Recently in Understanding Media and Pop Culture Category

Pixar is the most successful movie studio in history, with every one of its 10 films a critical and box office success. But not one of those ten films has featured a female lead. There have been memorable girls and women in films like "The Incredibles," "Finding Nemo," and "A Bug's Life," but the main action has gone to the male characters -- in "Up" the only female other than the main character's late wife, who never speaks, is a bird. That will change with two of Pixar's upcoming releases, according to Willa Paskin on Slate sister site Double XX.

The first film, Newt, out in 2011, imagines "What happens when the last remaining male and female blue-footed newts on the planet are forced together by science to save the species, and they can't stand each other?" This sounds like the animated version of It Happened One Night (plus a few action sequences), so, you know, sign me up. The second film, The Bear and The Bow, will be even more girlcentric, telling the tale of "the impetuous, tangle-haired Merida, [who] though a daughter of royalty, would prefer to make her mark as a great archer." It's also set to come out 2011 and will be voiced by Reese Witherspoon.

Paskin wonders whether we really need another princess story, and I see her point. But I look forward to meeting these characters and to the reactions from girls -- and their brothers -- to seeing stories where girls get to take the lead.

Mickey Mouse is my favorite animated character. Part of the reason is historic -- he starred in the first movie to feature a synchronized soundtrack, "Steamboat Willie." And he was the first character and later the emblem for what would become Walt Disney Studios. Walt Disney lost the rights to his successful Oswald Rabbit character and decided to start his own studio with a new idea. As Disney said,

We thought of a tiny bit of a mouse that would have something of the wistfulness of Chaplin -- a little fellow trying to do the best he could. When people laugh at Mickey Mouse, it's because he's so human; and that is the secret of his popularity. I only hope that we don't lose sight of one thing -- that it was all started by a mouse.

My favorite Mickey appearance is in "Fantasia," where he plays the sorcerer's apprentice who gets into trouble when he tries to perform a little magic.

But Mickey has not been much more than a logo for quite a while. What I like best about him, his perpetually cheery outlook, is a challenge for film-makers. It is easier for them to write stories for characters who are frustrated (Donald Duck), clumsy (Goofy), or mischievous (Chip and Dale). As he gets ready to turn 81 on November 18, Mickey is getting more attention -- and a bit of a personality change. The New York Times reports that Mickey will star in a new video game and is getting a new look to go with a more aggressive persona. The game is "Epic Mickey, in which the formerly squeaky clean character can be cantankerous and cunning, as well as heroic, as he traverses a forbidding wasteland" battling none other than Oswald Rabbit. Players will be able to decide whether their Mickey character will be helpful or "selfish and destructive."

I understand that Disney wants to make Mickey Mouse relevant to a new generation. But I hope Disney remembers what makes Mickey so appealing. And I hope Disney pays attention to the lessons of "The Sorcerer's Apprentice" about how much trouble you can get into messing with magic.

Disney, which had to drop the word "educational" from its marketing of Baby Einstein DVDs following complaints from the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC), has now had to back down further and offer a refund.

The New York Times reports that the $200 million a year business, which is predicated on the idea that DVD-watching is beneficial to infants even though the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends no screen time of any kind, television, DVDs, or computers, before age 2, is so pervasive that as many as a third of all American babies have seen at least one of these DVDs. In what the company is calling an "enhanced consumer satisfaction guarantee" and the CCFC is characterizing as capitulation, the company will refund $15.99 for up to four "Baby Einstein" DVDs per household, bought between June 5, 2004, and Sept. 5, 2009, and returned to the company.

I have been a furious opponent of Baby Einstein and the other DVDs for infants since I published the one of the first exposes of them as a racket in the mainstream media, a 2005 article in the Chicago Tribune. When I was working on the article, a company representative's absurd response to my question about academic studies showing no benefits in learning from their products that their DVDs were "not research-based." The New York Times story reports that even though they had to remove the word "educational" from their literature following CCFC complaints and a Federal Trade Commission investigation, the website still promises "number recognition" and introduction of shapes. And, of course, the name itself implies that the products increase knowledge or intellectual capacity.

The academic studies show that what infants learn from watching a family member once takes them four times as long to absorb in a DVD. And the very act of watching a DVD with the pulsing refresh rate of the screen can be at the same time soporific and stimulating, making it more difficult for them to get restful sleep. The only thing they learn from these DVDs is how to watch television. Susan Linn of the CCFC was a terrific resource for me in my work on this issue and I am delighted to see her success in bringing to parents' attention how useless these DVDs are.

The savagely funny Washington Post television columnist Lisa de Moraes takes on the Heene family's lust for reality television fame. The Heenes and the family behind the balloon boy hoax and subsequent media blitz. Slate's Culture Gabfest noted that it was not until the post-rescue effort interviews that law enforcement suspected that the whole thing was a publicity stunt.

de Moraes notes that Lifetime has decided not to air the Heene family's previous attempt at reality television fame and fortune, an appearance on the "Wife Swap" series. I like the way she makes it clear that Lifetime should have pulled it from broadcast based on its exploitative and overall disgusting content, completely apart from the subsequent discrediting of the family's authenticity.

Lifetime...had no problem with Dad, a.k.a. Richard Heene, observing that "once a woman hits 25, it's all downhill from there," creating a "meter" to gauge his temporary, pretend wife's behavior and when she asked him to help around the house, shouting at her, "You're a man's nightmare! I'm so glad my wife was born in Japan. Nag, nag nag! Over 25 years old. You sag!"

Which we believe qualifies as not only sexist and ageist, but maybe also racist, which would make it a veritable Hat Trick of Prejudice.

It's one thing if the so-called adults in the Heene family want to humiliate themselves for fame and fortune; it's another to take young children into the media circus with them. We should think carefully about whether the Heene parents's behavior constitutes child abuse. And we should think even more carefully about the extent to which the robust ratings for this kind of reality television make us all enablers.

Huffington Post has got a list of the nine worst surprise endings in movie history (well, in the past few years). I was pleased to see three of my Gothika Rule picks on the list, "Perfect Stranger," "23," and "The Forgotten." (For newcomers -- the "Gothika Rule," named for a movie with one of the worst endings of all time, means that I will give away the surprise to anyone who sends me an email to save them what I had to suffer in watching it.) Be sure to check out the comments from readers with their own suggestions. I'd add "The Pink Jungle," "Desperate Measures," and, of course "Gothika." Any others?