By Ashley Gipson
Religion News Service
Washington – More than 100 religious leaders have urged the federal government and both major political parties to develop long-term solutions to address poverty and environmental concerns along the Gulf Coast.
In an attempt to solve what they called a “moral crisis,” the religious leaders sent the statement to national leaders of both parties to urge them to restore the Gulf Coast communities by creating resident-led partnerships that will enable residents to help rebuild their communities.
The statement also called for government officials to increase federal and state funding for affordable housing and coastal wetland restoration, and to implement a flood control system to protect the communities from future severe weather.
“We have learned that acts of faith and mercy alone, no matter how profound, cannot provide everything needed for a sustainable recovery,” the statement said.
Hurricanes Ike and Gustav reminded the nation that there is still work to be done in the Gulf Coast, and the slow recovery from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita has left many survivors unable to return to their communities, the leaders said.
“While the nation has learned to better prepare for this latest hurricane … we have still failed to protect the well-being of Gulf Coast survivors,” they said.
While the statement acknowledged previous relief efforts and praised volunteers of all faiths, it cited “years of improper stewardship” and inadequate flood protection as violations of human rights.
“We believe it is a moral obligation for the federal government to fulfill its promises for Gulf Coast recovery: empowering residents to return and participate in equitably rebuilding their communities,” they said.
Among the people to sign the statement were Rev. Richard Cizik, vice president of the National Association of Evangelicals; Richard Stearns, president of World Vision; Rabbi Steve Gutow, executive director of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs; Ingrid Mattson, president of the Islamic Society of North America; and the Rev. Larry Snyder, president of Catholic Charities USA.
Copyright 2008 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



posted September 16, 2008 at 7:11 pm
There needs to be an informed discussion or discussions about what parts near the hurricane areas the governments will aid to rebuild. Along the Mississippi the government has bought some low-lying areas and moved towns out. The Mississippi floods more often than some area on the gulf or Atlantic coast gets a hurricane but it’s the same principle. At what point do we no longer risk any taxpayer money to have people living in those areas or to have certain risky but nonessential businesses there? Farms, parks, hunting land and wildlife reserves make sense and to the extent we need oil businesses there they should be built extremely well so they survive and do not pollute when they are in hurricanes.
This is a very hard kind of discussion to have, politically, and it’s hard to even think how you’d choose a group to conduct such a discussion. Nonetheless it’s an important topic.
posted September 16, 2008 at 8:40 pm
Barack Obama said he’ll work to see that the Gulf will have the type of protections they should have had years ago, etc. I read a comment on CNN that said he was a waffeler, because he promises too much. Don’t understand if this person knows the meaning of waffeler, but it didn’t make much sense to me. He promises what he intends to do, and he will do it, because he is who he is, Barack Obama, who has always had the attitude of “Yes I Can”. Many people don’t know that they CAN, they think that someone else should do it for them.
posted September 16, 2008 at 8:58 pm
“While the statement acknowledged previous relief efforts and praised volunteers of all faiths, it cited ‘years of improper stewardship’ and inadequate flood protection as violations of human rights.”
Okay, this is just a little mini-rant here: as a Gulf Coast resident, I say, yes, more flood protection would be nice. Environmental aid would be nice. Less poverty would be nice. The governments and charities should do things that address these problems.
But as a thinking human being, I say that people need to stop calling every little thing a human rights violation! Yes, these are all things the government should do, but not doing them is not the equivalent of Auschwitz, the gulag or even Gitmo! Okay? If the government were tying people to trees in the middle of these hurricanes so they couldn’t escape, that would be a human rights violation. Just not giving them a dyke to help with flooding, at most, irresponsible. If you want people to take actual crimes against humanity seriously, stop throwing such loaded terms around so freakin’ loosely!
…Okay, I’m done now. Other than that little pet peeve, good for these groups, and God bless.
posted September 16, 2008 at 10:26 pm
Actions speak louder than words. Let’s see if any of the urging makes any difference in actions. “W” promised help to the folks that have endured Ike. Let’s see if the help for those folks is any swifter than those for Kitrina.
posted September 16, 2008 at 11:31 pm
Our planet has a way of taking care of itself. I too am a Gulf coast resident. And I see the inexcussably expensive houses sliding into the sea. We need some sensible building codes, though Florida has been tougher on these than almost anything in the entire Code of Law. We need to acknowledge the critical importance of natural barriers to natural events, like hurricanes. Mangroves, barrier islands, wetland and the Everglades are more than mere inconveniences and obstacles to a better view. There are surely more sensible ways for us to make use of natural design as well as ways to enjoy and thrive in cooperation with the environment. Allowing a few folks who can flash some cash (and then demand the public pay to replace what they foolish placed in harms way) to alter and destroy the coastlines is stupid – literally stupid, asleep, nodding off instead of doing the job.
posted September 18, 2008 at 12:26 pm
Joey, thanks for speaking some sense!
We have learned that acts of faith and mercy alone, no matter how profound, cannot provide everything needed for a sustainable recovery,” the statement said.
-Has anyone told “W”? He still seems to think that trying to sound like a “good Christian” and in actuality, abdicating reponsibility, is the thing to do.
Jest, Your point is well taken. Whether it’s coastal NJ, the Outer Banks, Florida, California, etc, where houses have slid into whatever body of water lies nearby, coastlines often face severe weather, and developers should not be given a pass/waiver/variance just because money talks.