WASHINGTON — The top Washington lobbyist for the National Association of Evangelicals, who had already faced criticism for his embrace of environmental activism, resigned Thursday (Dec. 11) after signaling support for same-sex civil unions.
The Rev. Richard Cizik, who had worked in the NAE’s Washington office for 28 years, resigned after being harshly criticized for the civil union comments and saying he voted for President-elect Barack Obama in the Virginia primary despite Obama’s support of abortion rights.
NAE President Leith Anderson said Cizik’s comments in a Dec. 2 interview with National Public Radio’s “Fresh Air” program were problematic because they did not reflect the views of many NAE member organizations.
“I think that what people did communicate … is that he cannot continue as a spokesperson for NAE, and the implication of that is that he resign,” Anderson said in an interview Thursday.
Anderson, a Minnesota megachurch pastor, said he and Cizik talked for “hours” Wednesday after Cizik returned from an overseas trip and flew to Minneapolis. Both men came to a joint decision that Cizik needed to resign.
Cizik, 58, who was the NAE’s vice president for governmental affairs and public face in the media and on Capitol Hill, declined to comment on Thursday.
In the NPR interview, Cizik spoke on an array of topics, from gay marriage to abortion to last month’s elections. The controversy marked the second time in as many years that his comments sparked an outcry from more conservative Christian leaders.
“It’s possible for me to disagree with a candidate on high-profile issues and still believe that, on the basis of character or philosophy, he’s the better of the two candidates,” Cizik said in the interview.
“So, in this case, it would be possible, as evangelicals did, to disagree with Barack Obama on same-sex marriage and abortion and yet vote for him. We know they did, not because of those positions … but in spite of those positions.”
In the NPR interview, Cizik said he voted for Obama in the Virginia primary but did not disclose how he voted in the general election. He also said his views about gays and marriage were evolving.
“I’m shifting, I have to admit,” he said. “In other words, I would be willing to say I believe in civil unions. I don’t officially support redefining marriage from its traditional definition, I don’t think.”
Critics from conservative groups, including Concerned Women for America and the Institute on Religion and Democracy, blasted Cizik, saying he didn’t represent “biblical orthodoxy” or “millions of other evangelicals.”
“He would say one thing to liberal audiences and say something different to NAE-type audiences,” said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, whose organization is not a member of the NAE.
“So the NPR interview took the cloak off and revealed Rich Cizik’s true positions that … he has apparently held for quite a while. This is a good move forward for NAE. NAE needs a representative who is passionate about the biblical principles that bind NAE members together and they need a voice on Capitol Hill who truly represents their constituency.”
Evangelical leaders, including Focus on the Family founder James Dobson, had called for Cizik to be fired in 2007 because of his “relentless campaign” against global warming.
At that time, the NAE board stood by Cizik and reaffirmed the group’s commitment to caring for the environment that was included in a 2003 statement on “public engagement.”
In the interview with “Fresh Air,” Cizik said Christians should care about both family and environmental issues.
“It’s strategically important for Christians to care for this earth, just as it’s important for Christians to care for the family,” he said.
“These are equals. They’re both part of God’s concern. They’re both part of his heart.”
Asked if Cizik’s resignation puts the NAE in a difficult situation just two years after former NAE president Ted Haggard resigned because of a sex and drug scandal, Anderson said the two departures were not related.
“They’re so totally unrelated and so completely different that it’s a connection that I don’t even make in my mind,” he said. “Any connection that anybody would make would be people that read news stories every few years and are connecting dots that are different. I just don’t connect those dots.”
Anderson said despite the recent controversy, Cizik made significant contributions to the evangelical umbrella organization.
Cizik was outspoken on issues ranging from sexual trafficking to religious persecution and was instrumental in writing the NAE’s position statement on civic responsibility.
“He has done a great deal of good,” said Anderson. “I think the unfortunate part of this is that the way he spoke and what he said in this interview hurt his credibility as a spokesperson.”
By ADELLE M. BANKS c. 2008 Religion News Service
Copyright 2008 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



posted December 11, 2008 at 7:09 pm
“In other words, I would be willing to say I believe in civil unions. I don’t officially support redefining marriage from its traditional definition, I don’t think.”
For what it’s worth, I think it takes a rather humble disposition to admit that one doesn’t know precisely where he stands on a particular issue. Adhering to a religion containing definitive articles of faith I too admit to grapling with these issues from time to time, even though I maintain a conservative disposition on the vast majority of social issues.
May the Lord be with you Rev. Cizik!!
posted December 11, 2008 at 7:41 pm
I heard that interview and thought he made a good deal of sense. It’s too bad the organization is so far behind him.
posted December 11, 2008 at 8:03 pm
Goes to show one shouldn’t disagree with the NAE! You lose your job, because you vote for the “wrong” man? I admire him speaking out.
posted December 11, 2008 at 8:25 pm
Congratulations are in order for Rev. Richard Cizik, who has moved ahead in Christian growth!
posted December 11, 2008 at 9:27 pm
I don’t know about his Christian growth but I find no fault in his political position other than as a leader in the church perhaps he should have been a little less outspoken in politics and more in matters of faith.
posted December 11, 2008 at 10:33 pm
I think the resignation of Cizik and Haggard ARE related in that both were (1) proponents of environmental issues (2) moderate (compared to the far, far right) on gay issues. I’m sure Dobson is happy to have these two relative moderates out of his way.
posted December 11, 2008 at 11:16 pm
My wife and I were married by Pastor Anderson at Wooddale 24 years ago. Leith is a man of impeccable integrity and pastoral skills, which have only strengthened with the passage of time.
I have been cheered and encouraged by Rich Cizik’s service to the NAE. I have always been a “progressive evangelical.” I see a parallel to President Bush’s former press secretary Scott McClellan, who served proudly with skill and integrity, but came to see the real face of the administration. With Cizik, as his wisdom grew, he came to see the true nature of the culture wars in the evangelical subculture. In the end, he finally angered the Dobson sycophants so much that the NAE was in danger of falling into the abyss that my beloved Episcopal church has been dealing with for years.
Pastor Leith no doubt gave Rich his very best pastoral advice, but Pastor Leith is necessarily a wise pragmatist, too, as the head of NAE, and the last thing you need in an organization is your main communications person to become a controversial lightning rod. There is no judgment of Cizik’s values here… only the practical reality that he can no longer serve the NAE’s diverse membership which includes young progressive evangelicals as well as socially arch-conservative evangelicals who believe that no quarter, no compromise, zero tolerance, be given to those who won’t reject those among the baptized who are different from themselves.
posted December 12, 2008 at 11:45 am
” Focus on the Family founder James Dobson, had called for Cizik to be fired in 2007 because of his “relentless campaign” against global warming.”
BIG ‘surprise’, eh?
Evangelicalism used to be about proclaiming the ‘Good News’ – which used to be that God’s love was for all people. The NAE is too selective to be calling themselves Evnagelicals, let alone Christians.
posted December 12, 2008 at 11:46 am
The times are changing. NAE better realize that civil unions and same sex marriage are not going away.
posted December 12, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Their loss; on to bigger and better things for this man.
posted December 12, 2008 at 4:35 pm
Chinks in the wall, pebbles in the bucket, styro-wormies in the box — all signs that the world is changing bit by bit, person by person. Funny thing about that is this is how the Church grew 2,000 years ago – person by person, word by word. Don’t you just love it?! Leaving Dobson in the dust is simply waiting to happen.
posted December 12, 2008 at 5:51 pm
During this interview Cizik did nothing but paint Evangelicals in a positive light, as far as I’m concerned. I just listened to this Fresh Air podcast yesterday and was intrigued to learn that there are Evangelicals who support gay marriage and are active in the environmental movement. I am very disappointed that the NEA chose to force Cizik out. He is an indication of where the Evangelicals are heading ideologically whether the Evangelical old guard realizes it or not.
posted December 12, 2008 at 9:36 pm
I’m so glad to have learned a couple more reasons to be a big supporter of Richard Cizik