Movie Mom
Sponsored by:  

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

Tuesday October 20, 2009

C
Audience: High School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi action violence, language, some crude and sexual material, and brief drug material
Profanity: Some strong and crude language
Nudity/Sex: Some vulgar sexual references and skimpy clothes
Alcohol/Drugs: Character inadvertantly ingests drugs and behaves in a silly manner, some student drinking
Violence/Scariness: Constant action peril and violence (not much blood) with many characters injured and killed
Diversity Issues: Some ethnic humor that may be offensive
Movie Release Date: June 25, 2009
DVD Release Date: October 20, 2009

Oh, dear. #TransformerFail

I truly loved the first Transformers movie. It was everything you need in a big summer explosion movie, with stupendous special effects, shot through with heart-thumping adrenaline, with just enough character and storyline to allow us to catch our breath and keep us interested. Our hero, high school senior Sam (Shia LeBeouf), is befriended by a car that turns into a friendly robot called Bumblebee, one of a cadre of good-guy transforming robots who fight against the bad-guy robots, called Decepticons. He is aided by a beautiful girl who is very good with cars (Megan Fox) and an armed services division led by Captain Lennox (Josh Duhamel).

This sequel has some great special effects, but the story and the characters are poorly handled and the pacing is a mess. When the robots give a better performance than the humans, we have a problem. When the action is so complicated we can't figure out who is where and in some cases why they are there, we have a bigger problem. When the characters are so irritating we begin to consider rooting for the bad guys, well, you know what kind of a problem we have. And when the racial humor gets so completely out of hand that it becomes uncomfortable at best and genuinely disturbing at worst, it's a serious problem.

LeBoeuf is always appealing, Fox looks good stretching over machinery, and the movie briefly takes an interesting turn when both human and transformer characters show that they can learn from their mistakes and switch over to the side of the good guys. A stop at the Smithsonian's Air and Space Museum leads to Jetfire, an engaging junkpile of an autobot.

But it is too loud and it all goes on much too long. The bloated running time is well over two hours, overstuffed with pointless and increasingly annoying attempts at comedy -- Sam's mother accidentally gets high and talks about his sex life, Sam's father doesn't get high but talks about his sex life, good guy robots talk like the end men on a minstrel show, and Sam's college roommate is a loudmouth who wants to get with some ladies and shrieks like a little girl when he is scared, which happens a lot. There's another series of confrontations between a clueless bureaucrat and our know-better heroes. But the last movie's clueless bureaucrat somehow switches sides. I would complain that this is not adequately explained, but I don't really care. By this point, I began to think the Decepticons might have a point about how they could do better with our planet than we could.

Parents should know that this film includes very intense and graphic peril and "action" violence (meaning not much blood), many characters injured and killed, some strong and crude language and vulgar sexual humor, some humor based on racial and ethnic stereotypes, and a character who unintentionally takes drugs and there is some silly behavior while intoxicated.

Family discussion: Why is Sam reluctant to get involved? What should Captain Lennox do when he has orders that are contrary to what he believes is right? Did the racial humor in this movie seem appropriate?

If you like this, try: the first "Transformers" movie and the original television series and "Iron Man"

Advertisement
Comments
Nell Minow
July 17, 2009 10:17 AM
http://blog.beliefnet.com/moviemom/

Thank you, Rina. I was terribly disappointed, too.

LC
July 20, 2009 12:47 PM

Movie Mom: Please explain (explicitly) what you mean by "racial humor" and please point out specific references in the movie of this "racial humor".

I would suggest in the future, to be more explicit in your review if you are going to reference controversial topics, such as "racial humor".

I look forward to your response.

Thanks.

Nell Minow
July 20, 2009 10:47 PM
http://blog.beliefnet.com/moviemom/

Thanks for the comment, LC. When I say "racial humor" or "gender humor" or "ethnic humor" it means comedy based on exaggerated or sterotypical racial, ethnic, or gender characteristics often associated with bias. In this film, I found he portrayal of the "gangsta" robots who could not/did not read and the portrayal of the Latino roommate as offensive and based on racial and ethnic stereotypes. What did you think of these portrayals?

Toby Clark
August 1, 2009 4:45 AM

The bad: The script was generally mediocre, most obviously pretty much every scene with Sam's parents (I don't know who thought the dogs would be a good idea.) For me, the single worst line of the film was when Optimus asks Galloway what happens if the Autobots leave and he's wrong and Lennox redundantly replies "That's a good question."

Also, I would have liked to see more of Isabel Lucas, who I know from the Australian soap opera Home and Away - the same one Chris Hemsworth (Kirk's father in the new Star Trek) was on, and around the same time. It would have been cool if they'd done something with her natural resemblance to Rachel Taylor, the analyst from the first one.


The good: It was a decent, generally coherent exploration of the Transformers mythos (speaking as a very casual fan of the first one), with more Transformer action than the first, which didn't start to get boring until the Egypt scenes. The Sam-Mikaela chemistry was still there and I liked the new characters Jetfire and Wheelie. I also didn't mind Leo, although I can see your point about the stereotypes in his and the Twins' portrayal (although I don't know that Jazz in the first one was much better).

Nell Minow
August 1, 2009 2:32 PM
http://blog.beliefnet.com/moviemom/

Thanks so much, Toby! I wish you were the one producing the film; it would have been much better.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Movie Mom

Ethics and Family

Islam
Beliefnet's Family Values Toolkit offers age-specific resources to help kids navigate difficult decisions.
View the Toolkit

Categories

All Current Releases DVDs Shorts Add category
Environment/Green Features & Top 10s Festivals Holidays Internet and Gaming Lists Media Appearances Music Opening This Week Q&As Television

About Movie Mom


Movie Mom's Archives
Movie Mom's full archives of more than 1,400 reviews (including her 200 best films for families) and 400 blog posts is now on Beliefnet for searching.

Movie Mom is a registered trademark of Nell Minow.

Copyright 1995-2009 Nell Minow. All Rights Reserved.

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.