Associated Press – March 31, 2008
LONDON – Some of England’s most sacred soil was disturbed Monday for the first time in more than four decades as archaeologists worked to solve the enduring riddle of Stonehenge: When and why was the prehistoric monument built?
The excavation project, set to last until April 11, is designed to unearth materials that can be used to establish a firm date for when the first mysterious set of bluestones was put in place at Stonehenge, one of Britain’s best known and least understood landmarks.
The World Heritage site, a favorite with visitors the world over, has become popular with Druids, neo-Pagans and New Agers who attach mystical significance to the strangely shaped circle of stones, but there remains great debate about the actual purpose of the structure.
The dig will be led by Timothy Darvill, a leading Stonehenge scholar from Bournemouth University, and Geoffrey Wainwright, president of the Society of Antiquaries. Both experts have worked to pinpoint the site in the Preseli Mountains in south Wales where the bluestones – the earliest of the large rocks erected at the site – came from. They will be able to compare the samples found in Wales to those at Stonehenge on the Salisbury Plain.
“The excavation will date the arrival of the bluestones following their 153-mile journey from Preseli to Salisbury Plain and contribute to our definition of the society which undertook such an ambitious project,” Wainright said. “We will be able to say not only why, but when the first stone monument was built.”
Scientists believe the bluestones were first put in place about 2600 B.C., but they concede the date is only an approximation at best. The original bluestones were removed about 200 years later and scientists hope to find bits of them embedded in the earth.
Darvill said the excavation marks the first opportunity to bring the power of modern scientific archaeology to bear on a problem that has taxed the minds of so many experts since medieval times: Why were the bluestones so important to have warranted bringing them from so far away?
The excavation goal is to find remnants of the original bluestones, or related materials, that can be subjected to modern radiocarbon dating techniques to establish a more precise timeline for the construction of Stonehenge, said Dave Batchelor, an archaeologist with English Heritage, which oversees the Stonehenge site.
“We have to find the material that will give us a good date,” he said. “That’s where the luck comes in. We could get an absolute blank or we could get something magnificent or we could get something in between.”
He said bluestones have an “inky, bluey, black” appearance and come from the Preseli Mountains in South Wales. About 6 feet tall, they are the smaller stones that make up part of the monument, alongside the larger sarsen stones, which are about twice as tall and were added later.
It is hoped that fixing the date of the start of construction with more precision will allow scientists to finally grasp how and why the monument was built. They also may learn more about how the stones were transported. Research shows the bluestones, weighing an estimated five tons apiece, may have been dragged from the mountains in south Wales to the sea, put on huge rafts and floated up the River Avon.
Archaeologists believe that before the bluestones were put in place, Stonehenge consisted of a circle of wooden posts and timbers built in approximately 3100 B.C.
The research that began Monday with the digging of a trench marks the first time ground inside the inner stone circle has been excavated since 1944. The area, revered as a powerful link to England’s pagan past, is so sensitive that Cabinet approval was needed before the work could begin.
Renee Fok, a spokeswoman with English Heritage, said the project was okayed only after experts were convinced of its potential value. She said the project represents “the logical next step” after the two professors located the source of the bluestones in Wales.
“It’s the culmination of their work, it makes sense to go back to the stone circle and get a date,” she said.
“We want to strike a balance. We want the best research, but we can’t just say go ahead and dig as you like, it’s a very fragile area. Even the Druids are happy with this project, we’ve spoken to them and they don’t object.”
She said tourists will be able to visit Stonehenge as usual and will also be able to watch live video coverage of the excavation in special tents at the site.
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



posted March 31, 2008 at 4:43 pm
It could be fascinating. I hope they find strong evidence from which they can reach defensible conclusions.
posted March 31, 2008 at 5:01 pm
I have been priveliged to be inside those stones…and to me they are sacred. They truly are magnificent. There is no way to put into words the feelings I had being there. There has always been a pull to them and after seeing them 3 times from the outer, roped off area, I finally was able to spend an hour inside.
I look forward to reading the results of the dig.
To brag a little,there is some proof that I am related (on my father’s side) to the family that owned Stonehenge before it was sold to the British government. In fact the family member who is directly related, a cousin of mine, is 91. She and I write to each other.
posted March 31, 2008 at 5:24 pm
So ps you may have had one of DeaconScott’s numinous experiences. It must have been pretty cool. Congratulations.
posted March 31, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Believe me, nnmns, it was beyond cool!
posted March 31, 2008 at 6:10 pm
pagansister,
I am envious beyond words. My wife went to Stonehenge in high school and (adolescent Philistine that she was) all she remembers is sunning herself on one of the horizontal stones. I have never been myself, but I count it as one of the top 5 things I want to see. For now, I will locate my fedora, a bullwhip and (toy)pistol, living vicariously the Indian Jones thrill (Do you suppose they timed this dig to coincide with the I.J. film being release ina couple months?).
I look forward to seeing their results. However as to interpretation of their raw data, I would urge people to find David MacCauley’s “Motel of the Mysteries”. It is a hillarious parody of profound meaning in archeological finds.
posted March 31, 2008 at 6:42 pm
You really should go if you ever get a chance, jestrfyl. It is so worth it! I couldn’t have sun bathed,however, when I went, as it was raining the entire hour (6-7:00 AM ) we (my sisters and I) were inside. That didn’t “dampen” my experience though.
posted March 31, 2008 at 7:40 pm
Well, I’m glad, though a little surprised, that the Neo-Pagans aren’t voicing any objections so this can go on peacefully. But then, I suppose when you worship a bunch of rocks that’ve stood outside for 2,800 years, the issue of fragility isn’t quite as big as in other religions.
Although really, this all seems pointless; we already know where Stonehenge came from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonehenge#Arthurian_legend.
God bless.
posted March 31, 2008 at 8:01 pm
Thanks Joey. Wow, a construction phase of 3,000 to 6,500 years. Only the RCC still thinks on those time scales now, as far as I know. Can you imagine an American project lasting 30 years? Of course we are “committed” to protecting radioactive waste for Millennia but we all know in a few decades a Republican congress and/or president will decide it’s a waste of money and instead distribute the funding to needy billionaires as tax relief.
posted March 31, 2008 at 10:04 pm
“Wow, a construction phase of 3,000 to 6,500 years. Only the RCC still thinks on those time scales now, as far as I know. Can you imagine an American project lasting 30 years?”
nmns – yeah, the interstate system near Disney World. When it is actually finished, Porky Pig (I know Warner, not Disney) will appear in the sky for the cosmic “That’s All Folks”
posted April 1, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Joey:
Why would Neo-Pagans object? There has been a lot of research trying to find out more about a very unique, special, and yes, sacred place.
posted April 1, 2008 at 4:38 pm
Native Americans often object when they are allowed to. There seems to be a bad history between archaeologists and some of the peoples they’ve studied and I’m not sure what it all is but some may be that the archaeologists’ story about Indians’ history varies a lot from theirs. Sort of like if an astronomer told a creationist the universe is billions of years old.
posted April 1, 2008 at 6:19 pm
Pagansister, Stonehenge has always intrigued me, I’ve always said I wish they and the pyramids could talk to us. You probably exp. a far memory when you visited them, as you have ancestors connected to them. You were fortunate to spend an hour inside them, instead of standing outside looking in.
posted April 1, 2008 at 7:39 pm
Yes, Henrietta, I was very fortunate to have been able to spend an hour inside. The personal connection as well as the spiritual connection are strong for me.