By Nicole Neroulias
Religion News Service
Mark Kushner pulled up to the Watson family’s suburban Philadelphia home a week after the birth of their first son, Colin. In the dining room, he unpacked the tools of his trade: sterilized surgical instruments, topical anesthetic, prayer shawls and a small bottle of kosher wine.
The shawls went back into his black bag. But to Megan and Christopher Watson’s happy surprise, the mohel — pronounced “moyle,” the title for a Jewish ritual circumciser — had copies of several prayers appropriate for the Presbyterian parents to read for the occasion.
“We thank You for the miracle of human experience in the birth of our child,” they recited, as Kushner gently rocked their infant before the procedure.
Kushner, who is based in Philadelphia, and Philip Sherman, a mohel in the New York City area, say they have performed more than 30,000 circumcisions since training together in Israel in the 1970s. Most of their business comes from traditional brit milah ceremonies for 8-day-old Jewish boys. But in recent years, they have increasingly catered to Christian families who eschew a hospital procedure in favor of a $300 to $800 house call — a trend Sherman has dubbed “holistic circumcision.”
“They want their babies circumcised in the comfort of their homes surrounded by family and friends, and they want it performed by someone highly experienced, who brings spirituality and meaning to the practice,” he said. “And it’s over in 30 seconds, compared to what hospitals do, which can be from 20 to 45 minutes, with the baby strapped down.”
Many Christian clients, including the Watsons, liked what they saw at a friend’s brit milah, also known as a bris. Others are conservative Christians who want to follow Old Testament tradition, or learned about holistic circumcisions from the Internet, their doctors or word-of-mouth, Kushner said.
Yet this anecdotal rise in Christians calling on mohels comes as the U.S. circumcision rate — historically much higher than in other parts of the world — is in decline. In contrast to the 85 percent reported in 1965, just 65 percent of all male newborns in American hospitals were circumcised in 1999, according to the most recent figures from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Reliable data on religious circumcisions outside hospitals is hard to come by.
Medical studies suggest circumcision may reduce the risk of penile cancer, urinary tract infections and HIV transmission. But since 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics has stated there is “insufficient data to recommend routine neonatal circumcision.”
Critics argue the procedure causes physical and psychological pain to a child and diminishes sexual pleasure for adults, regardless of whether the foreskin gets removed in a clinical setting by medical residents or during a brit milah among loved ones.
“It makes no difference to the child who does the cutting, or what is hanging on the wall,” said Ronald Goldman, executive director of the Circumcision Resource Center in Boston, and author of two books opposing the practice for Jews and non-Jews alike.
Goldman, who compares circumcision to removing a fingertip, believes “it’s still traumatic. It still removes a natural, healthy, functioning body part.” Many families continue the trend only because men want their sons to look like them, he added, and the women don’t feel that it’s their place to argue.
Megan Watson acknowledges that she had mixed feelings about having Colin circumcised, but deferred to her husband’s judgment. At least at home, she said, they could comfort their son throughout the process, and she could breastfeed him soon afterwards.
As Christopher Watson held his screaming baby’s legs still on the tabletop pillow, Kushner snipped the foreskin off the tiny penis. The process took less than a minute.
Afterwards, the infant’s wails surrendered to a wine-dipped cotton swab, then his mother’s breast, while Kushner relayed a list of instructions about how to care for the wound over the next three days.
A week later, with Colin completely healed, his mother said she would wholeheartedly recommend using a mohel to other non-Jewish families who want their sons circumcised.
“Everything is wonderful. We’ve been having some good sleep-filled nights; Colin’s been sleeping about four, five hours at a time,” Watson said. “He’s a pretty happy baby.”
Copyright 2008 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



posted August 19, 2008 at 8:57 pm
If this makes the parents happier, then why not? It certainly is more pleasant than a hospital.
posted August 20, 2008 at 12:50 am
I think it’s great that mohels do circumcisions for non-Jewish boys. If Christians are going to have their boys circumcised, they might as well go for a mohel.
posted August 20, 2008 at 12:43 pm
I also think it’s great that the “service” can be and is provided to non-Jewish families as well.
I do have a question, though, for anyone who knows. Since Muslims also get circumcised, what is their equivalent to a mohel?
posted August 21, 2008 at 7:45 pm
I am happy to have my circumcision done the way it was done I think the less memory of that event the better I’d hardly want to wait until I could experience the full trauma of the operation and have a fully detailed memory of event. Also I wonder is some of the horror stories of bad cuts are true? Ouch!!!
posted August 21, 2008 at 8:52 pm
ck, what on earth are you talking about?
Jewish ritual circumcision is done on the 8th day of life. I don’t susupect there would be too many memories there.
And, the article seems to imply that the Christians using the service of the mohel are doing the same thing.
Unlike our patriarch Abraham, who circumcised himself as a adult… As do some African cultures, or so I read…
posted August 21, 2008 at 10:49 pm
“Unlike our patriarch Abraham, who circumcised himself as a adult..”
ecl
Not being male, I would say “OUCH” anyway.
posted August 21, 2008 at 11:25 pm
ecl I was just commenting on my feelings about circumcism. I know about the 8th day and I agree with the article. I also know about the tribes in Africa I saw the sharpened stone ritual knives some tribes use its a miracle the come away without infection. ouch.
posted August 22, 2008 at 8:28 am
cknuck, ok, got it.
posted August 22, 2008 at 8:31 am
sis, when one my nephews got circumcised after his birth a few years ago, the mohel first put on emla cream, which numbs the surface of the skin, reducing discomfort a great degree. Frankly, he barely made a peep and seemed to be more uncomfortable being restrained than anything else. I think it’s a great idea and that more mohels should use this method.
posted August 22, 2008 at 11:48 am
ecl:
If I had known about mohels who made house calls to non-Jews 36 years ago, I would have called one! My son might have appreciated it even more than me. Don’t know if that was available then…probably not.