
Monday February 25, 2008
Hindus Thrive as Buddhists Struggle to Pass on the Faith
By Andrea Useem
2008 Religion News Service
(UNDATED) In a study that highlights the fluidity of religious affiliation in America today, Hindus stand out as the group with the most stable religious identity, while Buddhists struggle hardest to pass the faith from one generation to the next.
Ninety percent of Hindus marry within their own faith, and eight-in-ten Hindus who were raised Hindu remain so as adults, according to the U.S. Religious Landscape Survey, released Monday (Feb. 25) by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
In contrast, only 45 percent of Buddhists are married to another Buddhist, and only half of Buddhists who were raised in the faith remain Buddhists as adults.
The survey, based on interviews with 35,000 U.S. adults, helps put a face on two faiths imported from Asia that have long been hard to quantify. Numbers for both groups "should be viewed as minimum estimates," researchers wrote, because non-English-speaking immigrants may have been excluded.
The survey estimated there are 1.6 million American Buddhists (0.7 percent of the adult population). A majority (53 percent) are white, while one-third are Asian. Hindus, meanwhile, number about 900,000, or 0.4 percent of all adult Americans.
The fact that eight in 10 Hindus are foreign-born may help explain the high retention rates, said Vasudha Narayanan, a Hindu scholar at the University of Florida.
"Many (Hindu Americans) are from India, so they still feel ethnically different and have remained Hindu" and sought to marry fellow Hindus, she said.
But Narayanan said that stability won't last forever. "Already we are seeing members of the next generation, who are assimilated, marrying into other traditions," she said.
The study also revealed Hindu Americans have higher-than-average income and education levels as compared to other Americans. In addition, six in 10 Hindu are male, a pattern that reflects immigration trends, said Narayanan.
The Pew Forum data also do not capture the cultural influence of Hinduism in America, said Narayanan. "Many Americans practice religious yoga or mediate or believe in reincarnation or karma without explicitly calling themselves `Hindu."'
For Buddhists, the data show "convert Buddhist communities face a significant challenge in engaging their children and keeping them in the tradition," said Thomas Tweed, a professor of religious studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Many Buddhist converts "didn't really attempt to bring their children into Buddhism," added Robert Seager, a religious studies professor at Hamilton College in Clinton, N.Y. "They said, `I don't want to lay my trip on my kids."'
Immigrant Buddhists, who may have "stronger institutional commitments" than converts, were probably under-represented in the survey data, Seager said. He theorized, however, that retention may also be low among children born to waves of Vietnamese and Cambodian refugees who came to the United States a generation ago.
"With the Boomer population (of Buddhists) aging," Seager said, "I do worry about Buddhism in America evaporating with time."
Copyright 2008 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.




Add to Newsvine
Comments
"They said, `I don't want to lay my trip on my kids.'"
See, natural selection does not favor hippies. :-)
But really, I think that is the heart of the matter. Not to offend any serious practitioners here, but the majority of those white Buddhist coverts were not really that interested in Buddhism as a "serious" religion. For that matter Buddhism itself is kind of designed to be non-exclusive; most schools of Buddhism kind of designed themselves to be practiced syncretically with other traditions, which for something like this can be somewhat of a detriment. Hinduism, on the other hand, is very tradition-based, and the fact that you cannot really "convert" to Hinduism (or can you? I know some Westerners do take up Hindu practices...historically, with the caste system, conversion would have been kind of impossible, but is there some way now?) makes it stronger, at least in the short term. As the article mentions, Hinduism will likely face assimilation in time, but even then I predict it will be more viable than American Buddhism.
God bless.
Posted by: Joey | February 25, 2008 5:55 PM
"They said, `I don't want to lay my trip on my kids.'"
If only everyone felt that way.
Posted by: nnmns | February 25, 2008 8:38 PM
For those that chose not to lay their trip on the kids, good. Raised my kids in the UU church, and they were encouraged to find their own paths...and they have.
Posted by: pagansister | February 25, 2008 9:00 PM
As a WASP American male convert to Buddhism; I feel some of what we see in this report is part of a very old mainline tradition of rejecting the live of the householder, marrying and reaiseing children, in order to give more time and energy to study, continplation, meditation and enlightenment. Buddhism is a highly persomal spirituality and "not laying my trip on my children" is very inkeeping with that. I think what is needed is a Buddhist connection to American hertiage. There is a sense around the world that caucasians can not be true Buddhist because they didn'g grow in the Oriental tradition that surrounds it. This is not true and in fact Siddhartha Gautama was himslef a white mam. Also the Tocarians which were a caucasian ethic group from Western China were some of the most devoted early Buddhist were insturmental in spreading the religion to China.
What we need is a truly unique White American Buddhism drawing on the traditions of the Torcarians and various Western intellectuals.
Posted by: Steve Forney | February 27, 2008 10:58 AM
Post a Comment
Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?