Associated Press – February 13, 2008
COPENHAGEN, Denmark – Leading Danish newspapers reprinted cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad in a gesture of solidarity Wednesday after police revealed a plot to kill the creator of the caricature that sparked deadly riots across the Muslim world.
Danish Muslims said they would seek to avoid a repeat of the violence two years ago – but with a rightwing Dutch lawmaker planning to air a movie that condemns Islam as fascist, Europe pondered the possibility of a new cycle of ethnic and religious turmoil.
“I just don’t want go through this again,” said Mohammed Shafiq, of the Ramadhan Foundation, a Muslim educational group in London. Shafiq said he had already written a protest letter to the Danish ambassador in London.
Other Muslim groups echoed his sentiments, saying they believed the Danish papers were seeking, unnecessarily, to rekindle the fiery debate over free speech and Islam that engulfed Europe during the cartoon uproar in 2006.
Some experts said that discussion never went away – it just drifted off the editorial pages of Europe’s dailies.
“This conflict will remain as long as there are people who believe religion should have a greater role in society,” said Magnus Norell, a Middle East expert at the Swedish Defense Research Agency.
More than a dozen papers in Denmark reprinted what was arguably the most controversial of the 12 Muhammad cartoons that enraged Muslims in early 2006 when they appeared in a range of Western newspapers.
The drawing, by newspaper cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, depicts Islam’s prophet wearing a turban shaped like a bomb with a lit fuse.
The papers said they wanted to show their firm commitment to freedom of speech after Tuesday’s arrest in western Denmark of three people accused of plotting to kill Westergaard.
“We are doing this to document what is at stake in this case, and to unambiguously back and support the freedom of speech that we as a newspaper will always defend,” said the Copenhagen-based Berlingske Tidende.
Islamic law generally opposes any depiction of the prophet, even favorable, for fear it could lead to idolatry.
At least three European newspapers – in Sweden, the Netherlands and Spain – also reprinted the cartoon as part of their coverage of the Danish arrests.
The debate had already resurfaced recently in the Netherlands with right-wing lawmaker Geert Wilders’ plans to make an anti-Quran film portraying the religion as fascist and prone to inciting violence against women and homosexuals.
In Denmark, all eyes turned toward the Islamic Faith Community, a network of Muslim groups that many Danes say provoked the riots of 2006 by embarking on a Middle East tour seeking support for their fight against the paper that first published the cartoons, Jyllands-Posten.
Group spokesman Kasem Ahmad said even though printing the cartoons “was like a knife in our hearts,” the group would not take any action this time.
“We have no plans to travel abroad or export this problem,” he told reporters at a mosque in Copenhagen. “Now we have decided to neglect and ignore any possible provocation.”
In January and February of 2006, angry mobs burned the Danish flag and attacked Danish and other Western embassies in Muslim countries including Syria, Iran and Lebanon. Danish products were boycotted by many Muslim consumers. Protesters were killed in Libya and Afghanistan.
The Danish Foreign Ministry said its diplomatic missions worldwide were monitoring the situation for any signs of unrest related to the cartoon. It had not observed any strong reactions Wednesday, said Uffe Wolffhechel of the ministry’s consular department.
In Egypt, one observer said there was no guarantee that violence would not break out again – and suggested Europe might be a possible stage.
“I’m against any violent reaction, but how can you control or expect to control the 15-20 million Muslims living in Europe, how can you prevent a Muslim youth there not to try to take revenge while his religion and Prophet are being insulted?” said Fahmi Howeidy, a prominent Egyptian Islamic writer.
Other experts said they didn’t expect the resurgence of Westergaard’s cartoon to provoke massive protests this time, partly because many of the Danish imams that solicited support from the Mideast in 2006 were no longer around.
“Many have learned lessons of what happened two years ago. Some of the key players in Denmark have disappeared, they are either dead, have left the country or have been demoted,” said Helle Lykke Nielsen, of the Center for Contemporary Middle East Studies at the University of Southern Denmark.
The decision by the Danish papers to reprint Westergaard’s cartoon came in response to Tuesday’s news that intelligence police had arrested two Tunisians and a Danish citizen of Moroccan origin for plotting to kill Westergaard.
The Danish suspect was released Tuesday after questioning, his lawyer, Henning Lyngsbo, said. He added that “It doesn’t seem that the evidence is very strong.”
Intelligence service chief Jakob Scharf had indicated the man could still face charges of violating a Danish terror law. The two Tunisians are to be expelled from Denmark because they are considered threats to national security, Scharf said.
Some critics claimed the Danish papers were using the arrests as an excuse to provoke Muslims.
The British Muslim Initiative, a group devoted to fighting what it calls Islamophobia worldwide, said the republication showed the West’s double standards.
“It shows the apparent disregard to Islam and Muslims in some of these liberal society,” said Ihtisham Hibatullah, the group’s spokesman.
“Every time they say: ‘We have the right to offend,’ and then they tell you don’t have the right to be offended.”
Associated Press Writers Raphael Satter in London and Karl Ritter in Stockholm, Sweden, and Nadia Abou el-Magd in Cairo contributed to this report.
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



posted February 13, 2008 at 8:12 pm
The right to print, in this case, reprint,is called “freedom of the press”. The whole world isn’t Muslim, and just because the Muslim’s don’t want their special person depicted doesn’t mean that non-Muslims can’t depict the prophet. The Muslims need to get over it, IMO.
posted February 13, 2008 at 9:42 pm
I’m all for freedom of speech; it’s vital. I understand the papers’ desire to print those cartoons and were I there I might have done so to. The Muslims seem to be showing more maturity and I applaud them. Now let’s just let it die down.
posted February 14, 2008 at 12:00 am
The first time is from ignorance, but the second time is for attention. Sure, we who value and adore freedom of the press are scandalized that anyone would be offended by a mere cartoon. But to rub this in the face of people who have barely forgotten the first incident is simple insolence. This was not their most thought through step.
posted February 14, 2008 at 10:11 am
You know the Christians would poop a chicken if someone dare insulted their prophet. While I do agree it shouldn’t be banned, freedom of the press and all that, I think it is cruel, ignorant, and in poor taste. How would Pagans Christians or Jews like their religious icons insulted like that?
posted February 14, 2008 at 12:18 pm
I got from this article that they printed the cartoon again because after two yrs. several Muslim men were caught about to kill the cartoonist. They did it to show that Danish are free people, the Swedes and Spanish too, and have freedom of the press. It was to show bullies, and murderers that they won’t be controlled by anyone trying to tell them what they can print and what they can’t print. There are many other things on earth that are more important then being thought unmannerly, etc. A silly cartoon can’t bite, can’t kill, and a good laugh won’t hurt anyone, including the indignent people the cartoon represents.
posted February 14, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Phoenix:
Which god or goddess would a cartoon depict? Would I be insulted? No. Cartoons are just that….and many times tell the truth about the subject…or poke fun at the subject. As a former Christian…same…if someone wanted to cartoon Jesus…whatever…it is as Henrietta said…it can’t bite, kill and makes for a good laugh. Or it could make people stop and think…that too is good.
As I said above…in this case the Muslims need to “get over it.”
posted February 14, 2008 at 2:40 pm
I want to promote a comic strip I discovered recently. It is called “Mythtickle” and it is about the interaction of many gods from many cultures. It can be found at gocomics.com (I think the address is something like that), or simply “google”, “mythtickle”. These are good strips and worthy of attnetion. They are well drawn, funny without being caustic, and I think the artist could us a boost from a community like B’net. Like everything, especially when it is new, not every strip is a winner. But I have already copied several for use with groups in our church. The overall effect of the strip is quie positive and I think he picks up some of what Tom Waterson set down when he retired “Calvin & Hobbes.”
Check it out!!
posted February 14, 2008 at 6:00 pm
Pagansister,
I have been sensored in some Pagan circles, and even insulted, for merely, and kindly, pointing out that there is no archeological evidence that “Wicca is the oldest religon.” So it does seem us Pagans would silence our own critics, even the ones that are Pagan too. While it is true that a cartoon cannot hurt, I think one should be respectful of others beliefs, a tone most here seem to miss. And Henrietta22, YOUR people can be JUST as indignent as radical Muslims, for there are radical Christians, Pagans, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, etc. As the old saying goes, “Do NOT ignore the log in your eye to point out the splinter in mine.”
posted February 14, 2008 at 6:08 pm
“I think one should be respectful of others beliefs, a tone most here seem to miss.”
Agreed, as long as the holders of those beliefs don’t try to interfere in the lives of others. When a significant number of those believers do, and especially when they become successful, those beliefs become very much fair game.
posted February 14, 2008 at 7:53 pm
Phoenix, no my people can’t be indignent about trivia. You probably meant some Christians can be bent out of shape, they don’t happen to be my people. I don’t line up all Muslims with the extremists in Denmark or anywhere else, just the ones that are creating trouble.
posted February 14, 2008 at 10:41 pm
Phoenix:
It is possible to comment on and disagree with a religion (or anything else) and still respect them and the folks that believe in them. I disagree with a lot of religions, but still have respect for them, even though I think they might be fantansy like. Actually many religions are like fairy tales…anyhow.
In the case of this cartoon and the Muslims, the cartoon made a political statement that in a lot of cases is true. It didn’t say that all Muslims were extremists…but enough are that the point was made.
And yes, all religions, have their extremists.
posted February 15, 2008 at 10:48 am
It’s good to see that while we may disagree about whether or not it was appropriate for them to reprint the cartoons, no one here has declared that they should not be allowed to do so.
posted March 5, 2008 at 10:03 am
Freedom doesnot mean that u should talk foolishly against the religion and the founders.Its like creating issue to hurt the souls of hundreds of thousands of Muslims