Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

Death Penalty Foes Rejoice After NJ Vote

posted by nsymmonds | 11:48am Friday December 14, 2007

Associated Press – December 14, 2007
TRENTON, N.J. – With New Jersey poised to become the first state in four decades to abolish the death penalty, opponents of the practice declared a historic victory and hoped other states would follow suit.
The Assembly voted 44-36 on Thursday to approve the legislation, which passed the Senate on Monday by a 21-16 vote. Gov. Jon S. Corzine said he will sign it within a week.
Supporters hoped New Jersey’s move would start a wave of similar legislation. Thirty-seven states have the death penalty, according to the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center.
“New Jersey stands to embolden lawmakers who were as fearful of eliminating capital punishment as they were of keeping it,” said Larry Cox, executive director of Amnesty International USA. “This is a harbinger of things to come.”
Bills to abolish the death penalty were recently approved by a Colorado House committee, the Montana Senate and the New Mexico House. But none have advanced further.
The nation’s most recent execution was Sept. 25 in Texas. Since then, executions have been delayed pending a U.S. Supreme Court decision on whether execution by lethal injection violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
New Jersey reinstated the death penalty in 1982, six years after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed states to resume executions, but nobody has been executed in the Garden State since 1963.
New Jersey has been barred from executing anyone under a 2004 court ruling that declared invalid the state’s lethal injection procedures.
A special state commission found in January that the death penalty was a more expensive sentence than life in prison, hasn’t deterred murder, and could kill innocent people.
The measure would spare eight men on the state’s death row, including Jesse Timmendequas, a sex offender who murdered 7-year-old Megan Kanka in 1994.
The case inspired Megan’s Law, which requires law enforcement agencies to notify the public about convicted sex offenders living in their communities.
“There is no doubt whatsoever that those criminals now sitting on death row are guilty,” said Assemblyman Richard Merkt, a Republican. “Yet their lives are being spared in the name of justice. Tell me then, where is the justice for Megan Kanka and her family?”
Corzine said life in prison without parole offers a more certain outcome than death penalty sentences that come with years of appeals.
“This is an issue of conscience and the responsible administration of justice,” he said.
The bill gives the state’s death row inmates 60 days to decide whether to waive appeals and be sentenced to life in prison without parole. If such a motion isn’t made, the inmates would remain under the death sentence but would likely never be executed.
Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Previous Posts

Did Obama mean to pick a fight with America’s two largest denominations?
In an election year of all times, why would President Barack Obama choose to infuriate both America’s Catholics and Southern Baptists? “It seems that Obama, in a classic act of hubris, has created the means of his own destruction,” writes conservative commentator J.R. Dunn in the American T

posted 4:42:46pm Feb. 13, 2012 | read full post »

Did Rastafarian spokesman Bob Marley become a Christian on his deathbed?
Three decades after the death of legendary Jamaican musician Bob Marley, an intriguing story is circulating. “What most people don't know, and many try to cover up, is the fact that Bob Marley converted to Christianity in 1980,” proclaims an article that has appeared on a number of websites.

posted 4:52:03pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »

Are U.S. colleges hostile to Christian students?
Are Christian kids on U.S. college campuses facing open hostility and discrimination because of their faith? Supreme Court Justice Justice Samuel Alito seems to think so. So does U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Daniel Ripple – and human rights attorneys Gregory Baylor and Jordan Lorenc

posted 12:18:26pm Feb. 09, 2012 | read full post »

Building a Temple to Atheism
When I say temple, you think religious place of worship right?  When I say atheist, you think one that believes there is no God.  Stay with me now, when I say religion, don’t you think about the worship of God?  Before this blog becomes a full blown say what you are thinking game, let me get to

posted 5:49:11pm Feb. 03, 2012 | read full post »

Romney Nabs Second Primary Victory in Florida
"I stand ready to lead this party and to lead our nation.  My leadership will end the Obama era and begin a new era of American prosperity," Romney said in his victory speech in Tampa Tuesday night.  Romney who won all 50 of Florida’s convention delegates is the only Republican candidate to have

posted 5:15:58pm Feb. 02, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
Thelemite

posted December 14, 2007 at 12:50 pm


Whether or not the state is competent enough to make the call is one issue, but some people do deserve to die for their crimes.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted December 14, 2007 at 1:49 pm


There are still, IMO, crimes so horrible that the convicted (without any doubt, and that is much more certain with DNA) man or woman doesn’t deserve to be housed (even without possibility of parole)for the rest of their life. I think that the option should still be on the table if necessary. Obviously not to be used without due consideration.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted December 14, 2007 at 1:57 pm


And so civilization takes one more small step forward. Blessings on the legislature and governor of New Jersey. Proof that grace comes from the least expected places.
Of course, now the hard part comes. They have to discover and implement new, more creative and constructive ways to deal with perpetrators of heinous crimes.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted December 14, 2007 at 6:53 pm


There’s plenty of grace in N.J. jestrfyl, lots of compassion for people, and religions of all kinds. I’m with the ladies above, there are some crimes that only the death sentence would be right for.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted December 14, 2007 at 9:06 pm


“the death penalty was a more expensive sentence than life in prison, hasn’t deterred murder, and could kill innocent people.”
That says it all.
And while I might want someone to be executed for a heinous crime I don’t claim to be capable of fairly determining who should and who should not be executed and I don’t think anyone else is, either.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted December 15, 2007 at 11:00 am


I cannot ask someone else to do what I would not do myself. I could not flip the switch or press the injector. Therefore, I believe there must be other, better ways to deal with the problem. There are so many things people do on our behalf that I would not do myself. But I hire them, support and encourage them. Waging wars, killing murderers, and defrauding nations are not something I would support if I had a choice.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted December 15, 2007 at 1:47 pm


God made us all different, he did not make paperdolls. We all think differently because our experiences in life teach us different truths. We all have different talents, professions, jobs, genetic disparities; we all need each other and have to have faith in each other and the jobs that life asks us to perform. We should be able to discuss, debate, and try different viewpoints, but to say we wouldn’t execute, wage war, or anything else because someone else has, does not make us right when we aren’t them.



report abuse
 

RiderPsych

posted December 29, 2007 at 11:28 pm


I pray that God will forgive me for my failings of feelings and forgiveness; but there are people in our midst that, for whatever reasons or circumstances, have failed to acquire or have lost a connection with humanity. And as such, a society, for its greater good, must remove them. I know that statement basically rationalizes and valuates human life, and I am lessoned for making it. None the less, a society, for its preservation, must say and make known to its people that certain acts and actions are egregious and grave, and will not be accepted. It’s not a matter of society exacting its pound of flesh. It’s a matter of society saying there is no acceptable excuse for what you’ve done.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.