Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

Financial Strain a Factor in Abortions

posted by nsymmonds | 2:27pm Friday January 18, 2008

Associated Press – January 18, 2008
NEW YORK – In American pop culture, the face of abortion is often a frightened teenager, nervously choosing to terminate an unexpected pregnancy. The numbers tell a far more complex story in which financial stress can play a pivotal role.
Half of the roughly 1.2 million U.S. women who have abortions each year are 25 or older. Only about 17 percent are teens. About 60 percent have given birth to least one child prior to getting an abortion.
A disproportionately high number are black or Hispanic. And regardless of race, high abortion rates are linked to hard times.
“It doesn’t just happen to young people, it doesn’t necessarily have to do with irresponsibility,” said Miriam Inocencio, president of Planned Parenthood of Rhode Island. “Women face years and years of reproductive life after they’ve completed their families, and they’re at risk of an unintended pregnancy that can create an economic strain.”
Activists on both sides of the abortion debate will soon be marking the 35th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision, which established a nationwide right to abortion.
In recent years, the number of abortions has fallen; the 1.2 million tallied for 2005 was down 8 percent from 2000, and the per-capita abortion rate was the lowest since 1974. But overall, since the Roe ruling on Jan. 22, 1973, there have been roughly 50 million abortions in the United States, and more than one-third of adult women are estimated to have had at least one.
Who are these women?
Much of the public debate focuses on teens, as evidenced by the constant wrangling over parental notification laws and movies like the current hit “Juno,” in which the pregnant heroine heads to an abortion clinic, then decides to have the baby.
In fact, the women come from virtually every demographic sector. But year after year the statistics reveal that black women and economically struggling women – who have above-average rates of unintended pregnancies – are far more likely than others to have abortions. About 13 percent of American women are black, yet new figures from the Centers for Disease Control show they account for 35 percent of the abortions.
Black anti-abortion activists depict this phenomenon in dire terms – “genocide” and “holocaust,” for example. But often the women getting the abortions say they act in the interests of children they already have.
“It wasn’t a hard decision for me to make, because I knew where I wanted to go in my life – I’ve never regretted it,” said Kimberly Mathias, 28, an African-American single mother from Missouri.
She had an abortion at 19, when she already raising a 2-year-old son.
“It wasn’t hard to realize I didn’t want another child at that time,” Mathias said. “I was trying to take care of the one I had, and going to college and working at the same time.”
She was able to graduate, now has an insurance job, and – still a single mother – has a 3-year-old son as well as her first-born, now 11.
By contrast, Alveda King, a niece of Martin Luther King Jr., calls herself a “reformed murderer” for undergoing two abortions when she was young.
Now an outspoken anti-abortion campaigner, King says the best way to reduce abortions among black women is to dissuade more of them from premarital sex.
“We give free sex education, free condoms, free birth control,” she complained. “That’s almost like permission to have free sex, and the higher the rate of sexual activity, the higher the rate of unintended pregnancy.”
Anti-abortion activist Day Gardner of the National Black Pro-Life Union says many blacks are unaware of their community’s high abortion rate.
“We don’t talk about it,” Gardner said. “It’s a silent killer among us.”
She contends that abortion-rights supporters tempt black women into abortion by suggesting they can’t afford to raise the child. But Gardner also acknowledges that some black women make this argument on their own.
“We had the whole civil rights movement – now we’re in a place where we’re moving further toward equality,” Gardner said. “So women think, ‘For once, I can see the American dream. I can have the house and the job, but it would postpone it to have another child. I can’t afford to take time off.’”
Dr. Vanessa Cullins, a black physician who is Planned Parenthood’s national vice president for medical affairs, said the allegations of “black genocide” do not help women meet day-to-day challenges.
“These actions take attention away from medically proven ways to reduce unintended pregnancy – comprehensive sex education, affordable birth control, and open and honest conversations about relationships,” she said
Looking beyond racial dividing lines, Cullins views the right to abortion as an important component in the ability of all American women to determine the right size for their family.
“Groups that become assimilated in U.S. culture and experience economic opportunities naturally decide to limit family size, because they want to take part in the American dream,” she said. “If you’re a single mother, achieving the dream is all the harder, so it makes sense to limit family size so you can shower as much support as you can on the children you have.”
Georgette Forney, who had an abortion when she was 16 and is now an anti-abortion campaigner leading Anglicans for Life, says she often sees economic pressures triggering abortions, even in middle-class families.
“In one situation, the husband was adamant that they were on track to pay for their two sons’ college education, and a third child would throw off his whole calculation,” Forney recounted. “So that baby was aborted and that woman was devastated. It was a five-year process to recover.”
Forney said she also encountered a single mother who was worried she might lose custody of her daughter in light of a suit by the biological father. The woman then became pregnant, Forney said, and had an abortion in violation of her own beliefs because she feared having a second child would jeopardize prospects for keeping her daughter.
“We’ve begun to depend on abortions,” Forney said. “We feel we have to choose between our unborn child and our born children.”
Martha Girard, on the other hand, says she’s appalled by the notion that women should lose the right to choose.
A hospital ultrasound technician from Pleasant Prairie, Wis., and a mother of three, Girard had an abortion two years ago, at the age of 44, when she mistakenly thought she was too old to get pregnant.
Having been through three difficult pregnancies previously, and coping with a mentally disabled eldest son, she felt abortion was the prudent choice.
“I knew that this pregnancy would end up badly – I could feel it – and we’ve already got enough problems with the mentally ill son,” Girard said.
“I was very sad and depressed the first week,” she added. “But because it’s hard on you emotionally and some women regret it, that doesn’t mean it’s wrong, that someone else should decide for you.”
The Journal of Family Issues published a report earlier this month asserting that women often choose abortion because of their wish to be good parents.
That means women who have no children want the conditions to be right when they do, and women who already are mothers want to care responsibly for their existing children, said the lead author, Rachel Jones, a researcher with the Guttmacher Institute.
“These women believed that it was more responsible to terminate a pregnancy than to have a child whose health and welfare could be in question,” Jones said.
Even among many abortion opponents, the Guttmacher Institute – which supports abortion rights – is considered the nation’s best source of abortion statistics.
Federal statistics do not include California, the most populous state, because its government does not provide data. But Guttmacher researchers surveyed abortion providers there as well as in other states to produce the latest national estimate of 1.2 million abortions in 2005. That’s down from a peak of 1.6 million in 1990 but still represents more than 20 percent of all pregnancies.
One of the Guttmacher’s top researchers, Stanley Henshaw, said the recent drop may disguise the fact abortion rates remain relatively high for black and Hispanic women. He believes the most effective countermeasure would be wider availability of contraceptives such as intrauterine device, or IUDs, that don’t require attention as frequently as condoms or birth-control pills.
Though abortion is commonplace across the country, urban areas have far higher rates than rural areas where access to abortion providers can be difficult.
New York, New Jersey, California, Delaware, Nevada, Maryland and Florida had the highest abortion rates in 2005, according to the new Guttmacher report released this week. Wyoming, Idaho, Kentucky, South Dakota and Mississippi had the lowest rates – the latter two states have just a single abortion clinic in operation.
Susan Hill, founder of the National Women’s Health Organization that runs the remaining Mississippi clinic, says the statistics may not fully reflect a subgroup of relatively affluent women who obtain unreported abortions through their private doctors.
“In Mississippi, it’s the poor women who don’t have access to that who have to run through the maze of protesters screaming and yelling abuse,” Hill said. “Wealthier women can be more creative about their alternatives.”
According to Guttmacher data, the abortion rate among women living below the federal poverty level is more than four times higher that among women from middle-income and affluent households.
An increasing number of women avoid surgery by using the RU-486 abortion pill or other early medication – these now account for about 13 percent of all abortions.
Of all U.S. women getting abortions, about 54 percent are doing so for the first time, while one-fifth have had at least two previous abortions. Of those over 20, the majority have attended college. Almost a third have been married at some point. About 60 percent have at least one child; one-third have two or more.
“I don’t think most people understand that these are women who have families, who are making a very serious decision about their reproductive health,” said Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America. “The stereotype is that the decision is made lightly. It is not.”
On the Net:
Abortion statistics: http://www.guttmacher.org/
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed



Previous Posts

Did Rastafarian spokesman Bob Marley become a Christian on his deathbed?
Three decades after the death of legendary Jamaican musician Bob Marley, an intriguing story is circulating. “What most people don't know, and many try to cover up, is the fact that Bob Marley converted to Christianity in 1980,” proclaims an article that has appeared on a number of websites.

posted 4:52:03pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »

Are U.S. colleges hostile to Christian students?
Are Christian kids on U.S. college campuses facing open hostility and discrimination because of their faith? Supreme Court Justice Justice Samuel Alito seems to think so. So does U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Daniel Ripple – and human rights attorneys Gregory Baylor and Jordan Lorenc

posted 12:18:26pm Feb. 09, 2012 | read full post »

Building a Temple to Atheism
When I say temple, you think religious place of worship right?  When I say atheist, you think one that believes there is no God.  Stay with me now, when I say religion, don’t you think about the worship of God?  Before this blog becomes a full blown say what you are thinking game, let me get to

posted 5:49:11pm Feb. 03, 2012 | read full post »

Romney Nabs Second Primary Victory in Florida
"I stand ready to lead this party and to lead our nation.  My leadership will end the Obama era and begin a new era of American prosperity," Romney said in his victory speech in Tampa Tuesday night.  Romney who won all 50 of Florida’s convention delegates is the only Republican candidate to have

posted 5:15:58pm Feb. 02, 2012 | read full post »

Science Whiz Gets a New Home
17 year-old Samantha Garvey made national headlines when she was selected as an Intel Science Talent Search semi-finalist—one of 300 across the country vying for the top prize, a $100,000 science scholarship.  It was Garvey’s home life that tugged at the heartstrings of people all over the coun

posted 11:53:07am Jan. 30, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(15)
post a comment
jestrfyl

posted January 18, 2008 at 6:30 pm


This is one of the better articles I have read on this subject.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted January 18, 2008 at 7:37 pm


As I’ve said before, often families need abortions.
And the anti-abortionist who wanted to take away birth control shows how radical a lot of these anti-abortionists are. They won’t usually say so but many of them do, in fact, want to take away access to birth control and take us back to the 1950′s.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted January 18, 2008 at 7:48 pm


This certainly was an informative article on the subject. It points out some of the many reasons why abortions are done. No matter what the circumstances which force a woman to have a termination, at least they are still legal in this country and that should not change. Certainly prevention of pregnancy should be a priority, but even with the best of methods, pregnancy can result. I think it was interesting that many abortions are performed on women 25 and older…not exactly kids. Obviously some women regret their decision, but some don’t.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted January 18, 2008 at 9:30 pm


I’ve heard all these reasons for why women choose abortions, and know a few more not mentioned. Any senior person would say the same. The fact remains the same, Planned Parenthood is best. The rest of the U.S. should stay out of peoples personal business, mind their own and if they can’t take care of their own business find professional help for themselves. We are not living in a Religious Commune, we’re different and have different view points on everything.



report abuse
 

Anonymous

posted January 19, 2008 at 1:34 am


“It doesn’t just happen to young people, it doesn’t necessarily have to do with irresponsibility,” said Miriam Inocencio, president of Planned Parenthood of Rhode Island.
_________________________________________________________________
What an idiotic statement above. Of course it’s irresponsibility. If you don’t want to have a child, then don’t have sex. It’s that simple.
Using birth control doesn’t make it responsible–you can still get pregnant. Abstain if you don’t want a child.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted January 19, 2008 at 8:17 am


“If you don’t want to have a child, then don’t have sex. It’s that simple.” … “Abstain if you don’t want a child.”
Well, in what’s supposed to pass for sex education in far too much of the US they’ve been teaching abstinence and, guess what, it doesn’t work very well. If abstinence is your only defense against pregnancy you’d better live in a nunnery or be low on hormones or be unusually strong willed. And none of those apply to a lot of people.
So, I have to agree in a way, what an idiotic statement above. It’s irresponsible to try to deny people means to control their pregnancies, and abstinence is, for a lot of people, not an effective or practical means.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted January 19, 2008 at 11:40 am


Has anyone when else read the economics book (I forget the title but it is in its umpteenth printing and is about crazy econ. theories) that has a similar theory about abortions, crime, and economics. I think this pice is part of a proof to what the authors of the book were proposing. As David Letterman used to say, “Things that make you go ‘hmmm’”.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted January 19, 2008 at 2:22 pm


mystery poster: “If you don’t want to have a child,then don’t have sex. It’s that simple.”
Are these supposed to be “words of wisdom?” I have known very responsible, MARRIED couples who have an unplanned child. Are they supposed to not have sex, even though married, if they don’t want a child? The best of contraceptives don’t always work. Even vasectomies and a woman getting her tubes tied isn’t always successful.
And if not married, no sex? Right, and you don’t need food either, because you might be irresponsible, eat too much and become overweight?
Abstinence is perfect if one has no interest in either gender sexually. It doesn’t work to try and teach it as the only method of birth control. Sex ed. should give all the means of not only preventing pregnancy, but STDS as well.
However, terminations are necessary for some, and should always be legal, for the safty of the woman, who after careful consideration, decides it is necessary.



report abuse
 

lonevoice

posted January 19, 2008 at 7:59 pm


sex is one of the strongest drives of a human, we all need that sweet release, we all have to live with our decisions right or wrong, I think it would be gut wretching for a woman to make the choice to abort or not to abort, may Creator God be with every woman in her decision and loved ones around her to help her regardless of which direction she takes for most of life is messy and not clean and neat



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted January 19, 2008 at 11:37 pm


“If you don’t want to have a child,then don’t have sex. It’s that simple.”
O Mystery Poster of above quote,
You might as well tell an asthmatic that if you don’t want to wheeze don’t breathe! Sex is a biological function. Certainly we have some control over our impulses – I can control my breathing, too – to a limited degree. But that is a bit extreme. There is more to sex than procreation! It is a most intimate form of communication and affection. If it works for you, swell (pun intended). But don;t expect advice like that to prevent any other swelling.



report abuse
 

Joey

posted January 20, 2008 at 2:34 pm


Two more things to add to my “List of Major Differences Between Religious Conservatives and Religious Liberals:”
1.) As a general rule, the religiously conservative have more kids. To many, in fact, I think the idea of being married and not wanting to have kids (or wanting a limited number) is kind of like eating so that you can taste things, but not so it can fill you up—basically, half the point is gone. This may have been the anonymous poster’s mistake, and why (s)he did not take into account the idea of married people. (Though to be fair, married people can practice celibacy too—let’s face it, most of them do anyway. :-)
2.) The idea that people “have some control over our impulses…to a limited degree.” Frankly a very dehumanizing concept to me.
God bless.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted January 20, 2008 at 4:32 pm


‘The idea that people “have some control over our impulses…to a limited degree.” Frankly a very dehumanizing concept to me.’
Go to any car dealership, any grocery store desert aisle, any bar, any KFC, any emergency room, any court room, any confessional, … and spend a little time and you’ll find everyone gives in to an impulse sometime or other, some of us more than others. It’s part of being human.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted January 20, 2008 at 6:28 pm


All in all, sex is here to stay, and if some of that turns out to cause a pregnancy that isn’t wanted or planned, then the ability to either take the morning after pill or RU486, or have a safe termination should be there for women that need them. Impulse is, as said above, part of being human.



report abuse
 

Anonymous

posted January 21, 2008 at 9:22 pm


Looking beyond racial dividing lines, Cullins views the right to abortion as an important component in the ability of all American women to determine the right size for their family.
What about the men?! What if they want to keep the children? It would not be fair to the woman who wants the abortion, but to deny him the right to the offspring that is as just as his responsibility is just as sexist!!
Since when do we have a “right” to determine an unborn’s right to life? Since when has sexuality become synonymous with “liberty”? I am not saying these are liberal ideas…I am saying these are pathetic, misguided, dangerous disillusions.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted January 22, 2008 at 10:47 am


mystery poster:
“What about men?! What if they want to keep the children?”
The man doesn’t carry the unwanted/unplanned child for 9 months and then gives birth to it. Is he going to raise it too, if the woman doesn’t want it? Or would he end up abusing it, perhaps killing it, as has happened many times to unwanted children. A woman has to do what she has to do, and the decision isn’t easy, but sometimes necessary. Yes, a man is responsible also, but as I said, he doesn’t have to carry it for 9 months and give birth.
“Since when do we have a “right” to determine an unborn’s right to life?”
Since time began. Do you really think terminations started recently?
“Since when has sexuality become synonymous with “liberty”? Again, since time began. It just wasn’t talked about, it just happened.
“….I am saying these are pathetic, misguided, dangerous disillusions”. In your opinion



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.