OKLAHOMA CITY (RNS) The Oklahoma Department of Corrections’ refusal to allow a Christian ministry access to send Bibles, books about Jesus Christ and other religious materials to inmates has sparked a federal lawsuit.
Wingspread Christian Ministries, headquartered in Prairie Grove, Ark., and operated by Illinois-based Evangelists for Christ Inc., filed the lawsuit Wednesday (Feb. 11) in U.S. District Court in Muskogee.
Prison restrictions on prisoners’ correspondence violate the First and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and Oklahoma’s Religious Freedom Act, the 12-page lawsuit petition claims.
“Restricting Wingspread’s freedom of speech and religion is not only harmful to our constitutional rights, it is also very harmful to those within prison walls in need of spiritual sustenance,” said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, a Charlottesville, Va.-based civil liberties organization, which represents the plaintiffs.
Neville Massie, executive assistant to Oklahoma Corrections Director Justin Jones, said the department would not comment on pending litigation.
Wingspread sends similar religious materials to prisoners in Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, New York and Texas but “has not encountered restrictions upon and impediments to its ministry similar to those encountered in Oklahoma,” the lawsuit states.
According to the suit, Oklahoma prison regulations mandate that “all orders for publications will be made directly to the publisher of the material or to a legitimate bookstore.”
The regulation does not allow a ministry to send Bibles or other religious materials; only a publisher, bookstore or book dealer may do so, according to the plaintiffs. Wingspread said it also has tried to send money orders worth $15 to $20 to indigent or mentally ill prisoners during the Christmas season, only to have them returned by prison officials. The ministry said it also was informed that while individuals could write letters to inmates, ministries could not.
“Because Wingspread’s ministry involves personal communication with prisoners and building a personal relationship with the prisoner, correspondence through the mail is crucial to the pursuit and success of this ministry,” plaintiffs’ attorney Joseph Clark wrote in the petition.
By Bobby Ross Jr.
Copyright 2009 Religion News Service.All rights reserved.No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



posted February 13, 2009 at 5:40 pm
I wonder how the “Christians” would feel if Buddhists wanted “access” to send information about Buddha, Buddhism and its principles, and other religious materials?
I wonder how the “Christians” would feel if Muslims wanted “access” to send information about Allah, Islam and its principles, and other religious materials?
I wonder how the “Christians” would feel if Wiccans wanted “access” to send information about Gaia, Wicca and its principles, and other religious materials?
I wonder how the “Christians” would feel if Hindus wanted “access” to send information about Vishnu, Hinduism and its principles, and other religious materials?
I wonder how the “Christians” would feel if Taoists wanted “access” to send information about Taoism and its principles, and other religious materials?
Etc.
I know, it would be anathema, but it would also be TRUE “religious freedom”. Until that happens, America is still going to be mocked as ‘Jesusland’ by countries that actually have freedom of religion.
posted February 13, 2009 at 7:38 pm
Oklahoma treats their prisoners like they are in prison. Bad joke!
This Ministry, and any bodies ministry, such as no name listed above, should be allowed to send the prisoners their books. Freedom of religon means freedom of religion and every state should pratise what is in our constitution. Our Constitution should be respected, as in equality for all it’s citizens, not just in some states, and not others. Dos our Constitution only apply in little snitches and snatches, here and there? Looks as though it does. I hope that President Obama will finally see that all Americans are equal under our Constitution, be it religon, Sexual-Orientation, or anything else. These nit-picking arguments are a waste of time and we could be discussing more important things in America if we just are all on the same page, “Being Equal under our Constitution”.
posted February 13, 2009 at 8:19 pm
Your Name, the Nation of Islam is VERY active in prison ministry. I’m not sure about Buddhists, Taoists, Hindus, or Wiccans but I imagine they could do the same if they so choose (if they’re not doing so already).
From my limited perspective, the Oklahoma Department of Corrections seems to be somewhat anal retentive on this issue. I’m not aware that Christian inmates are taking over the drug racket or causing any other increase in criminal activity. If spirituality, even specific to a certain religion, gives these men (and women) peace of mind and keeps them out of trouble, then it may be in the best interests of everyone concerned to allow it.
posted February 13, 2009 at 10:07 pm
Guess the OK prison system is afraid some of the inmates “finding Jesus”, having a sudden conversion!
A few other states don’t seem to have a problem with religious materials being sent/brought to inmates. I’m guessing that OK must also restrict other religions from sending their materials? (Jews, RCC,etc.?)
Guess things will be worked out. Expect there will be some prisoners still there to get the “Good News” when/if the group wins it’s suit.
posted February 14, 2009 at 12:17 am
It seems, according to the information in the article, that the issue is not with religion, but with the way a religious group tries to work. Perhaps this group could modify their work to meet the strictures of the Corrections Dept. It can’t be too difficult to get a publisher or bookstore approved. And it would seem that sending personal letters rather than tracts or pamphlets would meet their goals better. The need for control and restricted access seems prudent for prison safety. But it also seems that both sides might benefit more if each were willing to think a little more creatively.
posted February 14, 2009 at 8:33 am
OK has a high rate of religiosity so I doubt they are concerned about conversions. Possibly they are worried about what might come in with/inside books. Possibly they figure if they allow Christian stuff they have to allow eg Muslim stuff. Maybe the prison chaplains don’t want competition. Just guessing. If this goes to trial maybe we’ll find out.
posted February 14, 2009 at 1:22 pm
speaking from a perspective of someone who was imprisoned back in the civil rights era prisons are hard and cruel places to be sometimes rightfully but mostly just overkill broad brushed hard. Christianity has done more for rehabilitation and changing people then the prison system itself. It not only gives a way to cope with the harshness of prison life but it is an encourager for change.
posted February 16, 2009 at 9:24 am
Yours is not the first ministry to run up against this wall. DOC will win on procedure (materials coming directly from the manufacture, etc.) but they crossed the line rejecting communication stating, “only from individuals – not from ministries.” You’ll win on that point. Ministries are people deticated to human rehabilitation.
My prison ministry from a neighboring state ran into much of the same as yours (rejected tracks, etc…) until I moved to Oklahoma and married a lifer. This gave me the opening I needed to send in tracks, etc. I still, however, have to send books and magazines directly from the book stores. I never sent in money. It’s bad policy for ministries to send in money. Most chaplins will deliver a bible, etc. if you send one to them for a particular inmate, but sending cash is never a good idea. Cash creates more problems than it resolves. Other inmates may begin to force the inmate to provide this and that, etc… the inmate may give in to old addictions, etc… If you are concerned about a particular inmate, communicate with the chaplain.
I’ve been married into the system now for two decades. Where there’s a will there’s a way. Blessings,
Jean