Movie Mom

Movie Mom

One for the Money

posted by Nell Minow
C
Lowest Recommended Age:Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating:Rated PG-13 for violence, sexual references and language, some drug material and partial nudity
Profanity:Strong and crude language for a PG-13, "crap," f-word
Nudity/Sex:Sexual references, some coarse, partial nudity including rear shot of a naked old man, prostitutes
Alcohol/Drugs:Drinking, drug dealing
Violence/Scariness:Crime-style violence with characters injured and killed, guns
Diversity Issues:Diverse characters, some stereotyping
Movie Release Date:January 27, 2012
DVD Release Date:May 15, 2012

Someday to be used in film schools as a textbook example of how not to adapt a best-selling novel for the screen, “One for the Money” is mis-cast, mis-scripted, and mis-directed in every category.  Janet Evanovich’s popular series of series of books about lingerie saleswoman-turned bounty hunter Stephanie Plum seemed like a sure bet.  But what’s not a sure bet is an actress who signs on as producer so she can cast herself in what turns out to be a misbegotten vanity project.

Katherine Heigl is a beautiful actress whose greatest attribute is an imperishable freshness.  In the right movie, like “Knocked Up,” that works in her favor. Surrounded by the crudest possible material the contrast she provided gave warmth and romance to the film.  But her range is limited and she is way beyond her capacity as a gritty Jersey girl who once ran over the guy who never called after they had sex on the floor of the bakery where she was working.  Stephanie Plum is not supposed to be perky and adorable.  She’s supposed to be sadder but wiser, determined, and, above all, game.  Director Julie Ann Robinson has more experience with television (“Two Broke Girls,” Heigl’s “Grey’s Anatomy”) and never finds the right rhythm for the material.  It is lumpen and awkward and it telegraphs its surprises.  And just because it is written, directed, and produced by women does not keep it from being sexist, with some unfortunate stereotyped sassy black hookers thrown in for added discomfort.

YouTube Preview Image

It is hard to work up the energy to be offended by the stereotypes, though, when one is suffocating from the lethargy induced by the movie’s sluggish pacing and the fog induced by Heigl’s attempts at snappy dialog and a New Jersey accent.

Stephanie is a divorcee (“I had a husband.  I didn’t like it.  I don’t want another one.”) who lost her job selling lingerie and is about to lose her car for failure to keep up the payments.  Her cousin is a bail bondsman who needs someone to help with filing.  She blackmails him into giving it to her and then realizes that the real money is in bounty hunting and that the number one fugitive is Joe Morelli (Jason O’Mara), a cop charged with murder who in one of the movie’s most tiresome contrivances, has a past connection with Stephanie.  Everyone in Trenton has a past connection with Stephanie.

We are then treated to a series of scenes in which Stephanie gets some guidance on bounty hunting from the hunky Ranger (Daniel Sunjata, another “Grey’s Anatomy” transplant) and has a series of cat-and-mouse encounters with Joe (the hunky Jason O’Mara of “Life on Mars”), trading painful quips that are supposed to be flirtatious but thud with a squish like overripe grapefruit.  The mixed messages (Joe may be on the lam and handcuff her, naked, to the shower rod but he brings her coffee in bed) would be annoying if the whole movie was not too lethargic to merit that much attention.

 

Parents should know that this movie has some rough material for a PG-13, including strong and crude language, sexual references and partial nudity, drug dealing, and violence (characters injured and killed).

Family discussion: What makes Stephanie good at her job?  What makes her like this job?

If you like this, try: the books by Janet Evanovich and the far better (R-rated) bounty hunter movie, “Midnight Run”



You Might Also Like...
Previous Posts

See "Star Trek: Into Darkness" Stars in This Underrated British Gem
Long before they starred in this week's "Star Trek: Into Darkness," Benedict Cumberbatch and Alice Eve appeared in the sweet indie romantic comedy "Starter for 10," also featuring James McAvoy ("X-Men First Class") and Rebecca Hall ("Iron Man 3"). [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5JwoOHPm

posted 3:59:12pm May. 19, 2013 | read full post »

New DVD Giveaway: Word Girl vs. The Energy Monster
One of my favorite television series for kids is the wonderful PBS show "Word Girl," and this new release is one of the best: Wordgirl vs the Energy Monster. WORDGIRL and her sidekick CAPTAIN HUGGY FACE fight the good fight against dastardly villains and bad vocabulary in this thrilling collection!

posted 8:00:22am May. 19, 2013 | read full post »

Disney Lets Merida Be Merida After All
Did the folks at Disney even watch "Brave?"  One of the great strengths of Pixar's first movie starring a female character (and its first originally written by a woman, Brenda Chapman, though she was replaced by a male director) was that its feisty heroine, Merida, looked like a real girl and not a

posted 8:00:52am May. 18, 2013 | read full post »

Want to Know What James Franco Thinks of "The Great Gatsby?"
I'm interested in James Franco's take on "The Great Gatsby" because of what this polymath who attended two grad schools at once has to say about the challenges of adapting great writing to the screen and the differing goals and audience expectations of a book now viewed as a classic and a movie. Th

posted 8:00:42am May. 17, 2013 | read full post »

Interview: Directors/Writer/Star of "Desperate Acts of Magic"
Magic is in the air.  And on the screen.  Two big-budget films with some of Hollywood's biggest stars playing magicians are being released within a few months of each other.  In March, we had the silly comedy The Incredible Burt Wonderstone, with Steve Carell and Jim Carrey.  Coming up is the en

posted 8:00:21am May. 17, 2013 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(9)
post a comment
Big Dave

posted January 30, 2012 at 12:15 pm


You didn’t say whether you’re fan of the Stephanie Plum series. That may have made a difference. My wife and her sister have read all the books, some more than once. They found the movie entertaining though they were troubled as well by the casting, except for Lulu’s character. They thought she was spot-on. Since I was dragged along too, I’ll say the movie was watchable but no better in quality than many of the made-for-TV movies you can see any day. Okay, since I’m a guy, I’ll admit I liked the scene with Katherine Heigl handcuffed in the shower. THAT you won’t see in a made for TV movie.



report abuse
 

    Nell Minow

    posted January 31, 2012 at 8:00 pm


    Thanks, Big Dave. Glad to hear that fans of the book thought the movie had some merit.



    report abuse
     

April

posted February 1, 2012 at 1:22 pm


I think maybe you are not a fan of Janet’s books or maybe didn’t read them all. Some of your negative comments are about scenes that actually happen in the book. I agree that some of the casting would not have been my first choice (Ranger for example) but I think if you are a fan of the books you will enjoy the movie.



report abuse
 

    Nell Minow

    posted February 2, 2012 at 7:09 am


    Thanks, April! I didn’t object to the characters or the incidents, just the way they were adapted to the screen. If it had had a different cast and director it could have been as good as the books.



    report abuse
     

JACK

posted February 7, 2012 at 6:51 pm


I like stereotypes, and I find them Funny. Also I’m proud to be sexist



report abuse
 

    Nell Minow

    posted February 8, 2012 at 10:33 am


    Thanks, Jack, you are hilarious! Fortunately for you, I always mention those elements of a movie so keep coming back for guidance to help you find the movies you will enjoy.



    report abuse
     

Rebecca

posted February 14, 2012 at 6:08 pm


I am reading her entire series of books – I am up to book 14, and love them!! I hesitate to see the movie because I don’t want the ‘characters’ to ruin the rest of the books for me. I just can’t see the characters that were chosen to match up what is in my mind when I read the books. Thanks for the information – I will hold off on seeing the movie for now. Thanks!



report abuse
 

    Nell Minow

    posted February 15, 2012 at 1:14 pm


    I totally understand, Rebecca!



    report abuse
     

Sarash

posted February 19, 2012 at 7:15 am


I love the books ,but the movies was so sad and flat it was also cut all over the place with no flow and no laugh out loud comedy.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.





Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.