Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

Cizik, Under Pressure for Gay Comments, Resigns From the National Association of Evangelicals

posted by nsymmonds | 6:13pm Thursday December 11, 2008

WASHINGTON — The top Washington lobbyist for the National Association of Evangelicals, who had already faced criticism for his embrace of environmental activism, resigned Thursday (Dec. 11) after signaling support for same-sex civil unions.
The Rev. Richard Cizik, who had worked in the NAE’s Washington office for 28 years, resigned after being harshly criticized for the civil union comments and saying he voted for President-elect Barack Obama in the Virginia primary despite Obama’s support of abortion rights.
NAE President Leith Anderson said Cizik’s comments in a Dec. 2 interview with National Public Radio’s “Fresh Air” program were problematic because they did not reflect the views of many NAE member organizations.
“I think that what people did communicate … is that he cannot continue as a spokesperson for NAE, and the implication of that is that he resign,” Anderson said in an interview Thursday.
Anderson, a Minnesota megachurch pastor, said he and Cizik talked for “hours” Wednesday after Cizik returned from an overseas trip and flew to Minneapolis. Both men came to a joint decision that Cizik needed to resign.
Cizik, 58, who was the NAE’s vice president for governmental affairs and public face in the media and on Capitol Hill, declined to comment on Thursday.
In the NPR interview, Cizik spoke on an array of topics, from gay marriage to abortion to last month’s elections. The controversy marked the second time in as many years that his comments sparked an outcry from more conservative Christian leaders.
“It’s possible for me to disagree with a candidate on high-profile issues and still believe that, on the basis of character or philosophy, he’s the better of the two candidates,” Cizik said in the interview.
“So, in this case, it would be possible, as evangelicals did, to disagree with Barack Obama on same-sex marriage and abortion and yet vote for him. We know they did, not because of those positions … but in spite of those positions.”
In the NPR interview, Cizik said he voted for Obama in the Virginia primary but did not disclose how he voted in the general election. He also said his views about gays and marriage were evolving.
“I’m shifting, I have to admit,” he said. “In other words, I would be willing to say I believe in civil unions. I don’t officially support redefining marriage from its traditional definition, I don’t think.”
Critics from conservative groups, including Concerned Women for America and the Institute on Religion and Democracy, blasted Cizik, saying he didn’t represent “biblical orthodoxy” or “millions of other evangelicals.”
“He would say one thing to liberal audiences and say something different to NAE-type audiences,” said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, whose organization is not a member of the NAE.
“So the NPR interview took the cloak off and revealed Rich Cizik’s true positions that … he has apparently held for quite a while. This is a good move forward for NAE. NAE needs a representative who is passionate about the biblical principles that bind NAE members together and they need a voice on Capitol Hill who truly represents their constituency.”
Evangelical leaders, including Focus on the Family founder James Dobson, had called for Cizik to be fired in 2007 because of his “relentless campaign” against global warming.
At that time, the NAE board stood by Cizik and reaffirmed the group’s commitment to caring for the environment that was included in a 2003 statement on “public engagement.”
In the interview with “Fresh Air,” Cizik said Christians should care about both family and environmental issues.
“It’s strategically important for Christians to care for this earth, just as it’s important for Christians to care for the family,” he said.
“These are equals. They’re both part of God’s concern. They’re both part of his heart.”
Asked if Cizik’s resignation puts the NAE in a difficult situation just two years after former NAE president Ted Haggard resigned because of a sex and drug scandal, Anderson said the two departures were not related.
“They’re so totally unrelated and so completely different that it’s a connection that I don’t even make in my mind,” he said. “Any connection that anybody would make would be people that read news stories every few years and are connecting dots that are different. I just don’t connect those dots.”
Anderson said despite the recent controversy, Cizik made significant contributions to the evangelical umbrella organization.
Cizik was outspoken on issues ranging from sexual trafficking to religious persecution and was instrumental in writing the NAE’s position statement on civic responsibility.
“He has done a great deal of good,” said Anderson. “I think the unfortunate part of this is that the way he spoke and what he said in this interview hurt his credibility as a spokesperson.”
By ADELLE M. BANKS c. 2008 Religion News Service
Copyright 2008 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



Previous Posts

Did Rastafarian spokesman Bob Marley become a Christian on his deathbed?
Three decades after the death of legendary Jamaican musician Bob Marley, an intriguing story is circulating. “What most people don't know, and many try to cover up, is the fact that Bob Marley converted to Christianity in 1980,” proclaims an article that has appeared on a number of websites.

posted 4:52:03pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »

Are U.S. colleges hostile to Christian students?
Are Christian kids on U.S. college campuses facing open hostility and discrimination because of their faith? Supreme Court Justice Justice Samuel Alito seems to think so. So does U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Daniel Ripple – and human rights attorneys Gregory Baylor and Jordan Lorenc

posted 12:18:26pm Feb. 09, 2012 | read full post »

Building a Temple to Atheism
When I say temple, you think religious place of worship right?  When I say atheist, you think one that believes there is no God.  Stay with me now, when I say religion, don’t you think about the worship of God?  Before this blog becomes a full blown say what you are thinking game, let me get to

posted 5:49:11pm Feb. 03, 2012 | read full post »

Romney Nabs Second Primary Victory in Florida
"I stand ready to lead this party and to lead our nation.  My leadership will end the Obama era and begin a new era of American prosperity," Romney said in his victory speech in Tampa Tuesday night.  Romney who won all 50 of Florida’s convention delegates is the only Republican candidate to have

posted 5:15:58pm Feb. 02, 2012 | read full post »

Science Whiz Gets a New Home
17 year-old Samantha Garvey made national headlines when she was selected as an Intel Science Talent Search semi-finalist—one of 300 across the country vying for the top prize, a $100,000 science scholarship.  It was Garvey’s home life that tugged at the heartstrings of people all over the coun

posted 11:53:07am Jan. 30, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(13)
post a comment
Tom

posted December 11, 2008 at 7:09 pm


“In other words, I would be willing to say I believe in civil unions. I don’t officially support redefining marriage from its traditional definition, I don’t think.”
For what it’s worth, I think it takes a rather humble disposition to admit that one doesn’t know precisely where he stands on a particular issue. Adhering to a religion containing definitive articles of faith I too admit to grapling with these issues from time to time, even though I maintain a conservative disposition on the vast majority of social issues.
May the Lord be with you Rev. Cizik!!



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted December 11, 2008 at 7:41 pm


I heard that interview and thought he made a good deal of sense. It’s too bad the organization is so far behind him.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted December 11, 2008 at 8:03 pm


Goes to show one shouldn’t disagree with the NAE! You lose your job, because you vote for the “wrong” man? I admire him speaking out.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted December 11, 2008 at 8:25 pm


Congratulations are in order for Rev. Richard Cizik, who has moved ahead in Christian growth!



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted December 11, 2008 at 9:27 pm


I don’t know about his Christian growth but I find no fault in his political position other than as a leader in the church perhaps he should have been a little less outspoken in politics and more in matters of faith.



report abuse
 

Elfin

posted December 11, 2008 at 10:33 pm


I think the resignation of Cizik and Haggard ARE related in that both were (1) proponents of environmental issues (2) moderate (compared to the far, far right) on gay issues. I’m sure Dobson is happy to have these two relative moderates out of his way.



report abuse
 

Jay Baldwin

posted December 11, 2008 at 11:16 pm


My wife and I were married by Pastor Anderson at Wooddale 24 years ago. Leith is a man of impeccable integrity and pastoral skills, which have only strengthened with the passage of time.
I have been cheered and encouraged by Rich Cizik’s service to the NAE. I have always been a “progressive evangelical.” I see a parallel to President Bush’s former press secretary Scott McClellan, who served proudly with skill and integrity, but came to see the real face of the administration. With Cizik, as his wisdom grew, he came to see the true nature of the culture wars in the evangelical subculture. In the end, he finally angered the Dobson sycophants so much that the NAE was in danger of falling into the abyss that my beloved Episcopal church has been dealing with for years.
Pastor Leith no doubt gave Rich his very best pastoral advice, but Pastor Leith is necessarily a wise pragmatist, too, as the head of NAE, and the last thing you need in an organization is your main communications person to become a controversial lightning rod. There is no judgment of Cizik’s values here… only the practical reality that he can no longer serve the NAE’s diverse membership which includes young progressive evangelicals as well as socially arch-conservative evangelicals who believe that no quarter, no compromise, zero tolerance, be given to those who won’t reject those among the baptized who are different from themselves.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted December 12, 2008 at 11:45 am


” Focus on the Family founder James Dobson, had called for Cizik to be fired in 2007 because of his “relentless campaign” against global warming.”
BIG ‘surprise’, eh?
Evangelicalism used to be about proclaiming the ‘Good News’ – which used to be that God’s love was for all people. The NAE is too selective to be calling themselves Evnagelicals, let alone Christians.



report abuse
 

MikeNYC

posted December 12, 2008 at 11:46 am


The times are changing. NAE better realize that civil unions and same sex marriage are not going away.



report abuse
 

Confessoressa

posted December 12, 2008 at 1:11 pm


Their loss; on to bigger and better things for this man.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted December 12, 2008 at 4:35 pm


Chinks in the wall, pebbles in the bucket, styro-wormies in the box — all signs that the world is changing bit by bit, person by person. Funny thing about that is this is how the Church grew 2,000 years ago – person by person, word by word. Don’t you just love it?! Leaving Dobson in the dust is simply waiting to happen.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted December 12, 2008 at 5:51 pm


During this interview Cizik did nothing but paint Evangelicals in a positive light, as far as I’m concerned. I just listened to this Fresh Air podcast yesterday and was intrigued to learn that there are Evangelicals who support gay marriage and are active in the environmental movement. I am very disappointed that the NEA chose to force Cizik out. He is an indication of where the Evangelicals are heading ideologically whether the Evangelical old guard realizes it or not.



report abuse
 

srta_jenn

posted December 12, 2008 at 9:36 pm


I’m so glad to have learned a couple more reasons to be a big supporter of Richard Cizik



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.