Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News

Judge Rules Teen Must Be Treated for Cancer Despite Religious Objections

posted by nsymmonds | 5:21pm Friday May 15, 2009

MINNEAPOLIS – A 13-year-old Minnesota boy with cancer must resume medical treatment to save his life, despite religious and other objections by his family – unless it already is too late, a Brown County District Court judge ruled Friday.
Daniel Hauser must have a chest X-ray by next Tuesday, when Judge John Rodenberg will learn if the boy’s Hodgkin’s lymphoma has spread, the ruling said.
“Daniel Hauser is a child in need of protection,” Rodenberg wrote, noting that five medical doctors agreed on the recommended treatment.
An attorney for the Hausers said the family will comply for now but is considering an appeal.
“The Hausers believe that the injection of chemotherapy into Danny Hauser amounts to an assault upon his body, and torture when it occurs over a long period of time,” attorney Calvin Johnson said in a written statement. “They believe that it is against the spiritual law to invade the consciousness of another person without their permission. Danny feels healthy, and is anxious to continue on with his present course of healing.”
County Attorney James Olson, who petitioned for the court’s intervention, said the judge’s decision “gets things started.” But even with the X-ray, doctors may not be able to offer a prognosis for Daniel by Tuesday’s hearing, he said, and the judge may require more reports or hearings before issuing additional orders.
In a 58-page ruling issued Friday morning, Rodenberg said the boy should remain in the custody of his parents, Anthony and Colleen Hauser of Sleepy Eye, Minn., “provided that the parents get the chest X-ray” and, if chemotherapy is ordered, choose an oncologist to provide the medical care.
Minnesota law requires parents to provide children with “medically necessary care,” and providing “complementary and alternative health care” is not sufficient,” the opinion said.
If the Legislature should reconsider those laws, the judge said, “I am confident that I join all of the others involved in this matter in hoping, and indeed in praying, that Daniel Hauser lives to testify at that hearing.”
However, “this matter … involves a 13-year-old child who has only a rudimentary understanding at best of the risks and benefits of chemotherapy … He does not believe he is very ill currently. The fact is that he is very ill currently,” the judge wrote.
“It is possible that (it) may already be ‘too late,”’ the judge wrote. “The court will not order chemotherapy if Daniel’s previously favorable prognosis no longer pertains,” said the order, posted Friday on the Minnesota state courts Web site, www.mncourts.gov.
At a May 7 visit with his doctor, Daniel showed symptoms that indicate his tumor may have grown, the judge noted.
The judge said that “medical neglect as defined by Minnesota law most definitely occurred” during two recent doctors visits when a chest X-ray was recommended, and refused by the parents, to see if the lymphoma had spread.
He wrote that Colleen Hauser testified “that if Daniel’s condition worsens, she would again consider chemotherapy. Without the chest X-ray that was recommend … it is hard to understand how she would have any idea whether the … tumor is or is not increasing in size.”
Daniel Hauser was diagnosed in January with Hodgkin’s lymphoma, but the Hausers stopped their son’s chemotherapy and radiation after one treatment in February and began substituting alternative care.
His doctors then notified child protection officials, prompting Brown County Attorney James Olson to file a petition asking the court to order the boy into treatment.
Daniel lives with his parents and seven brothers and sisters on a farm near Sleepy Eye, Minn.
At last week’s court hearing in New Ulm, cancer specialists from Children’s Hospitals & Clinics of Minnesota and the Mayo Clinic testified that Daniel had a 90 percent chance of surviving with chemotherapy and radiation, but likely will die within five years without it.
The Hausers argued that the state was trampling on their rights to medical and religious freedom, citing their membership in a Native American religious group, the Nemenhah, which advocates natural healing.
Daniel submitted a formal affidavit stating that he was a Nemenhah medicine man and church elder, and that “I have made the decision to disobey any order to have me surrender to any medical treatment involving self-destruction and death, including chemotherapy.”
Colleen Hauser testified that she was trying to “starve” her son’s tumor with natural healing methods, such as herbs and ionized water, that she had learned about on the Internet.
The Hausers’ lawyer, Calvin Johnson, argued that chemotherapy itself could kill Daniel, and that forcing the boy into treatment would be unconscionable.
“This trial is the act of two loving parents who will go to any length to save their child from assault and torture,” he wrote in his closing argument. Just as doctors must ask for consent before treating patients, he said, patients have the right to refuse.
“The point is simple: The Hausers have elected forms of alternative health care that they believe to be more effective and more beneficial than those recommended by the cancer industry,” he wrote. “Here, we are dealing with a mature 13-year-old boy whose wishes align with those of his parents.”
But Olson, the county attorney, and Daniel’s court-appointed guardian, Shiree Oliver, both argued that the boy has been endangered by his parents’ actions.
“Colleen and Anthony Hauser have a right to raise their children. But they do not have any recognized constitutional right to let their son die from a curable disease,” wrote Thomas Sinas, an attorney for the boy’s guardian.
Sinas argued that Daniel’s own testimony, in a closed session with the judge, showed that he’s not mature enough to make his own medical decisions.
“Daniel, tragically, cannot read,” Sinas wrote in his closing argument. “He was not able to read the affidavit he supposedly affirmed.” He noted that Daniel’s doctors testified that he did not appear to understand the severity of his illness. “Daniel’s only source of information about his disease is his parents.”
Olson argued that Daniel has been “medically neglected,” and that his medical condition may have deteriorated because of the delay in seeking treatment. “Time is of the essence,” he wrote.

Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News – May 15, 2009
(c)2009, Star Tribune (Minneapolis). Distributed by Mclatchy-Tribune News Service.



Previous Posts

Did Rastafarian spokesman Bob Marley become a Christian on his deathbed?
Three decades after the death of legendary Jamaican musician Bob Marley, an intriguing story is circulating. “What most people don't know, and many try to cover up, is the fact that Bob Marley converted to Christianity in 1980,” proclaims an article that has appeared on a number of websites.

posted 4:52:03pm Feb. 10, 2012 | read full post »

Are U.S. colleges hostile to Christian students?
Are Christian kids on U.S. college campuses facing open hostility and discrimination because of their faith? Supreme Court Justice Justice Samuel Alito seems to think so. So does U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Daniel Ripple – and human rights attorneys Gregory Baylor and Jordan Lorenc

posted 12:18:26pm Feb. 09, 2012 | read full post »

Building a Temple to Atheism
When I say temple, you think religious place of worship right?  When I say atheist, you think one that believes there is no God.  Stay with me now, when I say religion, don’t you think about the worship of God?  Before this blog becomes a full blown say what you are thinking game, let me get to

posted 5:49:11pm Feb. 03, 2012 | read full post »

Romney Nabs Second Primary Victory in Florida
"I stand ready to lead this party and to lead our nation.  My leadership will end the Obama era and begin a new era of American prosperity," Romney said in his victory speech in Tampa Tuesday night.  Romney who won all 50 of Florida’s convention delegates is the only Republican candidate to have

posted 5:15:58pm Feb. 02, 2012 | read full post »

Science Whiz Gets a New Home
17 year-old Samantha Garvey made national headlines when she was selected as an Intel Science Talent Search semi-finalist—one of 300 across the country vying for the top prize, a $100,000 science scholarship.  It was Garvey’s home life that tugged at the heartstrings of people all over the coun

posted 11:53:07am Jan. 30, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(10)
post a comment
Garry Dumas

posted May 15, 2009 at 7:21 pm


These people should be allowed to persue any and all methods to help their child that they feel doesn’t go against their religious beliefs. There are natural remedies for most everything out there that work the problem is “Big Brother” in conjunction with “Mother Pharm” is seeing to it that these remedies and yes in some cases, cures, are done away with and or persecuted out of existance, Cheerios anyone? all for the betterment of the Fatherland and his wallet.
Some day, we will wake up, hopefully before it is too late and all our freedoms are those things mentioned in the dark to our children and our grandchildren, “Shhhhh, QUiet now. When we were little we could play those games and we had hundreds of different cereals, and drinks, and foods. Shhhhhh. Now drink your Government vitamin enhanced synthetic cow’s milk and go to sleep, you have to go to your indoctination classes in the morning.”
Baaaa, Baaaaa



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted May 15, 2009 at 7:24 pm


This goes to show it’s not just certain fundamentalist Christians who’ll deny their own children what’s needed to save their lives.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted May 15, 2009 at 8:07 pm


I have sympathy for this family, they are so embedded in their religion they can’t listen to five medical doctors that have explained the consequences of Hodgekins disease and how it plays out. I hope it isn’t too late and that the child can be saved by proven treatment.



report abuse
 

rmcq

posted May 16, 2009 at 2:09 am


In the word’s of the immortal Dr. Gregory House;”These parents are idiots”
Before their son had cancer they were practising Roman Catholics.
The leader of their new faith group was convicted of fraud in two states.
They told him he was an elder and medicine man without him knowing what that means.
Instead of seeking a trained naturalpathic professional they looked on the internet.
The worst thing they did is they didn’t include them in the process. In spite of his illiteracy/learning disability he should have been present during the talks about his diagnosis and treatment. As it was everything he heard was from his mother and the only experience with chemotherapy was his aunt. With a little preparation they might have been able to better to deal with the horrible side affects of his treatment.



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted May 16, 2009 at 7:24 pm


Chemo has side effects, some cause nausea, weakness, hair loss, all serious, but not horrible. What is horrible is what disease can do to your body if it isn’t treated. One of our neighbors had Hodgekins for twenty-two years, had treatment here and there, but was always able to work and care for his family. Another friend had a child who had Hodgekins, diagnosed at thirteen, had a remmission that lasted until she graduated from College, she lived to her middle twenties. Another friend has had it for 10 yrs. and is doing fine, and living a normal life. Fear is the conqueror, not the disease.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted May 16, 2009 at 8:49 pm


In a somewhat similar story, a couple in Wisconsin let their daughter die of diabetes because they believe “healing comes from God” so instead of getting medical help, they prayed.
And of course she died.



report abuse
 

rmcq

posted May 17, 2009 at 2:03 am


The parents in this case didn’t refuse because of their faith. They used faith to justify their refusal.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted May 18, 2009 at 10:06 pm


Another situation where “faith” gets in the way of caring for a child. Perhaps it’s not possible for them to realize that healing can come from more than one source…the praying and natural stuff AND modern medicine.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted May 19, 2009 at 5:45 pm


Parents are not doctors and they should seek to use all of the resources available concerning the health and welfare of their children.



report abuse
 

Patrick

posted May 26, 2009 at 7:12 pm


A bunch of liberal socialist hooey. If I had a kid in this situation, and I didn’t want his body to be destroyed by chemo to TRY and destroy the cancer… and the evil government MADE me do as they are here… I’d punch somebody in the mouth, and the judge would be first, the greedy doctor second. What happened to America? My country is dying, and Obama is the catalyst. Liberalism is a disease. I think we should go to court with the concept that liberalism is a disease inside people and they need chemo or they’ll die. I HATE what this country is becoming.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.