Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

Sudanese Army Fires at U.N. Convoy in Darfur

posted by akornfeld | 2:44pm Tuesday January 8, 2008

Associated Press
Khartoum, Sudan – The Sudanese army shot at a “clearly marked” U.N. convoy in war-torn Darfur, critically wounding a driver, in the first attack against the peacekeepers since their mission began this month, the United Nations said Tuesday.
The U.N. condemned the attack, which occurred late Monday, and said it had protested to the Sudanese government that “a clearly marked (U.N.) supplies convoy was attacked by elements of the Sudanese Armed Forces while on its way from Um Baru to Tine in West Darfur.”
A Sudanese contracting driver was hit by seven bullets, a fuel tanker truck destroyed and an armored personnel carrier damaged in the attack, the U.N. said in its statement.
The South African peacekeepers protecting the convoy did not return fire, and the U.N. suffered no casualties.
“The secretary general condemns this attack in the strongest possible terms and stresses that … the government of Sudan has to provide unequivocal guarantees that there will be no recurrence of such activities by its forces,” the U.N. statement said.
There was no immediate comment by the Sudanese government.
A U.N. peacekeeper in Darfur earlier told AP that the Sudanese army apparently mistook the U.N. troops for Darfur rebels who also operate in this volatile area near the border with Chad.
“It was night time, it seems the (Sudanese) soldiers lost their calm,” the peacekeeper said.
A senior official with the U.N. mission, known as UNAMID, said the Sudanese soldiers stopped shooting after 10 minutes and let the peacekeepers go. Both the peacekeeper and the official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the incident with the media.
United Nations vehicles are painted white and marked with the U.N. logo to signal their neutrality. It was unclear how the Sudanese army could have mistaken them for rebels, who usually drive camouflaged pickup trucks and don’t have armored vehicles.
Head of mission Rodolphe Adada consulted with Sudan’s Foreign Ministry Tuesday afternoon and both sides have “agreed to launch an urgent investigation into the incident,” UNAMID spokesman Noureddine Mezni told The Associated Press.
“The is the first time UNAMID is attacked, and we hope it will be the last,” Mezni said. “We are in Darfur to bring peace, not to fight.”
The U.N. mission is the latest international attempt to quell the violence in Darfur, where more than 200,000 people have died and 2.5 million have fled to refugee camps in nearly five years of fighting between the Sudanese government and local rebels.
A previous African Union force of around 7,000 troops was unable the end the chaos and suffered dozens of casualties.
The new joint force currently stands at about 9,000 troops and police and is supposed to grow to 26,000. But the deployment is far behind schedule and Western countries have so far failed to commit heavy fighting equipment such as helicopters.
Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir had long opposed any U.N. peacekeeping force in Darfur. Under heavy international pressure, he relented in June, agreeing to the hybrid U.N.-AU force. But U.N. officials say his government has thrown up numerous bureaucratic obstacles to the deployment and has tried to limit its powers.
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Previous Posts

Did Rastafarian spokesman Bob Marley become a Christian on his deathbed?
Three decades after the death of legendary Jamaican musician Bob Marley, an intriguing story is circulating. “What most people don't know, and many try to cover up, is the fact that Bob Marley converted to Christianity in 1980,” proclaims an article that has appeared on a number of websites.

posted 4:52:03pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »

Are U.S. colleges hostile to Christian students?
Are Christian kids on U.S. college campuses facing open hostility and discrimination because of their faith? Supreme Court Justice Justice Samuel Alito seems to think so. So does U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Daniel Ripple – and human rights attorneys Gregory Baylor and Jordan Lorenc

posted 12:18:26pm Feb. 09, 2012 | read full post »

Building a Temple to Atheism
When I say temple, you think religious place of worship right?  When I say atheist, you think one that believes there is no God.  Stay with me now, when I say religion, don’t you think about the worship of God?  Before this blog becomes a full blown say what you are thinking game, let me get to

posted 5:49:11pm Feb. 03, 2012 | read full post »

Romney Nabs Second Primary Victory in Florida
"I stand ready to lead this party and to lead our nation.  My leadership will end the Obama era and begin a new era of American prosperity," Romney said in his victory speech in Tampa Tuesday night.  Romney who won all 50 of Florida’s convention delegates is the only Republican candidate to have

posted 5:15:58pm Feb. 02, 2012 | read full post »

Science Whiz Gets a New Home
17 year-old Samantha Garvey made national headlines when she was selected as an Intel Science Talent Search semi-finalist—one of 300 across the country vying for the top prize, a $100,000 science scholarship.  It was Garvey’s home life that tugged at the heartstrings of people all over the coun

posted 11:53:07am Jan. 30, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(2)
post a comment
jestrfyl

posted January 8, 2008 at 3:27 pm


I recall learning that one of the ways the (American) Colonial milita succeeded against the British was that the militia did not follow any of the expected rules for engagement. They broke the rules and fired from behind objects, ran for cover, and used subterfuge and sabotage to their advantage.
So why do we expect some other indiginous forces to play by the rules of engagement? The reality of war is there are no rules – none. All moral codes are broken, all Laws are violated, and any thought of decency is vacated. If we truly want to change the situation in Sudan we too must break some rules. That may include using force and powerful presence to take a stand. But more, we have to be willing to accept the cost of cutting off the supplies that allow the insurgents and indiginous warlords to continue. We have the technology, we have the idealism, we have the people ready to help. They simply need supplies, protection, and support.
Enuff whining! Let’s DO something!



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted January 8, 2008 at 6:53 pm


I doubt that the attack was because of mistaken idenity of the white truck!
Why would the Sudanese president have a problem with peacekeepers in his country? Because the peace keepers will verify what is happening in the Sudan!



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.