Movie Mom

Movie Mom

Jennifer’s Body

posted by Nell Minow
B-
Lowest Recommended Age:Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating:Rated R for sexuality, bloody violence, language and brief drug use
Profanity:Very strong language
Nudity/Sex:Explicit sexual references, some crude, and situations
Alcohol/Drugs:Drinking, drug use
Violence/Scariness:Intense and graphic violence, characters injured, killed, and eaten
Diversity Issues:None
Movie Release Date:September 18, 2009
DVD Release Date:December 29, 2009

“Jennifer’s Body” is not scary enough for horror and not knowing enough for commentary on horror.

“Hell is a teenage girl,” says Needy (Amanda Seyfried of “Mama Mia” and “Big Love”). And she should know. She is a teenage girl. And her Best Friend Forever Jennifer (made-for-Maxim hottie Megan Fox of the “Transformers” films) is both, quite literally. She may wear a BFF charm in recognition of friendship going back to the sandbox days, but she is more of a frenemy, one of those people who are in our life and have great powers of influence even though we are not sure why and we don’t like them very much. Jennifer tells the appropriately-nicknamed Needy (for Anita) to break a date with her boyfriend Chip (Johnny Simmons) and accompany Jennifer to the town’s only club/bar so they can watch an up-and-coming group called “Low Shoulder.” Needy says yes to Jennifer, no to Chip, and they are on their way.

Some nasty things happen, and Jennifer turns into a demon who preys on the bodies of helpless and terrified victims. (They have to be helpless and terrified; she’s something of a picky eater in that respect.) Needy is the only one who sees her for what she is, and as the remains begin to pile up and funerals clog everyone’s schedules, Needy has to figure out what to do. And it wouldn’t be a horror movie if it didn’t get personal.

When Diablo Cody (“Juno” and many opinionated but very cool and clever essays in Entertainment Weekly) takes on the horror genre, it is fair to expect some snappy honest-to-blog patter and if not obvious po-mo air quotes at least something a little meta. But it does not work as straight-on horror or as what has now become an established and rich little sub-genre of the snarky, self-aware horror film that delivers on two levels, like the “Scream” series, “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” or “Shaun of the Dead.”

It actually is not that much of a stretch between “straight” horror and meta-horror. Straight-on horror films deliver thrills with a combination of the predictable (woe to any teenager who has sex and if the camera zooms in close, there’s something terrible just out of frame) and the unpredictable (you know, the part where some one or some thing jumps out and splits some hapless victim down the middle). And they often have a sense of humor about themselves and their conventions, with serial killers Freddy Kruger (of “Nightmare on Elm Street”) and Chuckie (the demon doll) tossing off wisecracks and bad puns as they slaughter.

Cody has a few nice points to make here about the frenemy dynamic of some girl-girl relationships: the drama, the connection, the power plays, and the excitement. “Not high school evil; evil-evil” is an theme worth exploring, but it is hard to improve on “Buffy.” The idea of the indie band’s song “Through the Trees” being used at the candlelight vigils for the dead classmates is well-handled. And there are some cutesy winks at the audience, as when the indie band talks about getting on a movie soundtrack as a path to fame and fortune, as happened to the Moldy Peaches on the soundtrack of “Juno.” Casting everyone’s favorite boy next door Adam Brody as an “agent of Satan with a really awesome haircut” is fun. Director Karyn Kusama and cinematographer M. David Mullen find some striking compositions, though it is unfortunate that a pool scene recalls the much better teen vampire movie “Let the Right One In.” And what is the deal with that 80′s prom dress? Now that’s horror.



You Might Also Like...
Previous Posts

New DVD Giveaway: Word Girl vs. The Energy Monster
One of my favorite television series for kids is the wonderful PBS show "Word Girl," and this new release is one of the best: Wordgirl vs the Energy Monster. WORDGIRL and her sidekick CAPTAIN HUGGY FACE fight the good fight against dastardly villains and bad vocabulary in this thrilling collection!

posted 8:00:22am May. 19, 2013 | read full post »

Disney Lets Merida Be Merida After All
Did the folks at Disney even watch "Brave?"  One of the great strengths of Pixar's first movie starring a female character (and its first originally written by a woman, Brenda Chapman, though she was replaced by a male director) was that its feisty heroine, Merida, looked like a real girl and not a

posted 8:00:52am May. 18, 2013 | read full post »

Want to Know What James Franco Thinks of "The Great Gatsby?"
I'm interested in James Franco's take on "The Great Gatsby" because of what this polymath who attended two grad schools at once has to say about the challenges of adapting great writing to the screen and the differing goals and audience expectations of a book now viewed as a classic and a movie. Th

posted 8:00:42am May. 17, 2013 | read full post »

Interview: Directors/Writer/Star of "Desperate Acts of Magic"
Magic is in the air.  And on the screen.  Two big-budget films with some of Hollywood's biggest stars playing magicians are being released within a few months of each other.  In March, we had the silly comedy The Incredible Burt Wonderstone, with Steve Carell and Jim Carrey.  Coming up is the en

posted 8:00:21am May. 17, 2013 | read full post »

Star Trek: Into Darkness
This time, there's crying in "Star Trek."  And some very significant time on Earth as well.  This story is in the most literal sense, close to home. Writer-director J.J. Abrams, who rebooted Gene Roddenberry's original "Star Trek" saga with a rousing 2009 origin story prequel now takes us clos

posted 9:36:25am May. 16, 2013 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
barbara

posted September 18, 2009 at 12:23 am


18th sep is most waiting day for me as Jennifer’s body movie release. have you watch Jennifer’s body movie trailer. it was amazing to see Megan Fox’s actions. though it seems bit of lustful movie goes in very horrific way. i just love to watch her sexy blood sucking demon character.



report abuse
 

blank dvd

posted September 29, 2009 at 8:31 am


Accrding to me The movie could of been better, with a rated r movie you should of been able to see boobs and much more gore. That’s just my opinion,? my g/f loved it, but that’s just because, well she is she, lol



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted September 29, 2009 at 9:25 am


Thanks, blank dvd — now we know who this movie’s target audience is!



report abuse
 

clé usb

posted November 2, 2009 at 4:14 am


Jennifer’s Body comes loaded with a pretty big freight of expectations. It’s nice to see Fox take a role that will ultimately be overshadowed by her co-star’s. The performances are great.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted December 31, 2009 at 6:41 am


Please proof read, or have someone proof read your posts before you post them. This is so hard to read because the sentence structure is so bad and the grammar is wacked.



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted December 31, 2009 at 8:15 am


Sorry to hear that! My readers are my best copy editors and I welcome corrections. If you let me know what you found hard to understand, I’ll do my best to correct it.



report abuse
 

Charles

posted March 13, 2010 at 3:17 pm


I just watched this on DVD, Nell, and I have to say I found your review of the movie to be, well, overly generous! To me, it was wrong on so many levels. Too many loose threads that were never explained really ruined it for me (and I’m not refering to the main, central ‘loose thread’, which was exactly how Jennifer becomes the demon…it was okay to leave that up to the audience’s imagination). Why would a deer lick blood? What’s with the teacher with the missing hand? More importantly, the portrayal of the school’s teenage population as wanting nothing but sex was ridiculous and demeaning. That is not to say it needed to be total absent from the movie (i.e. as the tool that Jennifer uses to lure in her hormone-ravaged male victims), but some of the ‘soft-porn’ scenes were totally uncalled for and added nothing to the movie.
I was blown away that both of these actresses, who have already found fame and fortune in the movies, had to stoop to such a low. What is with that, anyways?



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted March 13, 2010 at 6:19 pm


Hi, Charles! Great comment. I’m not sure we were so far apart. You can see from the first sentence that I do not consider it successful, but, like you, I did find some parts of it to be worthwhile. The plot holes and focus on teen sex, for better and worse, are slasher/horror film staples.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.





Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.