Associated Press
Wal-Mart presented little new information in its first major report on efforts to become greener, but it was enough to encourage at least one environmental group which said the world’s largest retailer is trying.
The report released Thursday details dozens of programs ranging from environmental to economic development, employee health care and ethics in overseas factories where it buys goods.
Most have been reported previously, but the 64-page report is the first comprehensive catalog of dozens of programs, from organic cotton clothes to low-energy freezer cases, launched since Chief Executive Lee Scott set three green goals in October 2005.
Those goals are to be supplied 100 percent by renewable energy, to create zero waste and to sell products that help sustain resources and the environment. Scott did not set any timelines, although there are deadlines for some of the steps in striving for those goals.
Scott said in a foreword that the report shows Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is making progress, but still has work to do.
“We make no claims of being a green company. And we’re not saying we’re better than other companies. But what we are saying is we’re doing sustainability in a way that’s real and right for Wal-Mart and is touching the lives of millions of people around the world,” Scott wrote.
He reiterated Wal-Mart’s stated theory of two years ago, that reducing its environmental impact is a smart business move because it saves money and produces better products.
Environmental Defense, a group that works with large companies to help them design and implement green plans, welcomed the report.
“The company is moving in the right direction, and learning as it goes,” the group said in a statement. Environmental Defense is the only green group to open an office, with two staff members, in Wal-Mart’s headquarters town of Bentonville, Ark., to coordinate the effort.
Environmental Defense said, however, that Wal-Mart must provide more data and context in the sustainability report. For example, it said, the report lists new low-flow sinks that cut water use in some store bathrooms, but does not specify how many stores use the technology and what water use was before the installations.
“Our takeaway is that over the last two years, Wal-Mart has built the foundation for a robust environmental program with many innovative and potentially transformational projects,” Environmental Defense said.
On the other side, a coalition of 23 environmental and human rights groups that issued a report earlier this year critical of Wal-Mart’s efforts said it still believes Wal-Mart is simply too big and too reliant on global sourcing and shipping to be green.
“Our overall argument is that even if Wal-Mart achieved all of its stated goals, the company’s business model is inherently unsustainable,” said Sarah Anderson from the Institute for Policy Studies, one of the coalition groups along with union-backed WakeUpWalMart, Friends of the Earth and The Cornucopia Institute.
Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



posted November 15, 2007 at 7:30 pm
It takes longer to wash the soap off your hands now, but that’s life.
I hope they don’t only buy cotton, if they do the ladies and gentleman will have to drag their irons out, and use extra electicity.
posted November 15, 2007 at 9:38 pm
H22: What’s an iron??
Will remain to be seen if they actually get accomplished what they say they are trying. Their track record with howt hey treat their employees needs a lot of help.
posted November 15, 2007 at 10:24 pm
Talk about a giant “carbon footprint”. They have so much to do to make themselves even Charleston Green (so dark it looks almost black), that any step is an imporvement. Here’s to hoping they continue to lessen their presence environmentally, even if not economically.
posted November 17, 2007 at 8:09 pm
WALMART NEEDS TO START WITH THEIR STORE STOCKROOMS. ANYTHING COMING FROM CHINA SHOULD BE SENT BACK. OOPS SORRY IF THAT PUTS THEM OUT OF BUSINESS.
posted November 18, 2007 at 7:26 pm
Walmart isn’t the only chain of stores that buy from China, and we’d all have to send half the stuff in our homes back to China, also. Poor China and Walmart, pick, pick. All of my generation lived with lead on our toys paint, on the walls, on our cribs, and guess what we didn’t seem to chew on these items back then, had parents that watched us I guess.