Undeterred by solid Democratic gains in November’s national elections, religious conservatives who oppose abortion are going on the offensive with a new weapon: a sick economy.
In its largest-ever state-based initiative, the Family Research Council (FRC) is contacting every state lawmaker in the country with a plea to eliminate funding for Planned Parenthood, one of the nation’s largest providers of family planning and abortion services.
Their argument is fairly simple: lots of organizations need public money now, but Planned Parenthood — with a $1 billion budget and a $114 million operating surplus — isn’t one of them.
“Planned Parenthood has proven that they don’t need federal or state handouts,” says Tom McClusky, vice president for government affairs at the Washington-based FRC. “During these economic times, when states are rethinking their investments, subsidizing abortion is probably not the kind of thing that they want to be known for.”
Planned Parenthood has long been a favorite target for abortion opponents, who chafe at the $337 million that the organization receives from public sources to help run its 880 clinics nationwide. States are the center of the action because 17 state legislatures permit their funds to be used for abortions. Federal funds, by contrast, can support only non-abortion services, such as counseling and birth control.
Basing the de-funding argument on a dour economy represents a new wrinkle in a long-term strategy, according to Ted Jelen, a political scientist at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, who studies attitudes toward abortion.
Since most Americans aren’t deeply convinced of the moral merits or demerits of abortion, Jelen says, critics of abortion increasingly seek allies by appealing to other value systems — outrage over the grotesque image of a late-term abortion, for example, or now, a belt-tightening eagerness to purge unnecessary spending during an economic crisis.
“Most people are pro-choice under at least some circumstances,”
Jelen said. “So the idea that `maybe we can’t afford this in tough economic times’ might be fairly plausible.”
Planned Parenthood, meanwhile, is tuning up an economic argument of its own.
“Public funding of family planning services is an investment in prevention care that has numerous dividends,” says Tait Sye, spokesperson for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, in an e-mailed statement. “Cutting public funding of family planning is bad public policy, will leave even more women without access to vital health care services, and will lead to increased health care costs for the state.”
FRC recently launched its lawmaker outreach campaign after staffers noticed cash-strapped local governments in Florida, Georgia and Texas cutting funds for Planned Parenthood. If budget concerns could prevail in those locales, activists figured, then maybe the same could happen in statehouses from coast to coast.
Other conservative Christian groups are mobilizing, too. The American Life League (ALL) of Stafford, Va., has re-ordered its political priorities this year to focus primarily on de-funding Planned Parenthood, according to Jim Sedlak, director of the ALL’s Stop Planned Parenthood project. In his view, the GOP’s steep losses in November do not necessarily suggest that Americans have warmed to abortion rights.
“This (election) battle wasn’t about abortion, or pro-life or moral values. This election was all about the economy,” Sedlak said. “I don’t think you can take a message from the election in terms of the moral fight over abortion. … Things are going our way, and this election was an aberration for other reasons.”
Still, anti-abortion activists face logistical and political hurdles. State funding often gets channeled through agencies or local governments, which then may subcontract with Planned Parenthood affiliates for services. That means cutting money for Planned Parenthood isn’t as simple as dropping a single line item in a state budget bill.
“We’re trying to understand exactly how much funding in the Commonwealth of Kentucky is going to Planned Parenthood,” said David Edmunds, policy analyst at the Family Foundation of Kentucky in Lexington. “We have to determine that first before we have any kind of action strategy to try to de-fund it.”
Abortion-rights supporters, meanwhile, recognize they may need to be assertive in order for Planned Parenthood to resist the fierce budget-cutting pressures expected in 2009. To that end, they’re highlighting the importance of maintaining accessibility to Planned Parenthood’s full range of services, especially in hard economic times.
“This economic downturn is going to throw a lot of middle-class women into the `poor’ category,” said Rev. Carlton W. Veazey, president of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice in Washington.
“They’re going to lose their jobs, and they’re going to need these services.”
By G. Jeffrey MacDonald
Religion News Service
Copyright 2009 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.
Beliefnet
Advertisement
posted January 13, 2009 at 8:33 pm
These fundamentalists have no concern whatever for the women and girls and families Planned Parenthood serves. PP does provide abortions in places but it does so much more; health care, education, contraceptive services. And education and contraception availability as well as abortion drive some of these people up the wall.
And unwanted children are more likely to turn into big drains on the public as they strain against the justice system. Money for Planned Parenthood is some of the best spent money in government budgets.
This RNS reporter could have served us better by informing us more on all the services PP provides.
posted January 14, 2009 at 11:13 am
You are right nnmns. They screen for breast cancer, and stds and find many people who need help they can’t afford any place else. Stds are on the rise again, incidently, read this in LA Science, recently.
posted January 14, 2009 at 4:41 pm
… those aren’t “people”, they are blastocysts or zygotes or embryos or fetuses. Please don’t try to confuse bzefs with people.
And you don’t seem very concerned that my tax dollars are being used to fund a useless, indeed highly counterproductive war against my will and it costs actual human lives. Innocent human lives.
posted January 14, 2009 at 6:41 pm
The medical dictionary has definitions of embryo refering to organisms in early stages of development, with an obstetric definition of fetus as ‘The unborn child developing in the uterus–after the embryonic stage, circa age 7 to 8 wks to birth’. Fetal and embryonic are merely stages of development, the same as infant or adolescent.
Personally, I am concerned that our tax dollars were used to initiate an unjust war, yet it would be immoral for us to leave a bloodbath behind us. Seeing as how it was our mess to begin with, then it stands to reason that we should be the ones to clean it up.
posted January 14, 2009 at 9:12 pm
Gee! That’s new…a anti-choice group is once again trying to undermine Planned Parenthood’s services by attempting to get funds stopped.
Since the FRC seems to think the money can be used somewhere else for better purposes, are they going to provide for the unwanted babies that might be born due to lack of or careless use of birth control methods? PP provides needed services to women and those services cost money. Many who use the services of PP can’t afford other options.
posted January 14, 2009 at 9:17 pm
And one other thought….in these economic times, there will be more women who can’t afford one child, never mind yet another child. PP is an organization that can provide, if needed, terminations or better yet, education on birth control, and prevention of STD’s as well as women’s health services.
posted January 15, 2009 at 12:45 pm
exactly! if the gov’t is paying out roughly $4-5/pp patient to prevent abortions and provide preventitive health care and up to $4k/patient for the first year of medical care for a new born without insurance and support for the mother, which do you think is going to have a more positive affect on gov’t's ability to help during the recession?
posted January 15, 2009 at 8:16 pm
Unfortunately, the Family Research Council is spitting in the wind.
Planned Parenthood just paid millions of dollars to buy elections for their candidates.
Those same elected officials are not now going to turn around and bite the hand that feeds them.
posted January 16, 2009 at 5:02 pm
Planned Parenthood is and has been divisive, evil, and underhanded since it’s onset.
I pray to God that they are put out of business.
posted January 16, 2009 at 7:34 pm
Let’s hope Teresa P, that you are never in a position where PP would be the only place that could help you. They do more good than harm….or “evil” or “underhanded” or EVEN “divisive”. Are they a perfect organization? Of course not, but then there is no such thing as a perfect organization. Simple…don’t use them, but fortunately they are there for those women who need advice and health care.