Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

In Key Battleground State, Religious Patterns Seem Stable

posted by nsymmonds | 4:46pm Friday October 17, 2008

HERSHEY, Pa. — A group of twentysomethings at the Evangelical Free Church of Hershey spoke admiringly about Barack Obama’s eloquence, his impulse to heal divides and his historic campaign as a black man nominated for the presidency.
But only one of the four in this key battleground state was even leaning toward voting for the Democratic candidate.
John Green, who follows religious voting patterns on a much larger scale for the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, put it this way:
“There’s this capacity for change, but we haven’t seen it yet.”
In an election year when lurid fears for the economy have dimmed the culture wars and the Democratic candidate quotes Scripture, Green said he’s been surprised to find religious voters lining up, so far, much as they did during the 2004 campaign.
Four years ago, evangelicals were solidly in the Republican camp — and proved a major factor in President Bush’s re-election.
This year, high-profile evangelicals describe a broader political agenda: not just abortion and gay marriage, but Darfur, torture, poverty and the environment. Democrats have made direct appeals to people of faith.
So far, though, polls pick up little change in the political allegiance of evangelicals — or of other major religious groups, Green said. “Evangelical Protestants are still supporting the GOP, with a little less enthusiasm. Catholics are pretty divided, but they were pretty divided back in 2004.”
Mainline Protestants are still divided, too, four years later. And Jews and African-American Protestants are still heavily Democratic — Jews a little less so than in 2004 and African-Americans more so.
Still, religious voters have been waiting longer this election to make up their minds.
And the economy — months ago, voters ranked it as a far bigger issue than in 2004 — has taken a sudden and frightening turn at home and abroad, prompting fears of worldwide recession.
All that means that much could change by the time Green analyzes religious voting patterns in Election Day exit polls. “The real test of all this will be the votes in November,” he said.
Dan Zelesko, 28, a divinity student at the Evangelical Theological Seminary in Myerstown, Pa., was the sole Obama supporter in the small group that skipped a church young adult class to talk politics with a reporter.
“What I’ve seen from Democrats is a concern for social justice, distributive justice,” and those are biblical values, Zelesko said.
Many evangelicals, particularly young ones, are disillusioned about aligning with Republicans, he said. Abortion and gay marriage, he said, “have been used to manipulate evangelicals to vote for a party and get political power.”
But those are the top issues for Melissa Manz, 25, a high school Spanish teacher, and she worries about the judges Obama would name.
“I believe life begins at conception and any abortion is murder.
Marriage is between a man and a woman,” she said. “I fear moral bankruptcy.”
Polls show the hot social issues are far lower on voters’ radar this year, but they got a profile boost when McCain named Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate.
Palin is an evangelical who opposes abortion, even after rape or incest. Her 6-month-old son, the youngest of her five children, has Down syndrome — a fact she knew before his birth.
Comments about abortion by Sen. Joe Biden, Obama’s running mate, have also made headlines. Biden is a Catholic — part of the religious group that Green said is most in play this election.
When Biden told reporters his belief that life begins at conception was a matter of personal faith and should not be imposed on others, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops fired back, saying protecting human life was a “demand of justice.”
Obama has the support of some prominent anti-abortion Catholics, including Doug Kmiec, former law dean at Catholic University, who emphasizes the Democrat’s calls for reducing abortion through health care, maternity leave and adoption programs.
But a visit to a men’s prayer group at St. Patrick’s Catholic Church in Carlisle demonstrated the challenge Kmiec’s argument faces with many traditional Catholics.
To a man, they favored McCain, mostly because of his opposition to abortion.
Jim Sollars, 63, said he used to be a Democrat but could no longer support candidates who support abortion rights. A candidate who divorces himself from his faith is dangerous, he said.
Members of several midstate churches outlined their top issues in recent interviews, they sometimes — though far from always — framed them in terms of faith.
“This is not an election about religion, but our faith emphasizes what we do,” said Sara Wilson, part of a Sunday school class at Mechanicsburg Church of the Brethren that studies the heritage of the historic peace church.
“God is always on the side of the oppressed and the poor,” she said.
Betty Barnes, a retired executive secretary who attends Pine Street Presbyterian Church in Harrisburg, listed the economy and the war — which she supports — as top concerns.
“The people I’m for, I hope they have a faith,” she said, but “I try never to look at a political picture from a religious standpoint.”
As voters respond to the unfolding economic crisis, religion will continue to play a role at the ballot box, Green predicted.
Evangelicals’ emphasis on their personal relationship to Jesus might point toward conservative economic solutions built on personal responsibility, for example, while the Catholic social justice tradition might point crucial swing voters toward a communal solution.
“One could imagine a situation where people are voting their economic interests. We could see a decline in importance of religion at the ballot box,” Green said. “But I would be shocked if it vanished.”
By MARY WARNER
c. 2008 Religion News Service

(Mary Warner writes for The Patriot-News in Harrisburg, Pa.)
Copyright 2008 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



Previous Posts

Did Obama mean to pick a fight with America’s two largest denominations
In an election year of all times, why would President Barack Obama choose to infuriate bothAmerica’s Catholics and Southern Baptists? “It seems that Obama, in a classic act of hubris, has created the means of his own destruction,” writes conservative commentator J.R. Dunn in the American Th

posted 4:42:46pm Feb. 13, 2012 | read full post »

Did Rastafarian spokesman Bob Marley become a Christian on his deathbed?
Three decades after the death of legendary Jamaican musician Bob Marley, an intriguing story is circulating. “What most people don't know, and many try to cover up, is the fact that Bob Marley converted to Christianity in 1980,” proclaims an article that has appeared on a number of websites.

posted 4:52:03pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »

Are U.S. colleges hostile to Christian students?
Are Christian kids on U.S. college campuses facing open hostility and discrimination because of their faith? Supreme Court Justice Justice Samuel Alito seems to think so. So does U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Daniel Ripple – and human rights attorneys Gregory Baylor and Jordan Lorenc

posted 12:18:26pm Feb. 09, 2012 | read full post »

Building a Temple to Atheism
When I say temple, you think religious place of worship right?  When I say atheist, you think one that believes there is no God.  Stay with me now, when I say religion, don’t you think about the worship of God?  Before this blog becomes a full blown say what you are thinking game, let me get to

posted 5:49:11pm Feb. 03, 2012 | read full post »

Romney Nabs Second Primary Victory in Florida
"I stand ready to lead this party and to lead our nation.  My leadership will end the Obama era and begin a new era of American prosperity," Romney said in his victory speech in Tampa Tuesday night.  Romney who won all 50 of Florida’s convention delegates is the only Republican candidate to have

posted 5:15:58pm Feb. 02, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(17)
post a comment
Henrietta22

posted October 17, 2008 at 6:28 pm


This group of questioneers should read the Editorial in the LA Times, who came out and endorsed Barack Obama today! They will give you many reasons to vote for him. LATimes.com



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted October 17, 2008 at 7:03 pm


Thinking like that described has cost the US eight terrible years under GWB. Those who vote for yet four more years like that have to answer the simple question: why do you hate America?
Under GWB we ignored a war against terrorists and pursued a pointless war against Saddam. McCain would continue that war into the unforeseeable future.
Under GWB the US’s economy and tax system was bent into an instrument of class warfare against the middle class, making it much harder for them to support their families, send their children to college and prepare to retire. McCain says he’ll continue those economic policies.
Under GWB the earth (God’s earth?) was ignored so companies could profit more at the expense of people who have to breathe bad air and drink bad water. McCain will surely be better but his staff is composed of corporate lobbyists so why should we expect much more effort toward solving our most pressing problems.
John McCain is part of the problem, not part of the solution. And Sarah Palin is clearly unprepared to be President; by picking her McCain showed the real contempt he has for the rest of us.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted October 17, 2008 at 10:38 pm


Good to see your post, Henrietta!!
It seems that the religious folks haven’t learned anything in the last 8 years under the “W” administration. They’re happy that we are a zillion dollars in debt, we have an unjust war going on in Iraq, people out of work with no jobs to be found, the stock market is frozen, IRA’s are going down the drain etc.? If that’s the case, then vote McCain/Palin. I’m sure that they’ll get us out of this mess, and if the worst should happen, they will have the first woman president…who will interfer with woman’s right to choice, and who thinks that she knows how to deal with the world, because she can see Russia from her living room window. Good luck!



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted October 18, 2008 at 1:03 am


Heck, even the Chicago Tribune endorsed Obama and they’d never endorsed a Democrat since they were founded in 1847.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted October 18, 2008 at 11:51 am


Yes, ps I just can’t shut up when something bothers me enough! I heard last night on CNN that the LATimes hadn’t endorsed any candidate since 1972, so this is significant! This hasn’t anything to do with anything, but in case you haven’t read it: Glenn Beck is going to Fox. Makes sense.



report abuse
 

Confessoressa

posted October 18, 2008 at 12:08 pm


If Colin Powell throws in his endorcement this weekend, it’s in the bag.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted October 18, 2008 at 12:35 pm


It’s never in the bag till it’s over! There are a lot of ways this can still be stolen. Keep doing whatever you can do to avoid four more years of Bush. Please!



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted October 18, 2008 at 9:04 pm


I agree, nnmns, it’s “not over until the fat lady sings”! Things look good for Obama, but even Obama is telling folks not to get overconfident. Look what happened with the 2000 election!
McCain/Palin is just to scary to think about.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted October 18, 2008 at 10:15 pm


If voters are going to vote setting the political candidate as their barometer of spirituality or religion then this is a crazy world. People have got to stop looking for a savior in the political arenas and just vote on the merits of the man or woman political policies. I almost said political integrity but it is politics we are talking about



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted October 18, 2008 at 10:57 pm


“People have got to stop looking for a savior in the political arenas and just vote on the merits of the man or woman political policies.”
Amen!



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted October 19, 2008 at 12:14 pm


Colin Powell has endorsed Obama. He tells you why he has chosen Obama on his “merits”. Go to LATIMES.Com. Confessoressa.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted October 19, 2008 at 5:32 pm


cknuck, you’ve hit the mark with your statement about people not looking for a savior in the political arenas and just voting on the merits of the person and their political policies.



report abuse
 

sinsonte

posted October 19, 2008 at 8:47 pm


Obama is the Savior! His birth was proclaimed by angels to a group of Acorn volunteers falsifing voter registration cards by night and three wise ’60′s radicals brought him gifts of ganja, tie-dye, and patchouli. None are so blind as those who refuse to see.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted October 20, 2008 at 2:10 pm


So I suppose the McCain/Palin ticket is the one we need? 8 more years of prosperity, and peace in the Middle East. If that is what folks want they’ll vote for the Republican ticket. I certainly hope this country learned something in the last 8 years…they not only goofed in 2000, but what’s worse, they voted for more of the same in 2004! Thanks for the ride, “W”!



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted October 20, 2008 at 7:17 pm


Palin needs to go home and be a governor to Alaska; count the Pollack swimming in the waters between Alaska and Russia, perhaps. She didn’t think there’s proof of global weather disturbance. A new article states that the Pollack fishing off of Alaska is dropping away because they are all swimming to Russia where the water is colder. They can’t find food and live in the waters off of Alaska, too warm. The Polar Bears are floating away and drowning for the same reason. She needs to hurry back to Alaska and help her people, and forget about being a Vice-President, of where? oh!, U.S.A.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted October 21, 2008 at 5:27 pm


Hentietta, if Palin goes home to continue to be governor of Alaska, because Mac doesn’t get elected…she can STILL see Russia from her living room window (or her back yard?) and dream of what didn’t happen.
Oh, does anyone find it interesting that she keeps toting that newborn around to all the events, making sure she carries him onto the stage before she hands him off to someone so she can do her speech? IMO there is no problem with her taking him with her while she travels, but does she need to carry him on stage before each talk? Is this a statement letting everyone know that she is just a great “soccer mom”? Sorry, this has been bugging me so I wondered if I’m the only one that finds it a deliberate political move.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted October 27, 2008 at 12:20 pm


I’ve thought much the same way ps. I must say I enjoy seeing her family, but I don’t think I would have used mine in the way she has, and continues to.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.