Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

Israel Says It Won’t Apologize for Gaza War

posted by nsymmonds | 5:33pm Wednesday May 6, 2009

UNITED NATIONS – Israeli President Shimon Peres on Wednesday called a U.N. investigation accusing Israel of recklessness during the war in Gaza “outrageous” and said the Jewish state will not apologize for defending its citizens against Hamas missile attacks.
He conceded that the Israeli military made some mistakes – as all armies do during war.
Nonetheless, Peres said he thinks chances for Mideast peace “were improved” following his meeting in Washington on Tuesday with President Barack Obama.
The U.N. inquiry focused on nine attacks on U.N. schools, a health clinic and the world body’s Gaza headquarters and found that Israeli weapons were responsible for seven of them. It accused Israel of gross negligence and recklessness and said the U.N. should demand compensation for property damage and for those who were killed and injured, and an acknowledgment from Israel that statements it made about several attacks were untrue.
“We think it’s outrageous. We shall never accept it. We don’t think that we have to apologize because we have the right to defend the lives of our children and women,” Peres told reporters after meeting U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to convey Israel’s anger about the board of inquiry’s findings.
“We don’t accept one word of what the board writes,” he said. “They were unfair. They were one-sided.”
But Peres said Israel is considering compensation and the government has appointed a group to study how to handle it.
“I think the results will come very soon,” he said.
Israel launched a 22-day ground and air offensive in Gaza on Dec. 27 in an effort to halt years of Hamas rocket fire and arms smuggling into the Palestinian territory, which is controlled by the Islamic militant group. The offensive caused an estimated $2 billion in damage and killed nearly 1,300 Palestinians, including hundreds of civilians, Palestinian
officials have said. At least 13 Israelis died.
Peres claimed the U.N. inquiry went beyond its mandate of investigating the attacks on U.N. property and focused instead on “the whole situation in Gaza.” Israel would not have participated if it had known the scope, he said.
“We’re outraged because they didn’t mention Hamas,” he said. “If Hamas didn’t shoot, there wouldn’t be a single problem.”
Israel’s armed forces conducted their own investigation of the Gaza war and found no misconduct.
Peres said the country didn’t overstep in its use of white phosphorous, an incendiary substance whose use was criticized by the inquiry. He added that Israel never targeted civilians and made 250,000 phone calls to warn people he said were being used as “human shields” to leave their houses before Israeli attacks.
Security Council diplomats said the U.N. report would be discussed by members during closed consultations on Thursday, when Libya was expected to circulate a draft resolution on its findings.
Peres’ visit to the U.N. came ahead of Monday’s ministerial meeting of the Security Council aimed at giving new impetus to the Middle East peace process.
Peres was upbeat about his meeting with Obama.
“I was very much encouraged by president Obama, by his attitude,” he said. “I think the chances for peace were improved.”
Associated Press – May 6, 2009
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Previous Posts

Did Obama mean to pick a fight with America’s two largest denominations?
In an election year of all times, why would President Barack Obama choose to infuriate both America’s Catholics and Southern Baptists? “It seems that Obama, in a classic act of hubris, has created the means of his own destruction,” writes conservative commentator J.R. Dunn in the American T

posted 4:42:46pm Feb. 13, 2012 | read full post »

Did Rastafarian spokesman Bob Marley become a Christian on his deathbed?
Three decades after the death of legendary Jamaican musician Bob Marley, an intriguing story is circulating. “What most people don't know, and many try to cover up, is the fact that Bob Marley converted to Christianity in 1980,” proclaims an article that has appeared on a number of websites.

posted 4:52:03pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »

Are U.S. colleges hostile to Christian students?
Are Christian kids on U.S. college campuses facing open hostility and discrimination because of their faith? Supreme Court Justice Justice Samuel Alito seems to think so. So does U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Daniel Ripple – and human rights attorneys Gregory Baylor and Jordan Lorenc

posted 12:18:26pm Feb. 09, 2012 | read full post »

Building a Temple to Atheism
When I say temple, you think religious place of worship right?  When I say atheist, you think one that believes there is no God.  Stay with me now, when I say religion, don’t you think about the worship of God?  Before this blog becomes a full blown say what you are thinking game, let me get to

posted 5:49:11pm Feb. 03, 2012 | read full post »

Romney Nabs Second Primary Victory in Florida
"I stand ready to lead this party and to lead our nation.  My leadership will end the Obama era and begin a new era of American prosperity," Romney said in his victory speech in Tampa Tuesday night.  Romney who won all 50 of Florida’s convention delegates is the only Republican candidate to have

posted 5:15:58pm Feb. 02, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(6)
post a comment
cknuck

posted May 6, 2009 at 6:47 pm


When it is said that they killed 1300 people that is a conservative estimate and later it is casually mentioned that 13 Israelis were killed. That amounts to murder, a death ratio of 100 to 1. It is horrible that a world would stand by and allow those types of numbers. I saw a video of a Israeli jet bomb a truck with his family and crop in in it. Just that one incident turned my stomach but multiple it by 100 and what you have is no less than murder. If we can’t get the militants then kill all of the people.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted May 6, 2009 at 8:14 pm


“If Hamas didn’t shoot, there wouldn’t be a single problem.”
Or Israel.
“Israel never targeted civilians and made 250,000 phone calls to warn people he said were being used as “human shields” to leave their houses before Israeli attacks.”
Might be hard to do if you are being used as a shield.
The fact is, Israel used brutal, way disproportional force on civilians who had nothing to do with the rocketeers. They have earned the world’s lack of respect but by using our weapons to do this and abusing our friendship they have also spread that disrespect to us.
Our one-sided, uncritical support of Israel has cost us immensely. The very best thing we can do is get out of the Middle East; cut off aid to Israel, Egypt, Jordan. We owe it to Palestine to help them out for a while but with the Republican recession going on we won’t send what we owe them.



report abuse
 

Scott R.

posted May 6, 2009 at 9:27 pm


And if the Pals were killing your children, I guess you would just offer them up.
Oh wait – you don’t have Jewish children.



report abuse
 

Mordred08

posted May 6, 2009 at 10:56 pm


I’m not a military strategy expert and I don’t claim to be, but surely there must be some kind of median between “bomb the hell out of everything” and “just surrender to the terrorists”.
Scott R., I have no children, Jewish or otherwise. But if I did, and a group of PalESTINIANS did attack or kill them, I would like to believe that I would not succumb to hatred for all Palestinians. I suppose that makes me a Nazi to you. Fine. Believe what you will.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted May 6, 2009 at 11:11 pm


I believe a lot more Palestinian children have been killed than Israeli children.
And for sure a lot more Palestinian land stolen.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted May 7, 2009 at 10:38 am


This is starting to play out like 1 Samuel and beyond. Who is the Saul in this modern scenario? Will there be a David to rise and unify the country? Where is Samuel and why have we not heard from him. And will there be a Nathan upon whom Samuel’s mantle can be placed?
NBC tried to bring this saga up to date, but I afraid that the modern political events have trumped their own version of the drama. I enjoyed the show “Kings”, but this is becoming a slo-mo melodrama or political intrigue all by itself.
“Saul has slain his thousands, David his ten thousands” How will that play out today?



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.