Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

Atheists’ ‘De-Baptism’ Forms Snapped Up in Britain

posted by akornfeld | 5:36pm Thursday April 2, 2009

London — A secular organization in Britain that backs an atheist ad campaign on London’s buses is now producing “certificates of de-baptism” for people wishing to renounce their Christian faith — and claims it is getting thousands of takers.
The National Secular Society says more than 100,000 ex-worshippers have downloaded the de-baptism certificates from its Web site, and that thousands of others have ordered up parchment versions at about $4 a copy.
The NSS Web site (www.secularism.org.uk) advertises the certificates this way: “Liberate yourself from the Original Mumbo-Jumbo that liberated you from the Original Sin you never had.”
The British initiative is among the latest in a series of atheist-oriented campaigns in Europe. Italy’s Union of Rationalist Atheists and Agnostics, for instance, sponsored a nationwide “De-Baptism Day” last October to encourage Roman Catholics to renounce their church affiliation.
In Spain, a high court ruled that Manuel Blat, of Valencia, could have his baptism records erased under data protection laws.
Terry Sanderson, president of the NSS, cites Pope Benedict XVI’s recent contention that the use of condoms does not help combat the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa as an example of church stridency that is leading to backlashes such as the “de-baptism” certificates.
“The Catholic Church is so politically active at the moment that I think that is where the hostility is coming from,” Sanderson told the French news agency AFP. “In Catholic countries, there is a very strong feeling of wanting to punish the Church by leaving it.”
In Britain, the NSS chief said, “the fact that people are willing to pay for the (de-baptism) parchments shows how seriously they are taking them.”

By Al Webb
Religion News Service
Copyright 2009 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



Previous Posts

Did Rastafarian spokesman Bob Marley become a Christian on his deathbed?
Three decades after the death of legendary Jamaican musician Bob Marley, an intriguing story is circulating. “What most people don't know, and many try to cover up, is the fact that Bob Marley converted to Christianity in 1980,” proclaims an article that has appeared on a number of websites.

posted 4:52:03pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »

Are U.S. colleges hostile to Christian students?
Are Christian kids on U.S. college campuses facing open hostility and discrimination because of their faith? Supreme Court Justice Justice Samuel Alito seems to think so. So does U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Daniel Ripple – and human rights attorneys Gregory Baylor and Jordan Lorenc

posted 12:18:26pm Feb. 09, 2012 | read full post »

Building a Temple to Atheism
When I say temple, you think religious place of worship right?  When I say atheist, you think one that believes there is no God.  Stay with me now, when I say religion, don’t you think about the worship of God?  Before this blog becomes a full blown say what you are thinking game, let me get to

posted 5:49:11pm Feb. 03, 2012 | read full post »

Romney Nabs Second Primary Victory in Florida
"I stand ready to lead this party and to lead our nation.  My leadership will end the Obama era and begin a new era of American prosperity," Romney said in his victory speech in Tampa Tuesday night.  Romney who won all 50 of Florida’s convention delegates is the only Republican candidate to have

posted 5:15:58pm Feb. 02, 2012 | read full post »

Science Whiz Gets a New Home
17 year-old Samantha Garvey made national headlines when she was selected as an Intel Science Talent Search semi-finalist—one of 300 across the country vying for the top prize, a $100,000 science scholarship.  It was Garvey’s home life that tugged at the heartstrings of people all over the coun

posted 11:53:07am Jan. 30, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(37)
post a comment
nnmns

posted April 2, 2009 at 5:41 pm


Good for them! This is a very encouraging sign.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted April 2, 2009 at 6:29 pm


I can understand them not wanting to follow the Popes dictation, but why leave being Christian? A lot of these people have bought these parchments just to look at them and show them around, as well as some actually de-baptizing themselves. Four dollars each is a souvenir.



report abuse
 

Bob

posted April 2, 2009 at 6:36 pm


This is just as dumb as claiming you can become a virgin again.



report abuse
 

Confessoressa

posted April 2, 2009 at 6:40 pm


This is a great idea, especially if documentation could mean that churches could no longer count children baptised as members once they grow up and find out they really don’t believe it anyway. I’m sure I’m still on the rolls somewhere.
How many people are counted as being part of a religion has a great impact on politics, does it not? I guess that’s why the quiverfull people do what they do; pop em out, get em baptised and you’ve done your duty.
I once nannied for a Catholic with 5 children. When I asked her if she wanted to attend church with me on Sunday she said, “I gave God 5 children; I’ve don’t my duty”.
Let’s be accurate about numbers. I’ll bet less than one out of every 10 Christians doesn’t actually believe in many of Christianity’s historical teachings. That’s not to say that those who do should not be respected; I just think we should get the numbers right.
People leave being Christian because they don’t believe the tenets of it.



report abuse
 

Bob

posted April 2, 2009 at 6:42 pm


“…why leave being Christian?”
It makes it easier to engage in questionable behavior when you don’t have someone hinting that it may be wrong.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted April 2, 2009 at 6:49 pm


OK, that’s just totally cool, IMO! Makes their lack of need for an organization/religion that they no longer feel a need for, humorously “official”.



report abuse
 

Bob

posted April 2, 2009 at 6:52 pm


Confessoressa,
As to “getting the numbers right”, the government looks to census forms and looks to see what box you checked. They don’t ask each church etc. for their records. So appearing on the old rolls of a church record doesn’t mean much that way.
As for that Catholic you worked for, if she was refusing to go to Mass, then she was NOT doing her duty as a Catholic. We’re required to go every Sunday. You can refer her to the Cathechism on that point.
On the other hand, she might just have been turning down the invitation to your church in particular, which would be understandable. When someone invites you, it’s hard to know whether you’ll end up at a solid, mainline Protestant denomination where the basic theology is the same, or whether you’ll end up someplace like a Unitarian church which is a free-for-all.



report abuse
 

Bob

posted April 2, 2009 at 6:57 pm


I wonder if I can have myself “de-Beliefnet-ed”.
Worth a shot, I think.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted April 2, 2009 at 7:33 pm


“It makes it easier to engage in questionable behavior when you don’t have someone hinting that it may be wrong.”
Pretty snide there Bob. And that hinting doesn’t seem to have made any difference to the hoards of Christians in our jails, not to mention the wealthier ones who should be but aren’t.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted April 2, 2009 at 7:43 pm


Bob, a lot gets accomplished in those Unitarian “free for alls”! But guess what? Called tolerance for others beliefs…and opinions under the same church roof…with no threat of Hell or damnation. There are many, many areas of agreement under those roofs, however. Personal experience has proven that to me many times.



report abuse
 

Charles Cosimano

posted April 2, 2009 at 11:10 pm


But it is so much more fun to engage in questionable behavior when you know that the folks questioning it can’t do a thing about it.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted April 2, 2009 at 11:18 pm


Do you mean “questionable” or “illegal”? Law enforcement can do a lot about illegal behavior and sometimes they do.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted April 3, 2009 at 1:25 am


O great, gum up a perfectly good dis-belief — WITH PAPERWORK!! To whom would you show this document. Is it a printed excuse for not going to church when company is in town? It seems sort of like those backseat drivers licenses. Cute, amusing, and ….



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted April 3, 2009 at 7:02 am


j, nothing is real if it’s not in triplicate.



report abuse
 

Confessoressa

posted April 3, 2009 at 10:42 am


Bob,
I wasn’t talking about the government census but rather the individual church claims as to membership; they don’t base that on the census.
I’m quite aware of what is required by the Catholic Church and the catechism, being the daughter of a man who spent his 20′s in a monastery and a mother who spent her 20′s in a convent, and having a brother who is a Catholic theologian, and attending Catholic school from preschool through college. My point was that most Catholics do not agree with the basic tenets of the church and it would be nice to have that represented in the numbers. Perhaps then the media would stop paying so much attention to the Pope.
Forgive me, but it doesn’t appear that you are paying much attention to the news articles or the comments you are commenting on.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted April 3, 2009 at 12:17 pm


There are different categories of hate this one fits the category of “dumb hate” its surprising to the numbers of followers something like this can generate.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted April 3, 2009 at 12:33 pm


‘this one fits the category of “dumb hate”‘
What’s that, and who or what’s being hated, cknuck?



report abuse
 

Karen Brown

posted April 3, 2009 at 4:58 pm


Umm.. buying a certificate, and filling in the blanks to denote, in a rather pseudo-official way that they are no longer Christians is a form of ‘hate’?
I would guess that, then, any time anyone joins a group and notes that they are no longer member of alternative ones are expressing hate as well?
Seems that ‘hate’ is an emotion that’s gone through a serious downgrade.



report abuse
 

Mordred08

posted April 3, 2009 at 8:25 pm


Bob: “It makes it easier to engage in questionable behavior when you don’t have someone hinting that it may be wrong.”
Absolutely true. I must have robbed a dozen banks after I stopped caring whether some all-powerful being was going to torment me forever because I wasn’t 100% sure of his existence.
Wait a minute. I didn’t rob banks. I just slept in on Sunday. Real questionable behavior there.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted April 4, 2009 at 12:49 pm


It is a direct attack aimed at Christians, a specific religion not religion in general, we believe in baptism so yes it is a hateful organized religious effort, they stopped short of requiring the signature to be in blood.
They are proselytizing their beliefs, Jehovah Witnesses don’t require a signature.
The good new is that it it has no effect on salvation, anyone who would sign such a document obviously has no relationship with Christ.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted April 4, 2009 at 1:07 pm


cknuck, it’s not aimed at all Christians, not even all that many Christians and certainly not enough Christians, just those Christians who no longer consider themselves Christian. Since you patently do consider yourself Christian I don’t see why it’s got you all upset. Bad day proselytizing?



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted April 4, 2009 at 2:25 pm


“……hateful organized religious effort? cknuck, I really don’t think there is any hatred involved. I’m not a Christian, and I don’t carry hate around for those that are. My whole immediate family are Christians…(except my kids, and daughter in law and husband). It’s just a group offering a “service” if you will. People have Baptism certificates…why not de-baptism certificates? If a person is no longer Christian, then it makes no difference if they still have or don’t have their certificate saying that at one point in their lives (probably when they were infants) they were baptised…I was, and since I was an infant, I had no say in the matter.
Oh, that signature in blood? That’s probably another whole process, a special de-baptism certificate for those willing to shed blood for it. :o ) And yes, it just makes since to say that perhaps a person who signs that certificate has no relationship with Christ, however that isn’t necessarily true. It just may not be the same relationship that you have or someone else has.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted April 4, 2009 at 3:36 pm


I consider my relationship to Christ to be the same as my relationship to the Easter Bunny and just a bit short of my relationship to the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Happily I never had a relationship with any of them formalized so I don’t have any need to de-formalize one.
Peace.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted April 4, 2009 at 5:25 pm


nnmns I don’t usually have time to proselytize, I don’t solicit folk with billboards or bus adds, I do serve people daily however so no I don’t have bad days proselytizing I’m sure much to your chagrin. So to me the fact that this group’s purpose for being organize is to entice people to sign certificates of de-baptizing is a confrontation with Christians.
By the way the whole “flying spaghetti monster thing, I know it comes from one of your hero’s but it’s pretty old and weak.
pagan I know you are not a Christian but you insist on speaking for them and all of the personal references makes you an expert but there may be something you have missed. I’ll just leave it like that, lol.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted April 4, 2009 at 8:18 pm


Believe me when I tell you…I’m missing nothing, cknuck. Had 17 years of experience…that was enough. I saw the “light’ after that.
Never claimed or claim now to be an “expert” any more than you are.



report abuse
 

Mordred08

posted April 4, 2009 at 11:32 pm


“It is a direct attack aimed at Christians, a specific religion not religion in general, we believe in baptism so yes it is a hateful organized religious effort, they stopped short of requiring the signature to be in blood.”
Wait a minute. My understanding is that nobody’s “required” to sign anything, so maybe you should take it down a notch or two. And I love how you call it a direct attack towards your faith. That’s because it reminds me of the fundamentalist Muslims who call leaving their religion an attack and respond to said “attack” with threats of (and sometimes actual) violence. Signing a piece of paper that says they don’t want to be in your club anymore does not mean atheists hate you or your religion. It just means they don’t want to be a part of it, and in Western civilization, that’s their right.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted April 5, 2009 at 4:11 pm


Mordred you bring an important point let’s see these faithful atheists put up adds for Muslims to turn away from their faith. I don’t think they are as courageous as they are committed to Christians so it’s not so much true atheism as it is opportunist.



report abuse
 

Mordred08

posted April 5, 2009 at 4:54 pm


cknuck: “Mordred you bring an important point”
Which you ignored to play the good old “at least we’re not the Muslims” card.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted April 5, 2009 at 11:17 pm


I think there are enough people lost, lonely, and/or afraid in the world that we do not need to rob from each other’s membership in churches, denominations, or religions. Evangelism was not intended to be a competitive sport. There is enough to do so that I don;t feel a need to make someone else feel miserable because of what I believe.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted April 5, 2009 at 11:49 pm


Mordred are we on the same planet I did not play any card but that the organization is too afraid to take on Muslims in the same way as they assaulted Christians with billboard or bus ads, pointing out it is aimed at Christians alone, please try to keep up and pay attention before you accuse.



report abuse
 

Mordred08

posted April 6, 2009 at 2:14 am


cknuck, give me a break. Christians are no more “assaulted” by “God doesn’t exist” billboards than I am by “Marriage = Man + Woman” bumper stickers. Are they annoying as all get out? You bet, because I know I’d catch hell if I expressed the opposite opinion in public. But I don’t claim I’m being “assaulted” by them; I reserve my anger for more serious matters, like the government-approved discrimination said bumper stickers support.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted April 6, 2009 at 5:02 am


“There is enough to do so that I don;t feel a need to make someone else feel miserable because of what I believe.”
The world, and Christianity would be immensely better off if all the preachers took that view.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted April 6, 2009 at 2:05 pm


Mordred even though you might think you have the right to speak for Christians you are not correct in your thinking. But you did do a good job in dodging my comment about this group not having the courage to take on Muslims or Jews but just seeking to target Christians.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted April 6, 2009 at 2:53 pm


Maybe the group will target the Muslims and Jews next,cknuck…in another ad campaign.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted April 6, 2009 at 4:01 pm


I think asking them to target Muslims while they live in a Muslim country under Sharia is doubly unrealistic because of the penalties for all involved. I don’t know what the situation is for Jews in Israel but I presume it’s not nearly as threatening. But cknuck do you really expect them to jump around the globe putting their signs here and there? Maybe they eventually will but they have to start someplace. Wait ten years and if their signs are in lots of Christian cities but no Jewish, etc. cities then you’ll have a leg to stand on.



report abuse
 

Mordred08

posted April 6, 2009 at 7:55 pm


cknuck: “But you did do a good job in dodging my comment about this group not having the courage to take on Muslims or Jews”
I didn’t see a need to respond. The notion that atheists don’t criticize Muslims is laughable. Besides, this campaign is about baptisms. Do Muslims even have baptisms? I don’t know, I’ll admit it. Do you know?
And as for taking on the Jews, who really has the courage to criticize them in public these days except for the fundamentalist Muslims? And they don’t exactly strike me as being good at rational debate.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted April 6, 2009 at 8:56 pm


nnmns quote “Wait ten years and if their signs are in lots of Christian cities but no Jewish, etc. cities then you’ll have a leg to stand on.”
You do realize how that statement sounds? Or do you?



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.