The Virginian-Pilot and The Ledger-Star, Norfolk, VA – July 11, 2008
By Laurie Goodstein
The New York Times
Generations of recovering alcoholics, soldiers, weary parents, exploited workers, and just about anybody feeling beaten down by life have found solace in a short prayer that begins: “God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change.”
Now the Serenity Prayer is about to endure a controversy over its authorship that is likely to be anything but serene.
For more than 70 years, the composer of the prayer was thought to be the Protestant theologian Reinhold Niebuhr, one of modern Christianity’s most towering figures. Niebuhr, who died in 1971, said he was quite sure he had written it, and his wife, Ursula, also a theologian, dated its composition to the early 1940s.
His daughter Elisabeth Sifton wrote a book about the prayer in 2003 in which she described her father first using it in 1943 in an “ordinary Sunday service” at a church in Heath, Mass., where the Niebuhr family spent their summers.
Now, a law librarian at Yale, using new databases of archival documents, has found newspaper clippings and a book from as far back as 1936 that quote close versions of the prayer. The quotes are from civic leaders all over the United States.
Some of them refer to the prayer as if it were a proverb, while others appear to claim it as their own poetry. None of them attribute the prayer to a particular source. And they never mention Reinhold Niebuhr.
An article about the mystery of the prayer, by Fred R. Shapiro, associate library director and lecturer at Yale Law School, will be published next week in the Yale Alumni Magazine. It will be followed by a rebuttal from Sifton.
Shapiro said: “Reinhold Niebuhr was a very honest person who was very forthright and modest about his role in the Serenity Prayer. My interpretation would be that he probably unconsciously adapted it from something that he had heard or read.”
Sifton faults Shapiro’s approach as computer-driven and deprived of historical and theological context. She said her father traveled widely in the 1930s, preaching in college chapels and to church groups – especially YMCAs and YWCAs – and could have used the prayer then.
Sifton said the newly unearthed quotes were merely evidence that her father’s preaching had a broad impact.
A Niebuhr biographer, Charles C. Brown, said that perhaps Sifton’s theory was correct and that the newspaper quotations were from people who heard Niebuhr speak the prayer years before he wrote it down.
who wrote it?
For years it was thought that the Serenity Prayer was written by Protestant theologian Reinhold Niebuhr in the early 1940s.
(C) 2008 The Virginian-Pilot and The Ledger-Star, Norfolk, VA. via ProQuest Information and Learning Company; All Rights Reserved



posted July 11, 2008 at 5:20 pm
Give me the strength not to care.
posted July 11, 2008 at 5:58 pm
nnmns, I agree.
It amazes me how quick people are to claim authorship of the insipid. See the lawsuit surrounding the “Footsteps in the Sand” drivel from a previous B-net News posting.
posted July 11, 2008 at 7:06 pm
It was probably Reinhold Niebuhr’s poem. In the days of the 30′s and 40′s I don’t think copywrites were used as now. People heard snitches and snatches of poems and improvised on to them. The ones that care are the families who are left and who take pride in what their loved ones wrote.
posted July 11, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Actually, who cares who wrote it? It apparently has helped many folks deal with life so the authorship really isn’t important.
posted July 12, 2008 at 2:12 am
Ok ps you’ve made me care a little. It expresses a basic good idea (except for the god part, which is downplayed) in a way that a lot of people probably remember so it does have value.
But I still don’t care who wrote it.
posted July 12, 2008 at 2:06 pm
nnmns:
My husband, who is like minded to me as to religion, had the saying in his office, without the God part. It works just as well.
posted July 12, 2008 at 10:20 pm
Without “the God part,” from whom are you asking for the serenity to accapt things you cannot change?
“No one, or No thing in particular; whether you exist or not, grant me …”
Does’nt sound too comforting or inspiring to me.
posted July 12, 2008 at 11:12 pm
I don’t think that the folks for whom this prayer is so meaningful would know a Neibuhr from their neighbor. Nor do I think they would care. The prayer is not copyrighted – for good reason. This is not a question of royalties – which is as it should be. It has no magic powers to control and no secret meaning. It is a prayer for people who are in need. I really don’t think this is at all significant, useful, or meaningful in nayone’s lives.
posted July 13, 2008 at 2:25 pm
The words work just fine without invoking a diety, sinsonte.
posted July 13, 2008 at 4:34 pm
the first comment is the funniest thing i read today!
posted July 13, 2008 at 7:19 pm
It is true this prayer has helped many hurting folk and folk just trying to face the pain of the mundane. I personally use it though my earlier shaky sobriety which has given way to a more stable, serine, and sober relationship with the Lord.
Most folk I know who use it know both the short abbreviated version as well as the long version;
and jest, yes they do know the author. It’s been a wonderful shelter for many during their storms of life and a help just to get through the unknown moments to come.
I think it will weather this controversy, and I’m pretty sure this won’t shake Reinhold.