body parts you don’t see on the beach are shown, it is still a PG-13. This is actually mild by PG-13 standards in that the behavior of the people involved does not include having sex and while there is some racy humor — the “exotic dancer,” the “it’s the morning” line, etc. — it is about at or below the level you would get on prime time television.
I’m glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for the comment.



report abuse
 

Pingback: The Worst Movie Bosses | Christian Media Cross

Pingback: The Worst Movie Bosses - Movie Mom

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.