Conservative Anglican leaders unveiled on Wednesday the constitution and laws for a new organization intended to replace the Episcopal Church as the American arm of the Anglican Communion, which has 77 million members worldwide.
The move is the most telling sign yet that the debate over the role of gay and lesbian Christians has torn apart the first church to appoint an openly gay bishop.
Central to the new organization’s constitution is a declaration that the Bible is regarded as the “final authority and unchangeable standard.” The new organization says the Bible’s complex messages about issues such as the ordination of women call for conversation. But the group says the Bible gives a clear message that homosexuality is a sin.
Dubbed the Common Cause Partnership, the leaders represent 100,000 Anglicans who believe the 2003 consecration of New Hampshire Bishop V. Gene Robinson, an openly gay man in a long-term relationship, violated the authority of scripture.
The constitution comes in the wake of a conference held in Israel last June with leaders from more than one-half of the world’s Anglicans. At that conference, the leaders outlined their intentions to, in their view, reform, heal and revitalize the Anglican Communion by adhering to a more literal interpretation of the Bible.
“The public release of our draft constitution is an important concrete step toward the goal of a biblical, missionary and united Anglican Church in North America,” said Bishop Robert Duncan of Pittsburgh, moderator of Common Cause Partnership. Duncan was deposed by bishops in the Episcopal Church in September but immediately named a bishop-at-large in another Anglican province, the Anglican Province of the Southern Cone. He will be the group’s first archbishop and primate of the Anglican Church in North America.
But observers in the Episcopal Church, which has about 2 million members, say the event at an evangelical church at Wheaton College, the same spot nearly 70 years ago where Rev. Billy Graham began his evangelism, does not hold much significance for the rest of the Anglican Communion.
“I do not think Wednesday’s event is as big a deal as the organizers think it is,” said Rev. Ian Douglas of the Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge, Mass. “Yet another threatened line in the sand.”
The new church is the first province to be drawn according to theological and not geographic boundaries — a dramatic departure from Anglican policy and procedure that may not get approval from the Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams or other bodies that normally would give approval to the new province.
“While claiming more conservative tradition on human sexuality and biblical interpretation, their approach is radical and contrary to church polity,” Douglas said.
The new denomination will include four Episcopal dioceses that recently voted to break away from the Episcopal church — Pittsburgh; Ft. Worth, Texas; Quincy, Ill.; and San Joaquin, Calif. However, not all the parishes and Episcopalians in those four dioceses agreed to leave the Episcopal Church.
The new denomination also includes dozens of breakaway parishes in the U.S. and Canada that voted to do the same. The new church also will absorb a handful of other splinter groups that left the Episcopal Church decades ago over theological differences.
One of those, the Reformed Episcopal Church, left the worldwide Anglican Communion more than 130 years ago because Episcopalians in the U.S. reserved communion for those who were baptized. Those who left believed everyone was welcome to receive communion.
Like the Reformed Episcopal Church, the constitution for the new province prescribes use of the original 1662 Book of Common Prayer. The constitution also gives parishes discretion on ordaining women — an “experiment” worth continuing, Duncan said.
The province’s constitution leaves property in the hands of individual parishes, limiting the potential for lawsuits down the line if parishes or dioceses decide to leave. Details such as how marriage and divorce will be handled are expected to be hammered out before the constitution is ratified in June.
Chicago Bishop Jeffrey Lee said he is disappointed by the group’s decision to leave.
“I’m saddened that some members of the Episcopal Church are choosing to affiliate with other parts of the Anglican Communion,” Lee said. “I think we’re impoverished whenever sisters and brothers are not with us at the same table for the same conversation. There’s real regret attached to that for me.”
Chicago Tribune
Copyright (c) 2008, Chicago Tribune



posted December 4, 2008 at 7:29 pm
The bible as an “unchangeable standard”. Um, who are they kidding? Wow, I had no idea so many Americans read Hebrew and Greek.
posted December 4, 2008 at 9:16 pm
The new branch of the Episcopal church will join the ranks of those that think the good book is the “final authority” and the “unchangeable standard”. Really? How do they expain the hundreds of years of translations, copying, etc. that has gone on? That all adds up to “unchangeable?” Oh well, whatever gets it for them.
They will be sure to NOT allow any homosexuals in their churches, as the “good book” says it’s “BAD”. At least they think it says that…their interpretation.
posted December 4, 2008 at 9:33 pm
As a Chicago Tribune subsriber, I am pleased to see that BeliefNet.com picked up the Trib’s article on the subject, which delves deeper than the AP report. However, is it BeliefNet.com’s policy to ignore the reporter’s by-line? I think Manya A. Brachear deserves credit. So, here it is. I think she’s a wonderful reporter on the religion beat, and I for one am glad that the Trib (at least for now) covers religion as an important beat.
posted December 5, 2008 at 4:09 pm
“The move is the most telling sign yet that the debate over the role of gay and lesbian Christians has torn apart the first church to appoint an openly gay bishop.”
and
“Dubbed the Common Cause Partnership, the leaders represent 100,000 Anglicans who believe the 2003 consecration of New Hampshire Bishop V. Gene Robinson, an openly gay man in a long-term relationship, violated the authority of scripture.”
Parts of the article sound like a press release from the new splinter group.
posted December 6, 2008 at 1:45 pm
It does nnmns! It’s like shame, shame, shame, for making us have to leave you people. Violation of the authority of scripture, that was probably misquoted to begin with in the thousands of years between now and then. It is of course much more important than living, breathing humans born of heteosexual mothers and fathers who welcomed these little new souls into the world, and then rejected them after God gave them to them, at least some, and then there is the parents who stand with their children before God and will not stop fighting for them and loving them just as they were born; and will continue to work to see they are as equal as they are.
posted December 6, 2008 at 3:02 pm
It is simply stating the truth, and I can see why pagans, atheist, and some so-called Christians who deny the authority of the Bible would be on the side that is causing the division. This situation is already covered in the word of God (Bible) and it does not come as a surprise to Christians who believe in Jesus the Christ.
posted December 6, 2008 at 5:11 pm
I am reminded of an old Monty Python routine where a “committee” is explaining their rules to a new member. One of the recurring rules was “No Pouftas”. My favorite rule was number 6, “There is no rule number 6″. Anyway, It sounds like they took everything from that other heretical, blasphemous, heathen denomination and simply added a “No Poufta” rule. Silly, like M. Python.
CK
I have not picked up on most of these folks posting here as denigrating you. So why do you feel the need to denigrate others by using phrases like “so-called Christians”. It seems uncalled for and not usually part of your character.
posted December 7, 2008 at 12:23 pm
jest it is the truth backed by the Bible and Jesus’ very words, ‘These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. … Matthew 15:8″ He also warned “I never knew you” Paul went on to talk about “false gospel” there is so much reference to this fact I am surprised you do know what I mean. I in no way mean to denigrate but I will not ignore the teachings of Jesus or the warnings of the Bible.
posted December 7, 2008 at 2:41 pm
In you opinion, the truth is backed by the Bible and JC’ words, cknuck. It is how you interpret the “truth”, and everyone has their own ideas on that as they read the Bible etc. No one has the WHOLE truth….absolutely no one. Everything in the Bible is subject to interpretation…as is most everything one reads.
posted December 8, 2008 at 6:32 am
Faith is a tricky thing. Once someone has it, reason goes out the door.
posted December 8, 2008 at 12:07 pm
Confessoressa,
I have discovered that the people of faith whom I respect the most have also kept a strong hold on their capacity for reason. One without the other is like a pogo stick, dangerous and likely to keep you bouncing in one place.
posted December 8, 2008 at 12:23 pm
Confessoressa, my strong faith has never hurt my reasoning, as Jest said it doesn’t happen to every Christian.
You’re right jestrfyl is you keep jumping in one place on a pogo stick it could be dangerous, your brain may get stuck in one place, or your teeth may even fall out.
posted December 8, 2008 at 7:49 pm
Many think or make this claim or faith or reasoning especially if a person of faith disagrees with their position.