I was looking forward to Adam Lambert's performance on the American Music Awards last night because I was impressed with his ability and stage presence on "American Idol." The show included some of the industry's biggest stars, but they saved him for the last song of the night and really built it up as something special. Knowing that his first album has been released to such glowing reviews heightened the anticipation.
So it was a terrible disappointment to see the almost desperate gyrations that were not just awkward and vulgar but a distraction from the song he was trying to deliver. Wearing some sort of outfit that looked like a spacesuit from a cheesy 1950's sci-fi movie, Lambert made the number into a quick trip through a manual of sex acts. According to a slightly stunned Entertainment Weekly column by a committed Idol fan, the song featured:
Adam dragging a female backup dancer across the stage by her leg, as if she were a lace-covered sack of potatoes; Adam grasping the head of a submissive-styled male backup dancer and pulling him into an uncomfortable round of simulated oral sex (while ABC muted the audio to protect us from who only knows what); a tutu-clad woman cupping Adam's nether-regions; Adam grasping and snapping the leather "bikini area" (for lack of a better term) of a female dancer's costume; and Adam taking a break from his singing duties for an impromptu game of tongue twister with a keyboardist of indeterminate gender.
Was Lambert trying to get Britney-kisses-Madonna headlines? Was the Idol contestant making up for lost time playing coy about his sexual orientation until after the Idol votes were in and he came in second? Is there any chance it was a genuine expression of some artistic statement by this very commercially-oriented performer?
EW says it was more likely to be the former:
But the bottom line is that Adam's AMA performance felt less like a genuine expression of his high-octane sexuality (so playfully erotic when he fondled the mic stand during "Whole Lotta Love" this summer), and more like a carefully planned stab at dominating the post-AMA blogosphere/water-cooler discussion. I'm certainly no prude...the idea of saucy boy-on-boy/boy-on-girl/boy-on-not-quite-sure action does not rattle my cage -- certainly not at 10:55 p.m. on a school night. And yet, what's sad is that unlike, say, a J.Lo or even a Rihanna, Adam could've had tongues wagging just from his vocals alone. Instead, that golden voice took a backseat tonight at the AMAs, and I'm not sure exactly who was occupying the driver's seat.
The Parents Television Council has issued a statement objecting to the performance and called on its members to express their concern to the network, Dick Clark Productions and the show's advertisers.
"American teenagers - and especially teenaged girls - are literally under siege by the entertainment media. It is outrageous that children today cannot watch a televised awards program for an industry that is built squarely on their backs. Teens comprise a huge portion of music sales, yet this is how they are treated? It is beyond contemptible," said PTC President Tim Winter.
ABC has already received thousands of complaints, which it described as a "moderate" response, according to the Huffington Post. Lambert "told CNN that his kiss was 'in the moment' and that if people were upset about it, 'That's a form of discrimination and it's too bad.'"
The kiss was not the problem. And the objections are not discrimination. The star of a top-rated show that is often watched by families chose to pay less attention to staying on pitch and delivering a top-quality musical performance than to a desperate, clumsy, and crude effort to be shocking.
To send your objections to ABC, use this form. You can reach Dick Clark Productions at 2900 Olympic Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90404
310-255-4600
To speak with a representative from the Parents Television Council, please contact Kelly Oliver (ext. 140) or Megan Franko (ext. 148) at (703) 683-5004.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I take it you fundies missed the rest of the show, in which Janet Jackson grabbed the crotch of one of her male dancers, Eminem rapped about how many rapes and murders "Slim Shady" has committed, and Lady Gaga performed in what amounted to a bodysuit with a large bandaid over her crotch and some electronic bones for decoration.
ABC hyped the performance throughout the entire show as something that would be shocking. Why are people surprised that it was exactly what they said it would be? Awards shows are always full of sexualized, moderately trashy attention-whoring performances. They're not a family thing, that's why they're almost always rated TV-14 and shown in the prime time to post-prime time slots. (Lambert performed at nearly 11 PM on both coasts - why weren't children sleeping?)
You don't have to like it, but don't pretend that sexualized performances at music awards shows are something brand new.
Did you watch American Idol last year? They had Flo Rida sing a song that was only about oral sex with scantily clad women dancing! Did you complain or write an article about that? No,Its not really a family show.
The AMA show was rate PG 14! Parents, sorry,you were warned ahead. TIVO is your friend. Why are you singling out Adam Lambert? The show also contained other objectionable content for children. Janet grabbed a guy's crotch. Eminem rapped that he had 17 rapes under his belt. Rihanna's dancers had guns and she sang about Russian Roulette.(But violence is okay, right?) Gaga broke an empty bottle of whiskey. Where is your concern about these acts?
So to me,your rant screams of discrimination.
Kim, I am sorry my objections seem discriminatory. I am very GLBT-friendly, as you can see if you read more of what I write. I did not watch the entire AMA show, but what I did watch deleted a lot of the lyrics that might have been objectionable for broadcast. I still think that Lambert's performance was both poor and in poor taste, and misjudged his audience.
I appreciate your writing and think you make some good points but I think your post is more of a rant than my comment. Thanks again and best wishes for a great Thanksgiving for you and your family.
Marcus, I appreciate your comment, but please read a little more on the site before you start throwing around terms like "fundie." Just a reminder -- the rules of this site prohibit name-calling. Insult is not argument. I am not endorsing the rest of the performances by singling out Lambert. But it seems to me he pulled something of a bait and switch. Eminem and Lady Gaga have been clear from the beginning about who and what they are and who their audience is. But if you will read what I wrote you will see that my point was that Lambert sacrificed what he is best at -- singing -- just to be outrageous and shocking, delivering something that was very different from what his fans expected in a manner that I thought was cynical and a little contemptuous of the people who voted for him on Idol. So if you would like to comment on that point, I'd be glad to hear your thoughts. Thanks for writing and best wishes for a wonderful Thanksgiving for you and your family.
Well, I am sure that Kanye West is relieved. This took the attention off of him.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.